Menu

Home › Forums › Housing › Is it possible to assume a properties old prop 13 tax rate?

Viewing 6 posts - 46 through 51 (of 51 total)
1 2 3 4
  • Author
    Posts
  • June 3, 2010 at 11:43 PM #560402
    bearishgurl
    Participant

    I meant . . . “conveying the property to the lessee” . . . lol!

    jpinpb, your idea is legal. One can adopt and then leave their Prop. 13 eligible property to their “adopted” heir 🙂

    June 4, 2010 at 6:22 AM #559446
    jpinpb
    Participant

    Well, then, there you go. No law about adopting. There’s the back door. Heck, w/the way investments are looking for some retired folks, offering them some money for adoption might be appealing and a win-win for both parties. Government loses out on revenue. But w/the way they’re handling finances, that does not trouble me much.

    Not to go off on a tangent (I hope not to thread hijack) I was driving around 4$ last week and noticed the streets are not much better than driving around PB. Honestly. City complains Prop 13 is why the streets are in bad shape. Setting aside the fact of the low percentage of people who actually are paying low taxes since this re bubble, people in 4$ are also paying MR. You’d think in a new neighborhood their streets would be perfect.

    June 4, 2010 at 6:22 AM #559548
    jpinpb
    Participant

    Well, then, there you go. No law about adopting. There’s the back door. Heck, w/the way investments are looking for some retired folks, offering them some money for adoption might be appealing and a win-win for both parties. Government loses out on revenue. But w/the way they’re handling finances, that does not trouble me much.

    Not to go off on a tangent (I hope not to thread hijack) I was driving around 4$ last week and noticed the streets are not much better than driving around PB. Honestly. City complains Prop 13 is why the streets are in bad shape. Setting aside the fact of the low percentage of people who actually are paying low taxes since this re bubble, people in 4$ are also paying MR. You’d think in a new neighborhood their streets would be perfect.

    June 4, 2010 at 6:22 AM #560044
    jpinpb
    Participant

    Well, then, there you go. No law about adopting. There’s the back door. Heck, w/the way investments are looking for some retired folks, offering them some money for adoption might be appealing and a win-win for both parties. Government loses out on revenue. But w/the way they’re handling finances, that does not trouble me much.

    Not to go off on a tangent (I hope not to thread hijack) I was driving around 4$ last week and noticed the streets are not much better than driving around PB. Honestly. City complains Prop 13 is why the streets are in bad shape. Setting aside the fact of the low percentage of people who actually are paying low taxes since this re bubble, people in 4$ are also paying MR. You’d think in a new neighborhood their streets would be perfect.

    June 4, 2010 at 6:22 AM #560147
    jpinpb
    Participant

    Well, then, there you go. No law about adopting. There’s the back door. Heck, w/the way investments are looking for some retired folks, offering them some money for adoption might be appealing and a win-win for both parties. Government loses out on revenue. But w/the way they’re handling finances, that does not trouble me much.

    Not to go off on a tangent (I hope not to thread hijack) I was driving around 4$ last week and noticed the streets are not much better than driving around PB. Honestly. City complains Prop 13 is why the streets are in bad shape. Setting aside the fact of the low percentage of people who actually are paying low taxes since this re bubble, people in 4$ are also paying MR. You’d think in a new neighborhood their streets would be perfect.

    June 4, 2010 at 6:22 AM #560427
    jpinpb
    Participant

    Well, then, there you go. No law about adopting. There’s the back door. Heck, w/the way investments are looking for some retired folks, offering them some money for adoption might be appealing and a win-win for both parties. Government loses out on revenue. But w/the way they’re handling finances, that does not trouble me much.

    Not to go off on a tangent (I hope not to thread hijack) I was driving around 4$ last week and noticed the streets are not much better than driving around PB. Honestly. City complains Prop 13 is why the streets are in bad shape. Setting aside the fact of the low percentage of people who actually are paying low taxes since this re bubble, people in 4$ are also paying MR. You’d think in a new neighborhood their streets would be perfect.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 6 posts - 46 through 51 (of 51 total)
1 2 3 4
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.