- This topic has 65 replies, 11 voices, and was last updated 13 years ago by
Eugene.
-
AuthorPosts
-
November 9, 2010 at 3:18 PM #629551November 9, 2010 at 3:49 PM #628481
bearishgurl
Participant[quote=enron_by_the_sea] . . . The mystery has deepened as sources at the Pentagon claim to know nothing of the missile. Stated Pentagon spokesman Col. Dave Lapan, “Nobody within the Department of Defense that we’ve reached out to has been able to explain what this contrail is, where it came from… It does seem implausible, and that’s why at this point the operative term is ‘unexplained’. . .[/quote]
I watched CONCHO’s SD-8 News video.
The Pentagon is “playing dumb” here and has not authorized any dissemination of the incident yet, IMHO.
November 9, 2010 at 3:49 PM #628559bearishgurl
Participant[quote=enron_by_the_sea] . . . The mystery has deepened as sources at the Pentagon claim to know nothing of the missile. Stated Pentagon spokesman Col. Dave Lapan, “Nobody within the Department of Defense that we’ve reached out to has been able to explain what this contrail is, where it came from… It does seem implausible, and that’s why at this point the operative term is ‘unexplained’. . .[/quote]
I watched CONCHO’s SD-8 News video.
The Pentagon is “playing dumb” here and has not authorized any dissemination of the incident yet, IMHO.
November 9, 2010 at 3:49 PM #629132bearishgurl
Participant[quote=enron_by_the_sea] . . . The mystery has deepened as sources at the Pentagon claim to know nothing of the missile. Stated Pentagon spokesman Col. Dave Lapan, “Nobody within the Department of Defense that we’ve reached out to has been able to explain what this contrail is, where it came from… It does seem implausible, and that’s why at this point the operative term is ‘unexplained’. . .[/quote]
I watched CONCHO’s SD-8 News video.
The Pentagon is “playing dumb” here and has not authorized any dissemination of the incident yet, IMHO.
November 9, 2010 at 3:49 PM #629258bearishgurl
Participant[quote=enron_by_the_sea] . . . The mystery has deepened as sources at the Pentagon claim to know nothing of the missile. Stated Pentagon spokesman Col. Dave Lapan, “Nobody within the Department of Defense that we’ve reached out to has been able to explain what this contrail is, where it came from… It does seem implausible, and that’s why at this point the operative term is ‘unexplained’. . .[/quote]
I watched CONCHO’s SD-8 News video.
The Pentagon is “playing dumb” here and has not authorized any dissemination of the incident yet, IMHO.
November 9, 2010 at 3:49 PM #629576bearishgurl
Participant[quote=enron_by_the_sea] . . . The mystery has deepened as sources at the Pentagon claim to know nothing of the missile. Stated Pentagon spokesman Col. Dave Lapan, “Nobody within the Department of Defense that we’ve reached out to has been able to explain what this contrail is, where it came from… It does seem implausible, and that’s why at this point the operative term is ‘unexplained’. . .[/quote]
I watched CONCHO’s SD-8 News video.
The Pentagon is “playing dumb” here and has not authorized any dissemination of the incident yet, IMHO.
November 9, 2010 at 8:38 PM #628595Effective Demand
ParticipantIts just an airplane coming from the horizon towards shore which causes an optical illusion of it climbing. The winds aloft are catching the contrails making it look like a parabolic arc. It is much ado about nothing.
November 9, 2010 at 8:38 PM #628675Effective Demand
ParticipantIts just an airplane coming from the horizon towards shore which causes an optical illusion of it climbing. The winds aloft are catching the contrails making it look like a parabolic arc. It is much ado about nothing.
November 9, 2010 at 8:38 PM #629247Effective Demand
ParticipantIts just an airplane coming from the horizon towards shore which causes an optical illusion of it climbing. The winds aloft are catching the contrails making it look like a parabolic arc. It is much ado about nothing.
November 9, 2010 at 8:38 PM #629373Effective Demand
ParticipantIts just an airplane coming from the horizon towards shore which causes an optical illusion of it climbing. The winds aloft are catching the contrails making it look like a parabolic arc. It is much ado about nothing.
November 9, 2010 at 8:38 PM #629692Effective Demand
ParticipantIts just an airplane coming from the horizon towards shore which causes an optical illusion of it climbing. The winds aloft are catching the contrails making it look like a parabolic arc. It is much ado about nothing.
November 10, 2010 at 8:34 AM #628649blahblahblah
Participant[quote=Effective Demand]Its just an airplane coming from the horizon towards shore which causes an optical illusion of it climbing. The winds aloft are catching the contrails making it look like a parabolic arc. It is much ado about nothing.[/quote]
Former deputy secretary of defense Robert Ellsworth doesn’t think so.
Clearly, nothing to see here. Everyone move along!
November 10, 2010 at 8:34 AM #628727blahblahblah
Participant[quote=Effective Demand]Its just an airplane coming from the horizon towards shore which causes an optical illusion of it climbing. The winds aloft are catching the contrails making it look like a parabolic arc. It is much ado about nothing.[/quote]
Former deputy secretary of defense Robert Ellsworth doesn’t think so.
Clearly, nothing to see here. Everyone move along!
November 10, 2010 at 8:34 AM #629300blahblahblah
Participant[quote=Effective Demand]Its just an airplane coming from the horizon towards shore which causes an optical illusion of it climbing. The winds aloft are catching the contrails making it look like a parabolic arc. It is much ado about nothing.[/quote]
Former deputy secretary of defense Robert Ellsworth doesn’t think so.
Clearly, nothing to see here. Everyone move along!
November 10, 2010 at 8:34 AM #629428blahblahblah
Participant[quote=Effective Demand]Its just an airplane coming from the horizon towards shore which causes an optical illusion of it climbing. The winds aloft are catching the contrails making it look like a parabolic arc. It is much ado about nothing.[/quote]
Former deputy secretary of defense Robert Ellsworth doesn’t think so.
Clearly, nothing to see here. Everyone move along!
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.