Is the Goverment trying to shutup Mark Cuban?

[Chris Scoreboard Johnston]

Not buying any stocks yet, I need a buy signal in the SP 500 before going into indiv stocks that I think are undervalued. I am looking for another leg down, but if this triple bottom does hold I will look for longs in stocks. The problem AA may have is the 92 billion of commodities positions still held by funds that need to be liquidated. This will effect all companies with raw material exposure like AA. It is however the most undervalued stock in the Dow by the numbers.

Hannity has just been very outspoken against the president elect, so that was kind of a joke, but if the paranoid people are right and they are going to try and silence opposition, he is certainly a logical stealth target for them to go after. I don’t buy into this but the basic theme of this thread was kind of a comspiracy theory so I threw that out as a joke. I have seriously considered taking a good chunk of money and parking it out of this country just in case the worst case scenario played out. I thought he might also as I would imagine he has a good chunk.

[larrylujack]

[quote=equalizer][quote=Chris Scoreboard Johnston]He will always be a target because he is high profile and is a loud mouth. People in power never like people like him. Let’s just see maybe he actually did something wrong. Cases or investigations like this are not launched frivilously. The govt usually has someone nailed before they go after them on this count. If they were trying to spank him, they would have gone after him in a different way, audits etc..

I am interested to see if Sean Hannity winds up on the run once the new administration takes over. If I were him I would have stashed a mill or two outside of the country just in case.[/quote]

Liberal loudmouths who ridicule Govt officials and finance left-wing hate movies are going to get the attention of hundreds of regulators who will spend millions of dollars to come after you. And this case look like a slam dunk. Now all your critics like Hannity will be totally vindicated and you will have brought shame to your fans. Thanks, pal.

Are you buying AA yet? Maybe with a $10 Jan 2010 covered call to get $3.

[/quote]

I doubt that Cuban fit into your category of loud mouth liberals who ridicule the government and movies. Actually, financially Cuban does quite well, and he is no liberal, and it is likely he will serve time to be like Martha Stewart, inspite. so I think yer arrow missed the mark and you are quite confused, as I doubt he needs your assistance. But I suppose the wannabes defend poor Mark Cuban because you sense you have a shot, albeit a verry long shot.

are you another wannabe I suppose? I mean really, who cares…

.

[larrylujack]

[quote=equalizer][quote=Chris Scoreboard Johnston]He will always be a target because he is high profile and is a loud mouth. People in power never like people like him. Let’s just see maybe he actually did something wrong. Cases or investigations like this are not launched frivilously. The govt usually has someone nailed before they go after them on this count. If they were trying to spank him, they would have gone after him in a different way, audits etc..

I am interested to see if Sean Hannity winds up on the run once the new administration takes over. If I were him I would have stashed a mill or two outside of the country just in case.[/quote]

Liberal loudmouths who ridicule Govt officials and finance left-wing hate movies are going to get the attention of hundreds of regulators who will spend millions of dollars to come after you. And this case look like a slam dunk. Now all your critics like Hannity will be totally vindicated and you will have brought shame to your fans. Thanks, pal.

Are you buying AA yet? Maybe with a $10 Jan 2010 covered call to get $3.

[/quote]

I doubt that Cuban fit into your category of loud mouth liberals who ridicule the government and movies. Actually, financially Cuban does quite well, and he is no liberal, and it is likely he will serve time to be like Martha Stewart, inspite. so I think yer arrow missed the mark and you are quite confused, as I doubt he needs your assistance. But I suppose the wannabes defend poor Mark Cuban because you sense you have a shot, albeit a verry long shot.

are you another wannabe I suppose? I mean really, who cares…

.

[larrylujack]

[quote=equalizer][quote=Chris Scoreboard Johnston]He will always be a target because he is high profile and is a loud mouth. People in power never like people like him. Let’s just see maybe he actually did something wrong. Cases or investigations like this are not launched frivilously. The govt usually has someone nailed before they go after them on this count. If they were trying to spank him, they would have gone after him in a different way, audits etc..

I am interested to see if Sean Hannity winds up on the run once the new administration takes over. If I were him I would have stashed a mill or two outside of the country just in case.[/quote]

Liberal loudmouths who ridicule Govt officials and finance left-wing hate movies are going to get the attention of hundreds of regulators who will spend millions of dollars to come after you. And this case look like a slam dunk. Now all your critics like Hannity will be totally vindicated and you will have brought shame to your fans. Thanks, pal.

Are you buying AA yet? Maybe with a $10 Jan 2010 covered call to get $3.

[/quote]

I doubt that Cuban fit into your category of loud mouth liberals who ridicule the government and movies. Actually, financially Cuban does quite well, and he is no liberal, and it is likely he will serve time to be like Martha Stewart, inspite. so I think yer arrow missed the mark and you are quite confused, as I doubt he needs your assistance. But I suppose the wannabes defend poor Mark Cuban because you sense you have a shot, albeit a verry long shot.

are you another wannabe I suppose? I mean really, who cares…

.

[larrylujack]

[quote=equalizer][quote=Chris Scoreboard Johnston]He will always be a target because he is high profile and is a loud mouth. People in power never like people like him. Let’s just see maybe he actually did something wrong. Cases or investigations like this are not launched frivilously. The govt usually has someone nailed before they go after them on this count. If they were trying to spank him, they would have gone after him in a different way, audits etc..

I am interested to see if Sean Hannity winds up on the run once the new administration takes over. If I were him I would have stashed a mill or two outside of the country just in case.[/quote]

Liberal loudmouths who ridicule Govt officials and finance left-wing hate movies are going to get the attention of hundreds of regulators who will spend millions of dollars to come after you. And this case look like a slam dunk. Now all your critics like Hannity will be totally vindicated and you will have brought shame to your fans. Thanks, pal.

Are you buying AA yet? Maybe with a $10 Jan 2010 covered call to get $3.

[/quote]

I doubt that Cuban fit into your category of loud mouth liberals who ridicule the government and movies. Actually, financially Cuban does quite well, and he is no liberal, and it is likely he will serve time to be like Martha Stewart, inspite. so I think yer arrow missed the mark and you are quite confused, as I doubt he needs your assistance. But I suppose the wannabes defend poor Mark Cuban because you sense you have a shot, albeit a verry long shot.

are you another wannabe I suppose? I mean really, who cares…

.

[larrylujack]

[quote=equalizer][quote=Chris Scoreboard Johnston]He will always be a target because he is high profile and is a loud mouth. People in power never like people like him. Let’s just see maybe he actually did something wrong. Cases or investigations like this are not launched frivilously. The govt usually has someone nailed before they go after them on this count. If they were trying to spank him, they would have gone after him in a different way, audits etc..

I am interested to see if Sean Hannity winds up on the run once the new administration takes over. If I were him I would have stashed a mill or two outside of the country just in case.[/quote]

Liberal loudmouths who ridicule Govt officials and finance left-wing hate movies are going to get the attention of hundreds of regulators who will spend millions of dollars to come after you. And this case look like a slam dunk. Now all your critics like Hannity will be totally vindicated and you will have brought shame to your fans. Thanks, pal.

Are you buying AA yet? Maybe with a $10 Jan 2010 covered call to get $3.

[/quote]

I doubt that Cuban fit into your category of loud mouth liberals who ridicule the government and movies. Actually, financially Cuban does quite well, and he is no liberal, and it is likely he will serve time to be like Martha Stewart, inspite. so I think yer arrow missed the mark and you are quite confused, as I doubt he needs your assistance. But I suppose the wannabes defend poor Mark Cuban because you sense you have a shot, albeit a verry long shot.

are you another wannabe I suppose? I mean really, who cares…

.

[equalizer]

LL,

Chill out. I think you are take my rants too literally, they are laced with satire. I’m not dumb enough to take on Cuban, a bright if impetuous businessman. His HDNET channels were visionary. Now his mamma stock was just sucker bet, don’t know why he went there.

His is just a civil case for now, but his defense is selective prosecution, not denial.

Check out this note here at NYT and tell me if I missed the mark or was just prescient. Or maybe I had insider info that I leaked to my man Floyd.

http://norris.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/11/17/insider-trading-or-political-persecution/

[equalizer]

LL,

Chill out. I think you are take my rants too literally, they are laced with satire. I’m not dumb enough to take on Cuban, a bright if impetuous businessman. His HDNET channels were visionary. Now his mamma stock was just sucker bet, don’t know why he went there.

His is just a civil case for now, but his defense is selective prosecution, not denial.

Check out this note here at NYT and tell me if I missed the mark or was just prescient. Or maybe I had insider info that I leaked to my man Floyd.

http://norris.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/11/17/insider-trading-or-political-persecution/

[equalizer]

LL,

Chill out. I think you are take my rants too literally, they are laced with satire. I’m not dumb enough to take on Cuban, a bright if impetuous businessman. His HDNET channels were visionary. Now his mamma stock was just sucker bet, don’t know why he went there.

His is just a civil case for now, but his defense is selective prosecution, not denial.

Check out this note here at NYT and tell me if I missed the mark or was just prescient. Or maybe I had insider info that I leaked to my man Floyd.

http://norris.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/11/17/insider-trading-or-political-persecution/

[equalizer]

LL,

Chill out. I think you are take my rants too literally, they are laced with satire. I’m not dumb enough to take on Cuban, a bright if impetuous businessman. His HDNET channels were visionary. Now his mamma stock was just sucker bet, don’t know why he went there.

His is just a civil case for now, but his defense is selective prosecution, not denial.

Check out this note here at NYT and tell me if I missed the mark or was just prescient. Or maybe I had insider info that I leaked to my man Floyd.

http://norris.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/11/17/insider-trading-or-political-persecution/

[equalizer]

LL,

Chill out. I think you are take my rants too literally, they are laced with satire. I’m not dumb enough to take on Cuban, a bright if impetuous businessman. His HDNET channels were visionary. Now his mamma stock was just sucker bet, don’t know why he went there.

His is just a civil case for now, but his defense is selective prosecution, not denial.

Check out this note here at NYT and tell me if I missed the mark or was just prescient. Or maybe I had insider info that I leaked to my man Floyd.

http://norris.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/11/17/insider-trading-or-political-persecution/

[Author]

Posts