Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › Michael Moore’s ‘Capitalism: A Love Story’
- This topic has 55 replies, 11 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 5 months ago by
briansd1.
-
AuthorPosts
-
September 15, 2009 at 10:54 PM #16346September 15, 2009 at 11:56 PM #457164
urbanrealtor
ParticipantWhile I find his stuff entertaining (I am a liberal and he is funny) I think that the NY Times referred to him as a bumper sticker masquerading as political ideology (or something similar).
Thats about right.
He raises a few good points and questions and then keeps going on for like 2 hours.He is no John Stewart.
Stewart engages his opponents.
Moore just kind of screams in an echo chamber or chants against his opponents.
Not my favorite pundit or activist.September 15, 2009 at 11:56 PM #457360urbanrealtor
ParticipantWhile I find his stuff entertaining (I am a liberal and he is funny) I think that the NY Times referred to him as a bumper sticker masquerading as political ideology (or something similar).
Thats about right.
He raises a few good points and questions and then keeps going on for like 2 hours.He is no John Stewart.
Stewart engages his opponents.
Moore just kind of screams in an echo chamber or chants against his opponents.
Not my favorite pundit or activist.September 15, 2009 at 11:56 PM #457964urbanrealtor
ParticipantWhile I find his stuff entertaining (I am a liberal and he is funny) I think that the NY Times referred to him as a bumper sticker masquerading as political ideology (or something similar).
Thats about right.
He raises a few good points and questions and then keeps going on for like 2 hours.He is no John Stewart.
Stewart engages his opponents.
Moore just kind of screams in an echo chamber or chants against his opponents.
Not my favorite pundit or activist.September 15, 2009 at 11:56 PM #457773urbanrealtor
ParticipantWhile I find his stuff entertaining (I am a liberal and he is funny) I think that the NY Times referred to him as a bumper sticker masquerading as political ideology (or something similar).
Thats about right.
He raises a few good points and questions and then keeps going on for like 2 hours.He is no John Stewart.
Stewart engages his opponents.
Moore just kind of screams in an echo chamber or chants against his opponents.
Not my favorite pundit or activist.September 15, 2009 at 11:56 PM #457700urbanrealtor
ParticipantWhile I find his stuff entertaining (I am a liberal and he is funny) I think that the NY Times referred to him as a bumper sticker masquerading as political ideology (or something similar).
Thats about right.
He raises a few good points and questions and then keeps going on for like 2 hours.He is no John Stewart.
Stewart engages his opponents.
Moore just kind of screams in an echo chamber or chants against his opponents.
Not my favorite pundit or activist.September 16, 2009 at 7:33 AM #457214evolusd
ParticipantHaven’t seen it, but will probably rent it. Despite being a gun owner and proponent of the 2nd amendment, I really enjoyed his documentary Bowling for Columbine.
September 16, 2009 at 7:33 AM #457409evolusd
ParticipantHaven’t seen it, but will probably rent it. Despite being a gun owner and proponent of the 2nd amendment, I really enjoyed his documentary Bowling for Columbine.
September 16, 2009 at 7:33 AM #458014evolusd
ParticipantHaven’t seen it, but will probably rent it. Despite being a gun owner and proponent of the 2nd amendment, I really enjoyed his documentary Bowling for Columbine.
September 16, 2009 at 7:33 AM #457823evolusd
ParticipantHaven’t seen it, but will probably rent it. Despite being a gun owner and proponent of the 2nd amendment, I really enjoyed his documentary Bowling for Columbine.
September 16, 2009 at 7:33 AM #457750evolusd
ParticipantHaven’t seen it, but will probably rent it. Despite being a gun owner and proponent of the 2nd amendment, I really enjoyed his documentary Bowling for Columbine.
September 16, 2009 at 11:30 AM #457932yooklid
ParticipantI think what people ignored was that he said Gun ownership was NOT the problem. They just see it as an anti gun movie and don’t watch it.
September 16, 2009 at 11:30 AM #458119yooklid
ParticipantI think what people ignored was that he said Gun ownership was NOT the problem. They just see it as an anti gun movie and don’t watch it.
September 16, 2009 at 11:30 AM #457859yooklid
ParticipantI think what people ignored was that he said Gun ownership was NOT the problem. They just see it as an anti gun movie and don’t watch it.
September 16, 2009 at 11:30 AM #457324yooklid
ParticipantI think what people ignored was that he said Gun ownership was NOT the problem. They just see it as an anti gun movie and don’t watch it.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.