Neighbors hate my Dog?!

[natty]

gentlemen, think big picture. empathy for a canine bite victim is answer to nothing.

Generalized example, as you asked of me:
a 5 1/2′ tall man, 165lbs, trained in military tactical security, could be forced in to room with an armed military soldier, 6’5″, 220lbs. The 5 1/2′ tall man is clearly undersized and outmatched, yet, could kill with bare hands and proper training.

to insist a poodle is no more dangerous than the next dog, simply because of comparative jaw width, is absurd.

i generally shy away from these types of discussion because people in general are so impassioned by years of ingrained garbage. an infant mauled to death by an animal is no more desirable, than a baby born to a misfit, uneducated child.

appreciate the responses, but they both strike me as people who have little to no experience with dogs.

[nocommonsense]

[quote=natty]gentlemen, think big picture. empathy for a canine bite victim is answer to nothing.

Generalized example, as you asked of me:
a 5 1/2′ tall man, 165lbs, trained in military tactical security, could be forced in to room with an armed military soldier, 6’5″, 220lbs. The 5 1/2′ tall man is clearly undersized and outmatched, yet, could kill with bare hands and proper training.

to insist a poodle is no more dangerous than the next dog, simply because of comparative jaw width, is absurd.

i generally shy away from these types of discussion because people in general are so impassioned by years of ingrained garbage. an infant mauled to death by an animal is no more desirable, than a baby born to a misfit, uneducated child.

appreciate the responses, but they both strike me as people who have little to no experience with dogs.[/quote]

“i generally shy away from these types of discussion because people in general are so impassioned by years of ingrained garbage.”

I wonder who you were referring to other than yourself. Are you out of your mind?? Is a pitbull NOT more dangerous than a poodle?

[nocommonsense]

[quote=natty]gentlemen, think big picture. empathy for a canine bite victim is answer to nothing.

Generalized example, as you asked of me:
a 5 1/2′ tall man, 165lbs, trained in military tactical security, could be forced in to room with an armed military soldier, 6’5″, 220lbs. The 5 1/2′ tall man is clearly undersized and outmatched, yet, could kill with bare hands and proper training.

to insist a poodle is no more dangerous than the next dog, simply because of comparative jaw width, is absurd.

i generally shy away from these types of discussion because people in general are so impassioned by years of ingrained garbage. an infant mauled to death by an animal is no more desirable, than a baby born to a misfit, uneducated child.

appreciate the responses, but they both strike me as people who have little to no experience with dogs.[/quote]

“i generally shy away from these types of discussion because people in general are so impassioned by years of ingrained garbage.”

I wonder who you were referring to other than yourself. Are you out of your mind?? Is a pitbull NOT more dangerous than a poodle?

[nocommonsense]

[quote=natty]gentlemen, think big picture. empathy for a canine bite victim is answer to nothing.

Generalized example, as you asked of me:
a 5 1/2′ tall man, 165lbs, trained in military tactical security, could be forced in to room with an armed military soldier, 6’5″, 220lbs. The 5 1/2′ tall man is clearly undersized and outmatched, yet, could kill with bare hands and proper training.

to insist a poodle is no more dangerous than the next dog, simply because of comparative jaw width, is absurd.

i generally shy away from these types of discussion because people in general are so impassioned by years of ingrained garbage. an infant mauled to death by an animal is no more desirable, than a baby born to a misfit, uneducated child.

appreciate the responses, but they both strike me as people who have little to no experience with dogs.[/quote]

“i generally shy away from these types of discussion because people in general are so impassioned by years of ingrained garbage.”

I wonder who you were referring to other than yourself. Are you out of your mind?? Is a pitbull NOT more dangerous than a poodle?

[nocommonsense]

[quote=natty]gentlemen, think big picture. empathy for a canine bite victim is answer to nothing.

Generalized example, as you asked of me:
a 5 1/2′ tall man, 165lbs, trained in military tactical security, could be forced in to room with an armed military soldier, 6’5″, 220lbs. The 5 1/2′ tall man is clearly undersized and outmatched, yet, could kill with bare hands and proper training.

to insist a poodle is no more dangerous than the next dog, simply because of comparative jaw width, is absurd.

i generally shy away from these types of discussion because people in general are so impassioned by years of ingrained garbage. an infant mauled to death by an animal is no more desirable, than a baby born to a misfit, uneducated child.

appreciate the responses, but they both strike me as people who have little to no experience with dogs.[/quote]

“i generally shy away from these types of discussion because people in general are so impassioned by years of ingrained garbage.”

I wonder who you were referring to other than yourself. Are you out of your mind?? Is a pitbull NOT more dangerous than a poodle?

[nocommonsense]

[quote=natty]gentlemen, think big picture. empathy for a canine bite victim is answer to nothing.

Generalized example, as you asked of me:
a 5 1/2′ tall man, 165lbs, trained in military tactical security, could be forced in to room with an armed military soldier, 6’5″, 220lbs. The 5 1/2′ tall man is clearly undersized and outmatched, yet, could kill with bare hands and proper training.

to insist a poodle is no more dangerous than the next dog, simply because of comparative jaw width, is absurd.

i generally shy away from these types of discussion because people in general are so impassioned by years of ingrained garbage. an infant mauled to death by an animal is no more desirable, than a baby born to a misfit, uneducated child.

appreciate the responses, but they both strike me as people who have little to no experience with dogs.[/quote]

“i generally shy away from these types of discussion because people in general are so impassioned by years of ingrained garbage.”

I wonder who you were referring to other than yourself. Are you out of your mind?? Is a pitbull NOT more dangerous than a poodle?

[NotCranky]

[quote=natty]gentlemen, think big picture. empathy for a canine bite victim is answer to nothing.

Generalized example, as you asked of me:
a 5 1/2′ tall man, 165lbs, trained in military tactical security, could be forced in to room with an armed military soldier, 6’5″, 220lbs. The 5 1/2′ tall man is clearly undersized and outmatched, yet, could kill with bare hands and proper training.

to insist a poodle is no more dangerous than the next dog, simply because of comparative jaw width, is absurd.

i generally shy away from these types of discussion because people in general are so impassioned by years of ingrained garbage. an infant mauled to death by an animal is no more desirable, than a baby born to a misfit, uneducated child.

appreciate the responses, but they both strike me as people who have little to no experience with dogs.[/quote]

No ingrained garbage(on this topic) and lots of experience with dogs.
You strike me as a pitbull owner who may be too in love with their dogs? Something is twisted in the way you weigh these things, though. Your logic is terrible. Good luck.

[NotCranky]

[quote=natty]gentlemen, think big picture. empathy for a canine bite victim is answer to nothing.

Generalized example, as you asked of me:
a 5 1/2′ tall man, 165lbs, trained in military tactical security, could be forced in to room with an armed military soldier, 6’5″, 220lbs. The 5 1/2′ tall man is clearly undersized and outmatched, yet, could kill with bare hands and proper training.

to insist a poodle is no more dangerous than the next dog, simply because of comparative jaw width, is absurd.

i generally shy away from these types of discussion because people in general are so impassioned by years of ingrained garbage. an infant mauled to death by an animal is no more desirable, than a baby born to a misfit, uneducated child.

appreciate the responses, but they both strike me as people who have little to no experience with dogs.[/quote]

No ingrained garbage(on this topic) and lots of experience with dogs.
You strike me as a pitbull owner who may be too in love with their dogs? Something is twisted in the way you weigh these things, though. Your logic is terrible. Good luck.

[NotCranky]

[quote=natty]gentlemen, think big picture. empathy for a canine bite victim is answer to nothing.

Generalized example, as you asked of me:
a 5 1/2′ tall man, 165lbs, trained in military tactical security, could be forced in to room with an armed military soldier, 6’5″, 220lbs. The 5 1/2′ tall man is clearly undersized and outmatched, yet, could kill with bare hands and proper training.

to insist a poodle is no more dangerous than the next dog, simply because of comparative jaw width, is absurd.

i generally shy away from these types of discussion because people in general are so impassioned by years of ingrained garbage. an infant mauled to death by an animal is no more desirable, than a baby born to a misfit, uneducated child.

appreciate the responses, but they both strike me as people who have little to no experience with dogs.[/quote]

No ingrained garbage(on this topic) and lots of experience with dogs.
You strike me as a pitbull owner who may be too in love with their dogs? Something is twisted in the way you weigh these things, though. Your logic is terrible. Good luck.

[NotCranky]

[quote=natty]gentlemen, think big picture. empathy for a canine bite victim is answer to nothing.

Generalized example, as you asked of me:
a 5 1/2′ tall man, 165lbs, trained in military tactical security, could be forced in to room with an armed military soldier, 6’5″, 220lbs. The 5 1/2′ tall man is clearly undersized and outmatched, yet, could kill with bare hands and proper training.

to insist a poodle is no more dangerous than the next dog, simply because of comparative jaw width, is absurd.

i generally shy away from these types of discussion because people in general are so impassioned by years of ingrained garbage. an infant mauled to death by an animal is no more desirable, than a baby born to a misfit, uneducated child.

appreciate the responses, but they both strike me as people who have little to no experience with dogs.[/quote]

No ingrained garbage(on this topic) and lots of experience with dogs.
You strike me as a pitbull owner who may be too in love with their dogs? Something is twisted in the way you weigh these things, though. Your logic is terrible. Good luck.

[NotCranky]

[quote=natty]gentlemen, think big picture. empathy for a canine bite victim is answer to nothing.

Generalized example, as you asked of me:
a 5 1/2′ tall man, 165lbs, trained in military tactical security, could be forced in to room with an armed military soldier, 6’5″, 220lbs. The 5 1/2′ tall man is clearly undersized and outmatched, yet, could kill with bare hands and proper training.

to insist a poodle is no more dangerous than the next dog, simply because of comparative jaw width, is absurd.

i generally shy away from these types of discussion because people in general are so impassioned by years of ingrained garbage. an infant mauled to death by an animal is no more desirable, than a baby born to a misfit, uneducated child.

appreciate the responses, but they both strike me as people who have little to no experience with dogs.[/quote]

No ingrained garbage(on this topic) and lots of experience with dogs.
You strike me as a pitbull owner who may be too in love with their dogs? Something is twisted in the way you weigh these things, though. Your logic is terrible. Good luck.

[outtamojo]

There are reasons they have weight divisions in boxing,MMA and such and none of ’em have to do with training.

[outtamojo]

There are reasons they have weight divisions in boxing,MMA and such and none of ’em have to do with training.

[outtamojo]

There are reasons they have weight divisions in boxing,MMA and such and none of ’em have to do with training.

[outtamojo]

There are reasons they have weight divisions in boxing,MMA and such and none of ’em have to do with training.

[Author]

Posts