- This topic has 65 replies, 8 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 5 months ago by
meadandale.
-
AuthorPosts
-
April 23, 2010 at 12:37 PM #17375April 23, 2010 at 1:15 PM #543010
sdsubie
ParticipantHowdy FLU,
I read this blog every day, but don’t post very often. I’ve had quite a bit of experience with SSD’s in Apple’s newer laptops, both in the ones that you can configure it to ship with, and in upgrading conventional hard drives to SSD’s. There is a pretty good performance gain going to an SSD drive, even over a 7200RPM drive. OS boot times are roughly cut in half, operation inside the OS is also snappier.
Reliability has been absolutely great so far (knock on wood). Though my hands on experience is limited to the rebranded Samsung’s that ship with CTO Apple laptops, Intel, and Kingston SSD’s.
I think a SSD might be a good answer for what you are looking to do, build times that are being limited by disk.
Hope that helps.
April 23, 2010 at 1:15 PM #543123sdsubie
ParticipantHowdy FLU,
I read this blog every day, but don’t post very often. I’ve had quite a bit of experience with SSD’s in Apple’s newer laptops, both in the ones that you can configure it to ship with, and in upgrading conventional hard drives to SSD’s. There is a pretty good performance gain going to an SSD drive, even over a 7200RPM drive. OS boot times are roughly cut in half, operation inside the OS is also snappier.
Reliability has been absolutely great so far (knock on wood). Though my hands on experience is limited to the rebranded Samsung’s that ship with CTO Apple laptops, Intel, and Kingston SSD’s.
I think a SSD might be a good answer for what you are looking to do, build times that are being limited by disk.
Hope that helps.
April 23, 2010 at 1:15 PM #543599sdsubie
ParticipantHowdy FLU,
I read this blog every day, but don’t post very often. I’ve had quite a bit of experience with SSD’s in Apple’s newer laptops, both in the ones that you can configure it to ship with, and in upgrading conventional hard drives to SSD’s. There is a pretty good performance gain going to an SSD drive, even over a 7200RPM drive. OS boot times are roughly cut in half, operation inside the OS is also snappier.
Reliability has been absolutely great so far (knock on wood). Though my hands on experience is limited to the rebranded Samsung’s that ship with CTO Apple laptops, Intel, and Kingston SSD’s.
I think a SSD might be a good answer for what you are looking to do, build times that are being limited by disk.
Hope that helps.
April 23, 2010 at 1:15 PM #543691sdsubie
ParticipantHowdy FLU,
I read this blog every day, but don’t post very often. I’ve had quite a bit of experience with SSD’s in Apple’s newer laptops, both in the ones that you can configure it to ship with, and in upgrading conventional hard drives to SSD’s. There is a pretty good performance gain going to an SSD drive, even over a 7200RPM drive. OS boot times are roughly cut in half, operation inside the OS is also snappier.
Reliability has been absolutely great so far (knock on wood). Though my hands on experience is limited to the rebranded Samsung’s that ship with CTO Apple laptops, Intel, and Kingston SSD’s.
I think a SSD might be a good answer for what you are looking to do, build times that are being limited by disk.
Hope that helps.
April 23, 2010 at 1:15 PM #543965sdsubie
ParticipantHowdy FLU,
I read this blog every day, but don’t post very often. I’ve had quite a bit of experience with SSD’s in Apple’s newer laptops, both in the ones that you can configure it to ship with, and in upgrading conventional hard drives to SSD’s. There is a pretty good performance gain going to an SSD drive, even over a 7200RPM drive. OS boot times are roughly cut in half, operation inside the OS is also snappier.
Reliability has been absolutely great so far (knock on wood). Though my hands on experience is limited to the rebranded Samsung’s that ship with CTO Apple laptops, Intel, and Kingston SSD’s.
I think a SSD might be a good answer for what you are looking to do, build times that are being limited by disk.
Hope that helps.
April 23, 2010 at 2:11 PM #543025an
ParticipantI’m sure you did your research flu. I don’t have first hand experience with it yet, but I’ve seen enough benchmark to see that it easily beat the Raptor drive, and that’s a 10k RPM drive.
I’m seriously considering getting one as my boot drive for my PC. There seem to be a huge performance difference between the different brand too, so watch out for the cheap ones.
April 23, 2010 at 2:11 PM #543138an
ParticipantI’m sure you did your research flu. I don’t have first hand experience with it yet, but I’ve seen enough benchmark to see that it easily beat the Raptor drive, and that’s a 10k RPM drive.
I’m seriously considering getting one as my boot drive for my PC. There seem to be a huge performance difference between the different brand too, so watch out for the cheap ones.
April 23, 2010 at 2:11 PM #543614an
ParticipantI’m sure you did your research flu. I don’t have first hand experience with it yet, but I’ve seen enough benchmark to see that it easily beat the Raptor drive, and that’s a 10k RPM drive.
I’m seriously considering getting one as my boot drive for my PC. There seem to be a huge performance difference between the different brand too, so watch out for the cheap ones.
April 23, 2010 at 2:11 PM #543706an
ParticipantI’m sure you did your research flu. I don’t have first hand experience with it yet, but I’ve seen enough benchmark to see that it easily beat the Raptor drive, and that’s a 10k RPM drive.
I’m seriously considering getting one as my boot drive for my PC. There seem to be a huge performance difference between the different brand too, so watch out for the cheap ones.
April 23, 2010 at 2:11 PM #543980an
ParticipantI’m sure you did your research flu. I don’t have first hand experience with it yet, but I’ve seen enough benchmark to see that it easily beat the Raptor drive, and that’s a 10k RPM drive.
I’m seriously considering getting one as my boot drive for my PC. There seem to be a huge performance difference between the different brand too, so watch out for the cheap ones.
April 23, 2010 at 2:33 PM #543028Coronita
ParticipantThanks guys. Well, I’m debating if this is going to help me. Because my understanding is read is very fast, but the write isn’t as such. And doing builds mean doing a lot of writes…So I was curious if anyone does things like that routinely rip movie/audio files to these SSD, and see how that stacks up versus traditional drives.
April 23, 2010 at 2:33 PM #543143Coronita
ParticipantThanks guys. Well, I’m debating if this is going to help me. Because my understanding is read is very fast, but the write isn’t as such. And doing builds mean doing a lot of writes…So I was curious if anyone does things like that routinely rip movie/audio files to these SSD, and see how that stacks up versus traditional drives.
April 23, 2010 at 2:33 PM #543619Coronita
ParticipantThanks guys. Well, I’m debating if this is going to help me. Because my understanding is read is very fast, but the write isn’t as such. And doing builds mean doing a lot of writes…So I was curious if anyone does things like that routinely rip movie/audio files to these SSD, and see how that stacks up versus traditional drives.
April 23, 2010 at 2:33 PM #543711Coronita
ParticipantThanks guys. Well, I’m debating if this is going to help me. Because my understanding is read is very fast, but the write isn’t as such. And doing builds mean doing a lot of writes…So I was curious if anyone does things like that routinely rip movie/audio files to these SSD, and see how that stacks up versus traditional drives.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.