Off Topic- Sotomayor Hearings

[NotCranky]

Hey, we can start “Honkies against the Marginalization of Whitey”…and don’t think we won’t! Those who don’t like La Raza or the NAACP or the Anti-Defamation League, will probably be fighting over who gets to be “Head Poobah”, the irony.

No podemos todos llevarnos bien? Por Favor?

[GH]

SK,
Some of my best friends are Mexican. I marched in London against Apartheid in the late 70’s. So go ahead and call me a racist if I don’t support your view, but you would do better to engage in meaningful dialog. Sotomayor is an activist judge and is not a good choice for a position requiring absolute impartiality.

[GH]

SK,
Some of my best friends are Mexican. I marched in London against Apartheid in the late 70’s. So go ahead and call me a racist if I don’t support your view, but you would do better to engage in meaningful dialog. Sotomayor is an activist judge and is not a good choice for a position requiring absolute impartiality.

[GH]

SK,
Some of my best friends are Mexican. I marched in London against Apartheid in the late 70’s. So go ahead and call me a racist if I don’t support your view, but you would do better to engage in meaningful dialog. Sotomayor is an activist judge and is not a good choice for a position requiring absolute impartiality.

[GH]

SK,
Some of my best friends are Mexican. I marched in London against Apartheid in the late 70’s. So go ahead and call me a racist if I don’t support your view, but you would do better to engage in meaningful dialog. Sotomayor is an activist judge and is not a good choice for a position requiring absolute impartiality.

[GH]

SK,
Some of my best friends are Mexican. I marched in London against Apartheid in the late 70’s. So go ahead and call me a racist if I don’t support your view, but you would do better to engage in meaningful dialog. Sotomayor is an activist judge and is not a good choice for a position requiring absolute impartiality.

[SK in CV]

[quote=GH]SK,
Some of my best friends are Mexican. I marched in London against Apartheid in the late 70’s. So go ahead and call me a racist if I don’t support your view, but you would do better to engage in meaningful dialog. Sotomayor is an activist judge and is not a good choice for a position requiring absolute impartiality.[/quote]

I suggest that you share with them your view that the NCLR is racist. And that congress and the supreme court, including the current nominee are conspiring to grant amnesty to 12 million illegal aliens. See how well they take that. It’s unlikely they will consider it “meaningful dialogue”.

Sotomayor has no record of activism from the bench. I would challenge you to cite any. (and PLEASE do not say Ricci. The Ricci decision wasn’t even close.) The current Roberts court majority is the most activist since the 60’s.

[SK in CV]

[quote=GH]SK,
Some of my best friends are Mexican. I marched in London against Apartheid in the late 70’s. So go ahead and call me a racist if I don’t support your view, but you would do better to engage in meaningful dialog. Sotomayor is an activist judge and is not a good choice for a position requiring absolute impartiality.[/quote]

I suggest that you share with them your view that the NCLR is racist. And that congress and the supreme court, including the current nominee are conspiring to grant amnesty to 12 million illegal aliens. See how well they take that. It’s unlikely they will consider it “meaningful dialogue”.

Sotomayor has no record of activism from the bench. I would challenge you to cite any. (and PLEASE do not say Ricci. The Ricci decision wasn’t even close.) The current Roberts court majority is the most activist since the 60’s.

[SK in CV]

[quote=GH]SK,
Some of my best friends are Mexican. I marched in London against Apartheid in the late 70’s. So go ahead and call me a racist if I don’t support your view, but you would do better to engage in meaningful dialog. Sotomayor is an activist judge and is not a good choice for a position requiring absolute impartiality.[/quote]

I suggest that you share with them your view that the NCLR is racist. And that congress and the supreme court, including the current nominee are conspiring to grant amnesty to 12 million illegal aliens. See how well they take that. It’s unlikely they will consider it “meaningful dialogue”.

Sotomayor has no record of activism from the bench. I would challenge you to cite any. (and PLEASE do not say Ricci. The Ricci decision wasn’t even close.) The current Roberts court majority is the most activist since the 60’s.

[SK in CV]

[quote=GH]SK,
Some of my best friends are Mexican. I marched in London against Apartheid in the late 70’s. So go ahead and call me a racist if I don’t support your view, but you would do better to engage in meaningful dialog. Sotomayor is an activist judge and is not a good choice for a position requiring absolute impartiality.[/quote]

I suggest that you share with them your view that the NCLR is racist. And that congress and the supreme court, including the current nominee are conspiring to grant amnesty to 12 million illegal aliens. See how well they take that. It’s unlikely they will consider it “meaningful dialogue”.

Sotomayor has no record of activism from the bench. I would challenge you to cite any. (and PLEASE do not say Ricci. The Ricci decision wasn’t even close.) The current Roberts court majority is the most activist since the 60’s.

[SK in CV]

[quote=GH]SK,
Some of my best friends are Mexican. I marched in London against Apartheid in the late 70’s. So go ahead and call me a racist if I don’t support your view, but you would do better to engage in meaningful dialog. Sotomayor is an activist judge and is not a good choice for a position requiring absolute impartiality.[/quote]

I suggest that you share with them your view that the NCLR is racist. And that congress and the supreme court, including the current nominee are conspiring to grant amnesty to 12 million illegal aliens. See how well they take that. It’s unlikely they will consider it “meaningful dialogue”.

Sotomayor has no record of activism from the bench. I would challenge you to cite any. (and PLEASE do not say Ricci. The Ricci decision wasn’t even close.) The current Roberts court majority is the most activist since the 60’s.

[NotCranky]

GH or anyone else, can you point out in no uncertain terms why she is an activist judge? It is somethng more than political bias? Why can it not be said that they are all activists? They are all appointed with political bias and bias on specific issues. If a republican appoints an pro-corporation, pro-gun, anti- abortion judge why is that not activism? Why is Sotamayor different or worse than any recent appointee? Because some disagree with her?

[NotCranky]

GH or anyone else, can you point out in no uncertain terms why she is an activist judge? It is somethng more than political bias? Why can it not be said that they are all activists? They are all appointed with political bias and bias on specific issues. If a republican appoints an pro-corporation, pro-gun, anti- abortion judge why is that not activism? Why is Sotamayor different or worse than any recent appointee? Because some disagree with her?

[NotCranky]

GH or anyone else, can you point out in no uncertain terms why she is an activist judge? It is somethng more than political bias? Why can it not be said that they are all activists? They are all appointed with political bias and bias on specific issues. If a republican appoints an pro-corporation, pro-gun, anti- abortion judge why is that not activism? Why is Sotamayor different or worse than any recent appointee? Because some disagree with her?

[NotCranky]

GH or anyone else, can you point out in no uncertain terms why she is an activist judge? It is somethng more than political bias? Why can it not be said that they are all activists? They are all appointed with political bias and bias on specific issues. If a republican appoints an pro-corporation, pro-gun, anti- abortion judge why is that not activism? Why is Sotamayor different or worse than any recent appointee? Because some disagree with her?

[Author]

Posts