New Hampshire District Admits Ron Paul Votes Not Counted

[donaldduckmoore]

Why in this forum?

[cr]

I hope Feb 5th Ron Paul wins California and the media has a heart attack having to face the fact that their political pundit is nothing more than hot air that people don’t want.

[cr]

I hope Feb 5th Ron Paul wins California and the media has a heart attack having to face the fact that their political pundit is nothing more than hot air that people don’t want.

[cr]

I hope Feb 5th Ron Paul wins California and the media has a heart attack having to face the fact that their political pundit is nothing more than hot air that people don’t want.

[cr]

I hope Feb 5th Ron Paul wins California and the media has a heart attack having to face the fact that their political pundit is nothing more than hot air that people don’t want.

[cr]

I hope Feb 5th Ron Paul wins California and the media has a heart attack having to face the fact that their political pundit is nothing more than hot air that people don’t want.

[robson]

While this looks really bad (and I personally wouldn’t doubt there was fraud on a larger scale) this data is statistically irrelevant and doesn’t prove anything in its current form. If voters in each district had a random chance of voting either electronically or by hand, these results would be impossible without fraud. But each district either votes by hand or electronically as a whole. This simply shows that those districts that like romney and clinton are the same that have an electronic voter system rather than a paper method. ATure, it generally holds true across town size, which is further evidence that is MIGHT be fraud, but still unfortunately doesn’t prove anything.

[robson]

While this looks really bad (and I personally wouldn’t doubt there was fraud on a larger scale) this data is statistically irrelevant and doesn’t prove anything in its current form. If voters in each district had a random chance of voting either electronically or by hand, these results would be impossible without fraud. But each district either votes by hand or electronically as a whole. This simply shows that those districts that like romney and clinton are the same that have an electronic voter system rather than a paper method. ATure, it generally holds true across town size, which is further evidence that is MIGHT be fraud, but still unfortunately doesn’t prove anything.

[robson]

While this looks really bad (and I personally wouldn’t doubt there was fraud on a larger scale) this data is statistically irrelevant and doesn’t prove anything in its current form. If voters in each district had a random chance of voting either electronically or by hand, these results would be impossible without fraud. But each district either votes by hand or electronically as a whole. This simply shows that those districts that like romney and clinton are the same that have an electronic voter system rather than a paper method. ATure, it generally holds true across town size, which is further evidence that is MIGHT be fraud, but still unfortunately doesn’t prove anything.

[robson]

While this looks really bad (and I personally wouldn’t doubt there was fraud on a larger scale) this data is statistically irrelevant and doesn’t prove anything in its current form. If voters in each district had a random chance of voting either electronically or by hand, these results would be impossible without fraud. But each district either votes by hand or electronically as a whole. This simply shows that those districts that like romney and clinton are the same that have an electronic voter system rather than a paper method. ATure, it generally holds true across town size, which is further evidence that is MIGHT be fraud, but still unfortunately doesn’t prove anything.

[robson]

While this looks really bad (and I personally wouldn’t doubt there was fraud on a larger scale) this data is statistically irrelevant and doesn’t prove anything in its current form. If voters in each district had a random chance of voting either electronically or by hand, these results would be impossible without fraud. But each district either votes by hand or electronically as a whole. This simply shows that those districts that like romney and clinton are the same that have an electronic voter system rather than a paper method. ATure, it generally holds true across town size, which is further evidence that is MIGHT be fraud, but still unfortunately doesn’t prove anything.

[Eugene]

While we are on the subject

Just heard this on NPR:
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=17990685

Newsletters here
http://www.tnr.com/politics/story.html?id=74978161-f730-43a2-91c3-de262573a129

[Eugene]

While we are on the subject

Just heard this on NPR:
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=17990685

Newsletters here
http://www.tnr.com/politics/story.html?id=74978161-f730-43a2-91c3-de262573a129

[Eugene]

While we are on the subject

Just heard this on NPR:
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=17990685

Newsletters here
http://www.tnr.com/politics/story.html?id=74978161-f730-43a2-91c3-de262573a129

[Eugene]

While we are on the subject

Just heard this on NPR:
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=17990685

Newsletters here
http://www.tnr.com/politics/story.html?id=74978161-f730-43a2-91c3-de262573a129

[Author]

Posts