- This topic has 50 replies, 7 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 4 months ago by sdrealtor.
-
AuthorPosts
-
January 19, 2011 at 3:26 PM #657073January 19, 2011 at 3:50 PM #655981bearishgurlParticipant
FYI, the last time I was a seller of RE was just over two months ago, on a property I owned with a family member. All was in order and closed timely because all the conditions I listed above were met. I maintain that if the seller’s property is sound, seller’s disclosure is properly made, the above conditions are met (and the seller is not trying to “short” his/her lender(s), lol), then they don’t have to worry about their buyer being a “flake.”
Reread my previous post.
January 19, 2011 at 3:50 PM #656042bearishgurlParticipantFYI, the last time I was a seller of RE was just over two months ago, on a property I owned with a family member. All was in order and closed timely because all the conditions I listed above were met. I maintain that if the seller’s property is sound, seller’s disclosure is properly made, the above conditions are met (and the seller is not trying to “short” his/her lender(s), lol), then they don’t have to worry about their buyer being a “flake.”
Reread my previous post.
January 19, 2011 at 3:50 PM #656640bearishgurlParticipantFYI, the last time I was a seller of RE was just over two months ago, on a property I owned with a family member. All was in order and closed timely because all the conditions I listed above were met. I maintain that if the seller’s property is sound, seller’s disclosure is properly made, the above conditions are met (and the seller is not trying to “short” his/her lender(s), lol), then they don’t have to worry about their buyer being a “flake.”
Reread my previous post.
January 19, 2011 at 3:50 PM #656778bearishgurlParticipantFYI, the last time I was a seller of RE was just over two months ago, on a property I owned with a family member. All was in order and closed timely because all the conditions I listed above were met. I maintain that if the seller’s property is sound, seller’s disclosure is properly made, the above conditions are met (and the seller is not trying to “short” his/her lender(s), lol), then they don’t have to worry about their buyer being a “flake.”
Reread my previous post.
January 19, 2011 at 3:50 PM #657108bearishgurlParticipantFYI, the last time I was a seller of RE was just over two months ago, on a property I owned with a family member. All was in order and closed timely because all the conditions I listed above were met. I maintain that if the seller’s property is sound, seller’s disclosure is properly made, the above conditions are met (and the seller is not trying to “short” his/her lender(s), lol), then they don’t have to worry about their buyer being a “flake.”
Reread my previous post.
January 19, 2011 at 4:04 PM #655996sdrealtorParticipantCongratulations! However I have been involved in about a dozen the last 2 months and have a little bigger body of knowledge to draw from. When a buyer walks once from a transaction the likelihood they will do it again is relatively high. I know hundreds of productive agents and every one of them will tell you the same. I’m guessing the the property was located soemwhere where the RE is a wee less active than around here where the market is full of flaky buyers. The contract in CA caters to flaky buyers and they can easily walk with no financial loss where as that is not so easy in other places. Having a committed buyer is as important as having a qualified buyer in a market like this.
January 19, 2011 at 4:04 PM #656057sdrealtorParticipantCongratulations! However I have been involved in about a dozen the last 2 months and have a little bigger body of knowledge to draw from. When a buyer walks once from a transaction the likelihood they will do it again is relatively high. I know hundreds of productive agents and every one of them will tell you the same. I’m guessing the the property was located soemwhere where the RE is a wee less active than around here where the market is full of flaky buyers. The contract in CA caters to flaky buyers and they can easily walk with no financial loss where as that is not so easy in other places. Having a committed buyer is as important as having a qualified buyer in a market like this.
January 19, 2011 at 4:04 PM #656655sdrealtorParticipantCongratulations! However I have been involved in about a dozen the last 2 months and have a little bigger body of knowledge to draw from. When a buyer walks once from a transaction the likelihood they will do it again is relatively high. I know hundreds of productive agents and every one of them will tell you the same. I’m guessing the the property was located soemwhere where the RE is a wee less active than around here where the market is full of flaky buyers. The contract in CA caters to flaky buyers and they can easily walk with no financial loss where as that is not so easy in other places. Having a committed buyer is as important as having a qualified buyer in a market like this.
January 19, 2011 at 4:04 PM #656793sdrealtorParticipantCongratulations! However I have been involved in about a dozen the last 2 months and have a little bigger body of knowledge to draw from. When a buyer walks once from a transaction the likelihood they will do it again is relatively high. I know hundreds of productive agents and every one of them will tell you the same. I’m guessing the the property was located soemwhere where the RE is a wee less active than around here where the market is full of flaky buyers. The contract in CA caters to flaky buyers and they can easily walk with no financial loss where as that is not so easy in other places. Having a committed buyer is as important as having a qualified buyer in a market like this.
January 19, 2011 at 4:04 PM #657123sdrealtorParticipantCongratulations! However I have been involved in about a dozen the last 2 months and have a little bigger body of knowledge to draw from. When a buyer walks once from a transaction the likelihood they will do it again is relatively high. I know hundreds of productive agents and every one of them will tell you the same. I’m guessing the the property was located soemwhere where the RE is a wee less active than around here where the market is full of flaky buyers. The contract in CA caters to flaky buyers and they can easily walk with no financial loss where as that is not so easy in other places. Having a committed buyer is as important as having a qualified buyer in a market like this.
January 19, 2011 at 6:28 PM #656086TillersParticipantDon’t worry about hurting the Realtors feelings, it’s a business decision on your part.
I know a couple who offered 415 on a short sale. Retracted their offer and came back with 365 and got the house at the lower price! The whole process took about a year, but that seems to be the norm with SS.
So, it doesn’t hurt to try!!
January 19, 2011 at 6:28 PM #656147TillersParticipantDon’t worry about hurting the Realtors feelings, it’s a business decision on your part.
I know a couple who offered 415 on a short sale. Retracted their offer and came back with 365 and got the house at the lower price! The whole process took about a year, but that seems to be the norm with SS.
So, it doesn’t hurt to try!!
January 19, 2011 at 6:28 PM #656745TillersParticipantDon’t worry about hurting the Realtors feelings, it’s a business decision on your part.
I know a couple who offered 415 on a short sale. Retracted their offer and came back with 365 and got the house at the lower price! The whole process took about a year, but that seems to be the norm with SS.
So, it doesn’t hurt to try!!
January 19, 2011 at 6:28 PM #656883TillersParticipantDon’t worry about hurting the Realtors feelings, it’s a business decision on your part.
I know a couple who offered 415 on a short sale. Retracted their offer and came back with 365 and got the house at the lower price! The whole process took about a year, but that seems to be the norm with SS.
So, it doesn’t hurt to try!!
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.