Most subprime lenders weren’t subject to federal lending law

[patientlywaiting]

I wonder what Republicans have to say about this?

———

Sunday, November 16, 2008
Most subprime lenders weren’t subject to federal lending law
By RONALD CAMPBELL
The Orange County Register
Comments 3| Recommend 1

Did a 31-year-old law giving poor people a break at the bank accidentally break the bank?

A lot of opinion leaders think so. From the editorial pages of The Wall Street Journal to talk shows to the op-ed page of The Register, people are charging that the Community Reinvestment Act of 1977 forced banks to make bad loans, leading to financial Armageddon.

There’s just one problem: It isn’t true.

A Register analysis of more than 12 million subprime mortgages worth nearly $2 trillion shows that most of the lenders who made risky subprime loans were exempt from the Community Reinvestment Act. And many of the lenders covered by the law that did make subprime loans came late to that market – after smaller, unregulated players showed there was money to be made.

http://www.ocregister.com/articles/loans-subprime-banks-2228728-law-lenders?ref=patrick.net#

[patientlywaiting]

On the role of Phil Gramm.

*

BTW, I agree with Phil Gramm. However, the only way for this market theories to work, is for the government to stay out. You can’t have bailouts without regulations — the two go hand in hand.

For the invisible hand to work, then we need to let the chips fall where they may.

[patientlywaiting]

On the role of Phil Gramm.

*

BTW, I agree with Phil Gramm. However, the only way for this market theories to work, is for the government to stay out. You can’t have bailouts without regulations — the two go hand in hand.

For the invisible hand to work, then we need to let the chips fall where they may.

[patientlywaiting]

On the role of Phil Gramm.

*

BTW, I agree with Phil Gramm. However, the only way for this market theories to work, is for the government to stay out. You can’t have bailouts without regulations — the two go hand in hand.

For the invisible hand to work, then we need to let the chips fall where they may.

[patientlywaiting]

On the role of Phil Gramm.

*

BTW, I agree with Phil Gramm. However, the only way for this market theories to work, is for the government to stay out. You can’t have bailouts without regulations — the two go hand in hand.

For the invisible hand to work, then we need to let the chips fall where they may.

[patientlywaiting]

On the role of Phil Gramm.

*

BTW, I agree with Phil Gramm. However, the only way for this market theories to work, is for the government to stay out. You can’t have bailouts without regulations — the two go hand in hand.

For the invisible hand to work, then we need to let the chips fall where they may.

[Author]

Posts