Most middle class still can’t buy a house

[alarmclock]

I am surprised none of the powers that be have suggested demolishing the excess inventory.

[HappyHouseHunting]

The unintended consequences of demolishing homes would be fun to watch though! (Of course, I mean in a purely ghoulish way!)

Can you imagine if rather than sell at a loss they tore them down and basically said up yours to everyone!? They would still owe money to someone for all the money they used to build them but now would only have land to sell for cash. But, of course, real estate only goes up, so no need to be so drastic. Ha.

[HappyHouseHunting]

The unintended consequences of demolishing homes would be fun to watch though! (Of course, I mean in a purely ghoulish way!)

Can you imagine if rather than sell at a loss they tore them down and basically said up yours to everyone!? They would still owe money to someone for all the money they used to build them but now would only have land to sell for cash. But, of course, real estate only goes up, so no need to be so drastic. Ha.

[HappyHouseHunting]

The unintended consequences of demolishing homes would be fun to watch though! (Of course, I mean in a purely ghoulish way!)

Can you imagine if rather than sell at a loss they tore them down and basically said up yours to everyone!? They would still owe money to someone for all the money they used to build them but now would only have land to sell for cash. But, of course, real estate only goes up, so no need to be so drastic. Ha.

[HappyHouseHunting]

The unintended consequences of demolishing homes would be fun to watch though! (Of course, I mean in a purely ghoulish way!)

Can you imagine if rather than sell at a loss they tore them down and basically said up yours to everyone!? They would still owe money to someone for all the money they used to build them but now would only have land to sell for cash. But, of course, real estate only goes up, so no need to be so drastic. Ha.

[HappyHouseHunting]

The unintended consequences of demolishing homes would be fun to watch though! (Of course, I mean in a purely ghoulish way!)

Can you imagine if rather than sell at a loss they tore them down and basically said up yours to everyone!? They would still owe money to someone for all the money they used to build them but now would only have land to sell for cash. But, of course, real estate only goes up, so no need to be so drastic. Ha.

[surveyor]

re-development

Instead of demolition (the reason why they don’t do the demolition is because it requires a lot of money) in the rustbelt, the local gov’t will condemn and take ownership of abandoned houses and re-develop it into affordable housing. I don’t see why they can’t do that here. It’s certainly a cheaper process than building brand new affordable housing.

[surveyor]

re-development

Instead of demolition (the reason why they don’t do the demolition is because it requires a lot of money) in the rustbelt, the local gov’t will condemn and take ownership of abandoned houses and re-develop it into affordable housing. I don’t see why they can’t do that here. It’s certainly a cheaper process than building brand new affordable housing.

[surveyor]

re-development

Instead of demolition (the reason why they don’t do the demolition is because it requires a lot of money) in the rustbelt, the local gov’t will condemn and take ownership of abandoned houses and re-develop it into affordable housing. I don’t see why they can’t do that here. It’s certainly a cheaper process than building brand new affordable housing.

[surveyor]

re-development

Instead of demolition (the reason why they don’t do the demolition is because it requires a lot of money) in the rustbelt, the local gov’t will condemn and take ownership of abandoned houses and re-develop it into affordable housing. I don’t see why they can’t do that here. It’s certainly a cheaper process than building brand new affordable housing.

[surveyor]

re-development

Instead of demolition (the reason why they don’t do the demolition is because it requires a lot of money) in the rustbelt, the local gov’t will condemn and take ownership of abandoned houses and re-develop it into affordable housing. I don’t see why they can’t do that here. It’s certainly a cheaper process than building brand new affordable housing.

[jpinpb]

Have any of you seen some of these homes in foreclosure? Some look as if they’ve been demolished. People have taken EVERYTHING out, trashed the place, broken windows, etc. etc.

That one I just don’t get. You take out a loan you have no business doing for buying a house you can’t afford, live there for free for months before they actually get your a$$ out and then you trash the place. Nice. LOSERS.

[jpinpb]

Have any of you seen some of these homes in foreclosure? Some look as if they’ve been demolished. People have taken EVERYTHING out, trashed the place, broken windows, etc. etc.

That one I just don’t get. You take out a loan you have no business doing for buying a house you can’t afford, live there for free for months before they actually get your a$$ out and then you trash the place. Nice. LOSERS.

[jpinpb]

Have any of you seen some of these homes in foreclosure? Some look as if they’ve been demolished. People have taken EVERYTHING out, trashed the place, broken windows, etc. etc.

That one I just don’t get. You take out a loan you have no business doing for buying a house you can’t afford, live there for free for months before they actually get your a$$ out and then you trash the place. Nice. LOSERS.

[jpinpb]

Have any of you seen some of these homes in foreclosure? Some look as if they’ve been demolished. People have taken EVERYTHING out, trashed the place, broken windows, etc. etc.

That one I just don’t get. You take out a loan you have no business doing for buying a house you can’t afford, live there for free for months before they actually get your a$$ out and then you trash the place. Nice. LOSERS.

[Author]

Posts