- This topic has 175 replies, 15 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 6 months ago by DWCAP.
-
AuthorPosts
-
November 13, 2008 at 11:05 PM #304740November 13, 2008 at 11:11 PM #304290sdrealtorParticipant
Fearful
The market is not paralyzed. As soon as one buyer falls out another one steps up to take a swing. I am doing a ton of work in the sub 500K market and there seems to be an unending stream of buyers out there pursuing a limited number of quality/well priced (at least in the current market) properties. Disclaimer: this is what I am personally seeing and may not be representative of what others are seeing.One more point, I have listings in other SoCal counties. the markets there are much less active than San Diego County. MUCH….LESS…..ACTIVE. I guess you could even say that it is different here.
November 13, 2008 at 11:11 PM #304658sdrealtorParticipantFearful
The market is not paralyzed. As soon as one buyer falls out another one steps up to take a swing. I am doing a ton of work in the sub 500K market and there seems to be an unending stream of buyers out there pursuing a limited number of quality/well priced (at least in the current market) properties. Disclaimer: this is what I am personally seeing and may not be representative of what others are seeing.One more point, I have listings in other SoCal counties. the markets there are much less active than San Diego County. MUCH….LESS…..ACTIVE. I guess you could even say that it is different here.
November 13, 2008 at 11:11 PM #304669sdrealtorParticipantFearful
The market is not paralyzed. As soon as one buyer falls out another one steps up to take a swing. I am doing a ton of work in the sub 500K market and there seems to be an unending stream of buyers out there pursuing a limited number of quality/well priced (at least in the current market) properties. Disclaimer: this is what I am personally seeing and may not be representative of what others are seeing.One more point, I have listings in other SoCal counties. the markets there are much less active than San Diego County. MUCH….LESS…..ACTIVE. I guess you could even say that it is different here.
November 13, 2008 at 11:11 PM #304686sdrealtorParticipantFearful
The market is not paralyzed. As soon as one buyer falls out another one steps up to take a swing. I am doing a ton of work in the sub 500K market and there seems to be an unending stream of buyers out there pursuing a limited number of quality/well priced (at least in the current market) properties. Disclaimer: this is what I am personally seeing and may not be representative of what others are seeing.One more point, I have listings in other SoCal counties. the markets there are much less active than San Diego County. MUCH….LESS…..ACTIVE. I guess you could even say that it is different here.
November 13, 2008 at 11:11 PM #304745sdrealtorParticipantFearful
The market is not paralyzed. As soon as one buyer falls out another one steps up to take a swing. I am doing a ton of work in the sub 500K market and there seems to be an unending stream of buyers out there pursuing a limited number of quality/well priced (at least in the current market) properties. Disclaimer: this is what I am personally seeing and may not be representative of what others are seeing.One more point, I have listings in other SoCal counties. the markets there are much less active than San Diego County. MUCH….LESS…..ACTIVE. I guess you could even say that it is different here.
November 13, 2008 at 11:25 PM #304300DWCAPParticipantOne thing Id like to add; I think most of the people here underestimate peoples willingness to take risk. Look at the bubble, people were willing to take on huge amounts of risk, cause they thought it was a sure thing.
Now, they are willing to take on huge amounts of risk because prices are so “low”.
Soon they will be willing to take on lots of risk because they know someone who has made a killing.Piggs as a whole are a risk adverse group. The idea of buying outside of solid historical fundamentals is blasphmy to piggs. For most people it is a much more surreal experience to buy a house. They want it, they like it, they are gonna do it. All else be damned.
And if you want to know how it is possible for them to do this, here are two ideas.
1) you are most likley sitting on 4-8 months of living expenses. This liquidity could easly be used to buy things or be put to work ‘investing’ in houses. You dont use it, they do.2) You are most likley saving for retirment. I max out my roth, put 10% into my 401k (more than maxing out my employeer 401k matching contribution), and put more into private mutual fund accounts. I view this as necessary, long before buying a house is necessary. I suspect many of you feel the same way. But many people feel that owning a house is necessary long before any of those things are. So we get todays baby boomers who have inadaquate savings but huge networths. Who says todays homebuyers are any different?
November 13, 2008 at 11:25 PM #304668DWCAPParticipantOne thing Id like to add; I think most of the people here underestimate peoples willingness to take risk. Look at the bubble, people were willing to take on huge amounts of risk, cause they thought it was a sure thing.
Now, they are willing to take on huge amounts of risk because prices are so “low”.
Soon they will be willing to take on lots of risk because they know someone who has made a killing.Piggs as a whole are a risk adverse group. The idea of buying outside of solid historical fundamentals is blasphmy to piggs. For most people it is a much more surreal experience to buy a house. They want it, they like it, they are gonna do it. All else be damned.
And if you want to know how it is possible for them to do this, here are two ideas.
1) you are most likley sitting on 4-8 months of living expenses. This liquidity could easly be used to buy things or be put to work ‘investing’ in houses. You dont use it, they do.2) You are most likley saving for retirment. I max out my roth, put 10% into my 401k (more than maxing out my employeer 401k matching contribution), and put more into private mutual fund accounts. I view this as necessary, long before buying a house is necessary. I suspect many of you feel the same way. But many people feel that owning a house is necessary long before any of those things are. So we get todays baby boomers who have inadaquate savings but huge networths. Who says todays homebuyers are any different?
November 13, 2008 at 11:25 PM #304679DWCAPParticipantOne thing Id like to add; I think most of the people here underestimate peoples willingness to take risk. Look at the bubble, people were willing to take on huge amounts of risk, cause they thought it was a sure thing.
Now, they are willing to take on huge amounts of risk because prices are so “low”.
Soon they will be willing to take on lots of risk because they know someone who has made a killing.Piggs as a whole are a risk adverse group. The idea of buying outside of solid historical fundamentals is blasphmy to piggs. For most people it is a much more surreal experience to buy a house. They want it, they like it, they are gonna do it. All else be damned.
And if you want to know how it is possible for them to do this, here are two ideas.
1) you are most likley sitting on 4-8 months of living expenses. This liquidity could easly be used to buy things or be put to work ‘investing’ in houses. You dont use it, they do.2) You are most likley saving for retirment. I max out my roth, put 10% into my 401k (more than maxing out my employeer 401k matching contribution), and put more into private mutual fund accounts. I view this as necessary, long before buying a house is necessary. I suspect many of you feel the same way. But many people feel that owning a house is necessary long before any of those things are. So we get todays baby boomers who have inadaquate savings but huge networths. Who says todays homebuyers are any different?
November 13, 2008 at 11:25 PM #304696DWCAPParticipantOne thing Id like to add; I think most of the people here underestimate peoples willingness to take risk. Look at the bubble, people were willing to take on huge amounts of risk, cause they thought it was a sure thing.
Now, they are willing to take on huge amounts of risk because prices are so “low”.
Soon they will be willing to take on lots of risk because they know someone who has made a killing.Piggs as a whole are a risk adverse group. The idea of buying outside of solid historical fundamentals is blasphmy to piggs. For most people it is a much more surreal experience to buy a house. They want it, they like it, they are gonna do it. All else be damned.
And if you want to know how it is possible for them to do this, here are two ideas.
1) you are most likley sitting on 4-8 months of living expenses. This liquidity could easly be used to buy things or be put to work ‘investing’ in houses. You dont use it, they do.2) You are most likley saving for retirment. I max out my roth, put 10% into my 401k (more than maxing out my employeer 401k matching contribution), and put more into private mutual fund accounts. I view this as necessary, long before buying a house is necessary. I suspect many of you feel the same way. But many people feel that owning a house is necessary long before any of those things are. So we get todays baby boomers who have inadaquate savings but huge networths. Who says todays homebuyers are any different?
November 13, 2008 at 11:25 PM #304755DWCAPParticipantOne thing Id like to add; I think most of the people here underestimate peoples willingness to take risk. Look at the bubble, people were willing to take on huge amounts of risk, cause they thought it was a sure thing.
Now, they are willing to take on huge amounts of risk because prices are so “low”.
Soon they will be willing to take on lots of risk because they know someone who has made a killing.Piggs as a whole are a risk adverse group. The idea of buying outside of solid historical fundamentals is blasphmy to piggs. For most people it is a much more surreal experience to buy a house. They want it, they like it, they are gonna do it. All else be damned.
And if you want to know how it is possible for them to do this, here are two ideas.
1) you are most likley sitting on 4-8 months of living expenses. This liquidity could easly be used to buy things or be put to work ‘investing’ in houses. You dont use it, they do.2) You are most likley saving for retirment. I max out my roth, put 10% into my 401k (more than maxing out my employeer 401k matching contribution), and put more into private mutual fund accounts. I view this as necessary, long before buying a house is necessary. I suspect many of you feel the same way. But many people feel that owning a house is necessary long before any of those things are. So we get todays baby boomers who have inadaquate savings but huge networths. Who says todays homebuyers are any different?
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.