Obama is the great hype machine

[equalizer]

Allan,

Are you talking about this book?: Justice For None: A Novel (Hardcover)
by Gene Hackman (Author), Daniel Lenihan (Author)

thanks

[equalizer]

NSR

I over reacted on principle and should chill out.

Allan: I liked Spence’s book cause he is one of a kind liberal who really practices free speech and freedom in general. I guess you read his book, “How to argue and win everytime” and yes i completely forget about his justice for none book.

[equalizer]

NSR

I over reacted on principle and should chill out.

Allan: I liked Spence’s book cause he is one of a kind liberal who really practices free speech and freedom in general. I guess you read his book, “How to argue and win everytime” and yes i completely forget about his justice for none book.

[equalizer]

NSR

I over reacted on principle and should chill out.

Allan: I liked Spence’s book cause he is one of a kind liberal who really practices free speech and freedom in general. I guess you read his book, “How to argue and win everytime” and yes i completely forget about his justice for none book.

[equalizer]

NSR

I over reacted on principle and should chill out.

Allan: I liked Spence’s book cause he is one of a kind liberal who really practices free speech and freedom in general. I guess you read his book, “How to argue and win everytime” and yes i completely forget about his justice for none book.

[equalizer]

NSR

I over reacted on principle and should chill out.

Allan: I liked Spence’s book cause he is one of a kind liberal who really practices free speech and freedom in general. I guess you read his book, “How to argue and win everytime” and yes i completely forget about his justice for none book.

[Allan from Fallbrook]

equalizer: Yep, it was the other Spence book I was referring to.

I did not read “How to argue” by Spence; it is probably the three years I spent in speech and debate, combined with my naturally cantankerous personality.

I don’t disagree with Spence’s ideas regarding the overly corporatized modern American monoculture. I simply took issue with the book’s incoherence in making the point.

I’m with you on the over-reaction on principle and needing to chill out. I seem to have been doing that a lot lately myself.

Have you read any Christopher Hitchens? Just curious. If yes, what are your thoughts as to his writings?

[Allan from Fallbrook]

equalizer: Yep, it was the other Spence book I was referring to.

I did not read “How to argue” by Spence; it is probably the three years I spent in speech and debate, combined with my naturally cantankerous personality.

I don’t disagree with Spence’s ideas regarding the overly corporatized modern American monoculture. I simply took issue with the book’s incoherence in making the point.

I’m with you on the over-reaction on principle and needing to chill out. I seem to have been doing that a lot lately myself.

Have you read any Christopher Hitchens? Just curious. If yes, what are your thoughts as to his writings?

[Allan from Fallbrook]

equalizer: Yep, it was the other Spence book I was referring to.

I did not read “How to argue” by Spence; it is probably the three years I spent in speech and debate, combined with my naturally cantankerous personality.

I don’t disagree with Spence’s ideas regarding the overly corporatized modern American monoculture. I simply took issue with the book’s incoherence in making the point.

I’m with you on the over-reaction on principle and needing to chill out. I seem to have been doing that a lot lately myself.

Have you read any Christopher Hitchens? Just curious. If yes, what are your thoughts as to his writings?

[Allan from Fallbrook]

equalizer: Yep, it was the other Spence book I was referring to.

I did not read “How to argue” by Spence; it is probably the three years I spent in speech and debate, combined with my naturally cantankerous personality.

I don’t disagree with Spence’s ideas regarding the overly corporatized modern American monoculture. I simply took issue with the book’s incoherence in making the point.

I’m with you on the over-reaction on principle and needing to chill out. I seem to have been doing that a lot lately myself.

Have you read any Christopher Hitchens? Just curious. If yes, what are your thoughts as to his writings?

[Allan from Fallbrook]

equalizer: Yep, it was the other Spence book I was referring to.

I did not read “How to argue” by Spence; it is probably the three years I spent in speech and debate, combined with my naturally cantankerous personality.

I don’t disagree with Spence’s ideas regarding the overly corporatized modern American monoculture. I simply took issue with the book’s incoherence in making the point.

I’m with you on the over-reaction on principle and needing to chill out. I seem to have been doing that a lot lately myself.

Have you read any Christopher Hitchens? Just curious. If yes, what are your thoughts as to his writings?

[nostradamus]

Equalizer et. al. you people should get a kick out of this. Kelly Tilghman was suspended today for her “lynch” comments. Al Sharpton actually stepped into the picture.

linky

Clearly her comments were taken out of context but here we are in Idiocracy again.

[nostradamus]

Equalizer et. al. you people should get a kick out of this. Kelly Tilghman was suspended today for her “lynch” comments. Al Sharpton actually stepped into the picture.

linky

Clearly her comments were taken out of context but here we are in Idiocracy again.

[nostradamus]

Equalizer et. al. you people should get a kick out of this. Kelly Tilghman was suspended today for her “lynch” comments. Al Sharpton actually stepped into the picture.

linky

Clearly her comments were taken out of context but here we are in Idiocracy again.

[nostradamus]

Equalizer et. al. you people should get a kick out of this. Kelly Tilghman was suspended today for her “lynch” comments. Al Sharpton actually stepped into the picture.

linky

Clearly her comments were taken out of context but here we are in Idiocracy again.

[Author]

Posts