NEW FORUM FEATURE: Ignore User

[Rich Toscano]

[quote=urbanrealtor]
The one-sided political dude gets banned but nothing about the jews-control-the-media-and-banking-and-hate-Ron-Paul?
[/quote]

I came within a millimeter of banning him for exactly that whole obnoxious line of thought. Perhaps I was wrong not to. But in the end, I decided, it’s a guy expressing his opinion and trying to debate it (though I will grant that the opinion is nonsensical and he is terrible at debating it).

That is distinct from NewToSD, who is clearly posting garbage with the absolutely no purpose other than to try to incite political flamewars. So, it’s not about him being a “one-sided political dude,” as you characterize it — we have several of them, in fact, who are still with us. It’s about him being a flamewar-starting troll.

[Anonymous]

Rich, you can delete this account too, since my muse is now gone and my name lacks the context which once made it clever. Unless, of course, you can think of others on this board whose arguments can be sarcastically refuted with verbatim quotes from Newt Gingrich, in which case I’ll be happy to continue providing you with that service.

I’m too intellectual; I’m too abstract; I think too much.

[CA renter]

[quote=walterwhite]Which leads to my new theory of humanity; there are two kinds of users–those who want to ignore themselves, and those who want to ignore everyone else.

Some cannot look in the mirror; others only wish to live in a hall of mirrors.[/quote]

See, it’s nuggets like this one that we can’t get from anyone else but you, scaredy. 🙂

[sdduuuude]

[quote=bearishgurl]FWIW, I won’t be ignoring any Pigg at present, REGARDLESS of their “idiosyncrasies.” I enjoy reading EVERYONE’s posts …

If any Pigg wishes to “ignore” me, GO FOR IT!! And more power to ya …[/quote]

Wow. Your shortest post ever. Nice work 🙂

[bearishgurl]

[quote=sdduuuude]Wow. Your shortest post ever. Nice work :)[/quote]

I find it odd that you post this, sdduuuude. I could name off a couple dozen Piggs whose posts are habitually longer than mine.

Does this mean you are on board with or agree with the substance or content of my posts since all you appear to have to say here is (“they”) are “too long?”

Or do you just have issues with your reading comprehension and/or attention span …??

LOL . . . ;=D

[NotCranky]

[quote=bearishgurl][quote=sdduuuude]Wow. Your shortest post ever. Nice work :)[/quote]

I find it odd that you post this, sdduuuude. I could name off a couple dozen Piggs whose posts are habitually longer than mine.

Does this mean you are on board with or agree with the substance or content of my posts since all you appear to have to say here is (“they”) are “too long?”

Or do you just have issues with your reading comprehension and/or attention span …??

LOL . . . ;=D[/quote]

If I had to guess, BG….he was being a little friendly.

[jstoesz]

For the record, I just assumed newtosd was sarcastic too…sad really.

[Coronita]

[quote=jstoesz]For the record, I just assumed newtosd was sarcastic too…sad really.[/quote]

Not really.

[urbanrealtor]

Some men just want to watch the world burn.

[sdduuuude]

[quote=bearishgurl][quote=sdduuuude]Wow. Your shortest post ever. Nice work :)[/quote]

I find it odd that you post this, sdduuuude. I could name off a couple dozen Piggs whose posts are habitually longer than mine.

Does this mean you are on board with or agree with the substance or content of my posts since all you appear to have to say here is (“they”) are “too long?”

Or do you just have issues with your reading comprehension and/or attention span …??

LOL . . . ;=D[/quote]

To be honest, I neither agree or disagree with you because your posts are so numerous and long that I simply don’t have the patience to get through them.

I look for posts with a high insight-per-word ratio – possibly due to my attention span, yes, thank you.

At least I haven’t ignored you.

I was being a little friendly and hinting that shorter posts would serve you (and every one else) better, in my opinion.

[Author]

Posts