- This topic has 185 replies, 13 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 10 months ago by Anonymous.
-
AuthorPosts
-
July 15, 2009 at 1:34 PM #431491July 15, 2009 at 2:54 PM #430842dbapigParticipant
I just find it fascinating how successful the really rich are in persuading (tricking) the semi rich or wanna be riches into thinking they (wanna be riches) can somehow benefit from policy that benefits the rich.
July 15, 2009 at 2:54 PM #431056dbapigParticipantI just find it fascinating how successful the really rich are in persuading (tricking) the semi rich or wanna be riches into thinking they (wanna be riches) can somehow benefit from policy that benefits the rich.
July 15, 2009 at 2:54 PM #431351dbapigParticipantI just find it fascinating how successful the really rich are in persuading (tricking) the semi rich or wanna be riches into thinking they (wanna be riches) can somehow benefit from policy that benefits the rich.
July 15, 2009 at 2:54 PM #431421dbapigParticipantI just find it fascinating how successful the really rich are in persuading (tricking) the semi rich or wanna be riches into thinking they (wanna be riches) can somehow benefit from policy that benefits the rich.
July 15, 2009 at 2:54 PM #431578dbapigParticipantI just find it fascinating how successful the really rich are in persuading (tricking) the semi rich or wanna be riches into thinking they (wanna be riches) can somehow benefit from policy that benefits the rich.
July 15, 2009 at 3:00 PM #430847EugeneParticipantShould we provide health care to 50 million unfortunate hard-working Americans … or should we allow the fortunate to buy one more Louis Vuitton bag a year … hmm, tough call.
July 15, 2009 at 3:00 PM #431060EugeneParticipantShould we provide health care to 50 million unfortunate hard-working Americans … or should we allow the fortunate to buy one more Louis Vuitton bag a year … hmm, tough call.
July 15, 2009 at 3:00 PM #431356EugeneParticipantShould we provide health care to 50 million unfortunate hard-working Americans … or should we allow the fortunate to buy one more Louis Vuitton bag a year … hmm, tough call.
July 15, 2009 at 3:00 PM #431425EugeneParticipantShould we provide health care to 50 million unfortunate hard-working Americans … or should we allow the fortunate to buy one more Louis Vuitton bag a year … hmm, tough call.
July 15, 2009 at 3:00 PM #431583EugeneParticipantShould we provide health care to 50 million unfortunate hard-working Americans … or should we allow the fortunate to buy one more Louis Vuitton bag a year … hmm, tough call.
July 15, 2009 at 7:21 PM #431133VeritasParticipantFinancial crisis
“Louis XVI ascended to the throne amidst a financial crisis; the nation was nearing bankruptcy and outlays outpaced income.[5] This was because of France’s involvement in the Seven Years War and its participation in the American Revolution.[6] In May 1776, finance minister Turgot was dismissed, after he lost favour. The next year, Jacques Necker, a foreigner, was appointed Director-General of Finance. He was not made a minister because he was a Protestant, and could not become a naturalized French citizen.[7] Necker realized that the country’s tax system subjected some to an unfair burden;[7] numerous exemptions existed for the nobility and clergy.[8] He argued that the country could not be taxed higher, that the nobles and clergy should not be exempt from taxes, and proposed that borrowing would solve the country’s fiscal problems. Necker published a report to support this claim that underestimated the deficit by roughly 36,000 livres; and proposed restricting the spending power of the parlements. This was not received well by King’s ministers and Necker, hoping to solidify his position, argued to be accepted as a minister. The King refused, Necker was fired, and Charles Alexandre de Calonne was appointed to the Directorship.[7]”
“Calonne initially spent liberally, but he quickly realized the critical financial situation and put forth a new tax code.[9] The proposal included a consistent land tax, which would include taxation of the nobility and clergy, and the meeting of the Estates was planned for May 1789; a signal that the Bourbon monarchy was no longer absolute.”
July 15, 2009 at 7:21 PM #431348VeritasParticipantFinancial crisis
“Louis XVI ascended to the throne amidst a financial crisis; the nation was nearing bankruptcy and outlays outpaced income.[5] This was because of France’s involvement in the Seven Years War and its participation in the American Revolution.[6] In May 1776, finance minister Turgot was dismissed, after he lost favour. The next year, Jacques Necker, a foreigner, was appointed Director-General of Finance. He was not made a minister because he was a Protestant, and could not become a naturalized French citizen.[7] Necker realized that the country’s tax system subjected some to an unfair burden;[7] numerous exemptions existed for the nobility and clergy.[8] He argued that the country could not be taxed higher, that the nobles and clergy should not be exempt from taxes, and proposed that borrowing would solve the country’s fiscal problems. Necker published a report to support this claim that underestimated the deficit by roughly 36,000 livres; and proposed restricting the spending power of the parlements. This was not received well by King’s ministers and Necker, hoping to solidify his position, argued to be accepted as a minister. The King refused, Necker was fired, and Charles Alexandre de Calonne was appointed to the Directorship.[7]”
“Calonne initially spent liberally, but he quickly realized the critical financial situation and put forth a new tax code.[9] The proposal included a consistent land tax, which would include taxation of the nobility and clergy, and the meeting of the Estates was planned for May 1789; a signal that the Bourbon monarchy was no longer absolute.”
July 15, 2009 at 7:21 PM #431637VeritasParticipantFinancial crisis
“Louis XVI ascended to the throne amidst a financial crisis; the nation was nearing bankruptcy and outlays outpaced income.[5] This was because of France’s involvement in the Seven Years War and its participation in the American Revolution.[6] In May 1776, finance minister Turgot was dismissed, after he lost favour. The next year, Jacques Necker, a foreigner, was appointed Director-General of Finance. He was not made a minister because he was a Protestant, and could not become a naturalized French citizen.[7] Necker realized that the country’s tax system subjected some to an unfair burden;[7] numerous exemptions existed for the nobility and clergy.[8] He argued that the country could not be taxed higher, that the nobles and clergy should not be exempt from taxes, and proposed that borrowing would solve the country’s fiscal problems. Necker published a report to support this claim that underestimated the deficit by roughly 36,000 livres; and proposed restricting the spending power of the parlements. This was not received well by King’s ministers and Necker, hoping to solidify his position, argued to be accepted as a minister. The King refused, Necker was fired, and Charles Alexandre de Calonne was appointed to the Directorship.[7]”
“Calonne initially spent liberally, but he quickly realized the critical financial situation and put forth a new tax code.[9] The proposal included a consistent land tax, which would include taxation of the nobility and clergy, and the meeting of the Estates was planned for May 1789; a signal that the Bourbon monarchy was no longer absolute.”
July 15, 2009 at 7:21 PM #431708VeritasParticipantFinancial crisis
“Louis XVI ascended to the throne amidst a financial crisis; the nation was nearing bankruptcy and outlays outpaced income.[5] This was because of France’s involvement in the Seven Years War and its participation in the American Revolution.[6] In May 1776, finance minister Turgot was dismissed, after he lost favour. The next year, Jacques Necker, a foreigner, was appointed Director-General of Finance. He was not made a minister because he was a Protestant, and could not become a naturalized French citizen.[7] Necker realized that the country’s tax system subjected some to an unfair burden;[7] numerous exemptions existed for the nobility and clergy.[8] He argued that the country could not be taxed higher, that the nobles and clergy should not be exempt from taxes, and proposed that borrowing would solve the country’s fiscal problems. Necker published a report to support this claim that underestimated the deficit by roughly 36,000 livres; and proposed restricting the spending power of the parlements. This was not received well by King’s ministers and Necker, hoping to solidify his position, argued to be accepted as a minister. The King refused, Necker was fired, and Charles Alexandre de Calonne was appointed to the Directorship.[7]”
“Calonne initially spent liberally, but he quickly realized the critical financial situation and put forth a new tax code.[9] The proposal included a consistent land tax, which would include taxation of the nobility and clergy, and the meeting of the Estates was planned for May 1789; a signal that the Bourbon monarchy was no longer absolute.”
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.