Home › Forums › Other › Off Topic: Obama’s Aunt here illegally lol. Also latest on O’s fake Birth Cert
- This topic has 510 replies, 26 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 5 months ago by
nostradamus.
-
AuthorPosts
-
November 1, 2008 at 9:36 AM #296477November 1, 2008 at 9:45 AM #296068
Arraya
Participant[quote=jficquette][quote=arraya]John-What I find interesting is the prior judges ruling. “Lack of standing”:
Standing is founded “in concern about the proper–and properly limited–role of the courts in a democratic society.
It had nothing to do with the evidence. [/quote]
I think if you read it carefully it was dismissed because the Judge ruled Berg did not have a right to challenge.
Right now there is no evidence that Obama is an American citizen much less a natural born.
His international travels were on a diplomatic passport, not a US citizen passport.
But, you and I have gone round and round about it. I present the facts and you ignore them.
I am sort of over arguing about it with you. You refuse to see the light, just like every liberal I have ever known. In fact I think being to consider that being blind to reality is a prequiste for being a liberal.
John
[/quote]John, You are misunderstanding me. I am defending you on this, somewhat. I brought up the judges ruling because it gives credence to your argument because his ruling had NOTHING to do with the evidence. Sheesh!
What you need to do is take off the ideologic blinders and look at the systemic corruption. SYSTEMIC
Unfortunately, John, your consistent harping on this issue is not about truth, it’s about beating the other team and that is very apparent.
November 1, 2008 at 9:45 AM #296408Participant[quote=jficquette][quote=arraya]John-What I find interesting is the prior judges ruling. “Lack of standing”:
Standing is founded “in concern about the proper–and properly limited–role of the courts in a democratic society.
It had nothing to do with the evidence. [/quote]
I think if you read it carefully it was dismissed because the Judge ruled Berg did not have a right to challenge.
Right now there is no evidence that Obama is an American citizen much less a natural born.
His international travels were on a diplomatic passport, not a US citizen passport.
But, you and I have gone round and round about it. I present the facts and you ignore them.
I am sort of over arguing about it with you. You refuse to see the light, just like every liberal I have ever known. In fact I think being to consider that being blind to reality is a prequiste for being a liberal.
John
[/quote]John, You are misunderstanding me. I am defending you on this, somewhat. I brought up the judges ruling because it gives credence to your argument because his ruling had NOTHING to do with the evidence. Sheesh!
What you need to do is take off the ideologic blinders and look at the systemic corruption. SYSTEMIC
Unfortunately, John, your consistent harping on this issue is not about truth, it’s about beating the other team and that is very apparent.
November 1, 2008 at 9:45 AM #296429Participant[quote=jficquette][quote=arraya]John-What I find interesting is the prior judges ruling. “Lack of standing”:
Standing is founded “in concern about the proper–and properly limited–role of the courts in a democratic society.
It had nothing to do with the evidence. [/quote]
I think if you read it carefully it was dismissed because the Judge ruled Berg did not have a right to challenge.
Right now there is no evidence that Obama is an American citizen much less a natural born.
His international travels were on a diplomatic passport, not a US citizen passport.
But, you and I have gone round and round about it. I present the facts and you ignore them.
I am sort of over arguing about it with you. You refuse to see the light, just like every liberal I have ever known. In fact I think being to consider that being blind to reality is a prequiste for being a liberal.
John
[/quote]John, You are misunderstanding me. I am defending you on this, somewhat. I brought up the judges ruling because it gives credence to your argument because his ruling had NOTHING to do with the evidence. Sheesh!
What you need to do is take off the ideologic blinders and look at the systemic corruption. SYSTEMIC
Unfortunately, John, your consistent harping on this issue is not about truth, it’s about beating the other team and that is very apparent.
November 1, 2008 at 9:45 AM #296440Participant[quote=jficquette][quote=arraya]John-What I find interesting is the prior judges ruling. “Lack of standing”:
Standing is founded “in concern about the proper–and properly limited–role of the courts in a democratic society.
It had nothing to do with the evidence. [/quote]
I think if you read it carefully it was dismissed because the Judge ruled Berg did not have a right to challenge.
Right now there is no evidence that Obama is an American citizen much less a natural born.
His international travels were on a diplomatic passport, not a US citizen passport.
But, you and I have gone round and round about it. I present the facts and you ignore them.
I am sort of over arguing about it with you. You refuse to see the light, just like every liberal I have ever known. In fact I think being to consider that being blind to reality is a prequiste for being a liberal.
John
[/quote]John, You are misunderstanding me. I am defending you on this, somewhat. I brought up the judges ruling because it gives credence to your argument because his ruling had NOTHING to do with the evidence. Sheesh!
What you need to do is take off the ideologic blinders and look at the systemic corruption. SYSTEMIC
Unfortunately, John, your consistent harping on this issue is not about truth, it’s about beating the other team and that is very apparent.
November 1, 2008 at 9:45 AM #296481Participant[quote=jficquette][quote=arraya]John-What I find interesting is the prior judges ruling. “Lack of standing”:
Standing is founded “in concern about the proper–and properly limited–role of the courts in a democratic society.
It had nothing to do with the evidence. [/quote]
I think if you read it carefully it was dismissed because the Judge ruled Berg did not have a right to challenge.
Right now there is no evidence that Obama is an American citizen much less a natural born.
His international travels were on a diplomatic passport, not a US citizen passport.
But, you and I have gone round and round about it. I present the facts and you ignore them.
I am sort of over arguing about it with you. You refuse to see the light, just like every liberal I have ever known. In fact I think being to consider that being blind to reality is a prequiste for being a liberal.
John
[/quote]John, You are misunderstanding me. I am defending you on this, somewhat. I brought up the judges ruling because it gives credence to your argument because his ruling had NOTHING to do with the evidence. Sheesh!
What you need to do is take off the ideologic blinders and look at the systemic corruption. SYSTEMIC
Unfortunately, John, your consistent harping on this issue is not about truth, it’s about beating the other team and that is very apparent.
November 1, 2008 at 9:52 AM #296073jficquette
ParticipantArraya,
Sorry, I did misunderstand you and realized it after I wrote by diatribe. I apoligize. If I could have deleted my post I would have.
John
November 1, 2008 at 9:52 AM #296413ParticipantArraya,
Sorry, I did misunderstand you and realized it after I wrote by diatribe. I apoligize. If I could have deleted my post I would have.
John
November 1, 2008 at 9:52 AM #296433ParticipantArraya,
Sorry, I did misunderstand you and realized it after I wrote by diatribe. I apoligize. If I could have deleted my post I would have.
John
November 1, 2008 at 9:52 AM #296445ParticipantArraya,
Sorry, I did misunderstand you and realized it after I wrote by diatribe. I apoligize. If I could have deleted my post I would have.
John
November 1, 2008 at 9:52 AM #296486ParticipantArraya,
Sorry, I did misunderstand you and realized it after I wrote by diatribe. I apoligize. If I could have deleted my post I would have.
John
November 1, 2008 at 11:06 AM #296099cr
ParticipantIf it is true, he can’t be President, and it won’t matter what the voters think, and it won’t matter if he wins.
November 1, 2008 at 11:06 AM #296439ParticipantIf it is true, he can’t be President, and it won’t matter what the voters think, and it won’t matter if he wins.
November 1, 2008 at 11:06 AM #296458ParticipantIf it is true, he can’t be President, and it won’t matter what the voters think, and it won’t matter if he wins.
November 1, 2008 at 11:06 AM #296470ParticipantIf it is true, he can’t be President, and it won’t matter what the voters think, and it won’t matter if he wins.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.