Investing with neural networks

[asragov]

One of the better programs for trading using neural networks is probably:

http://www.neuroshell.com/

There is also:

http://www.tradingsolutions.com/

I personally have not found this approach to be very useful, feeling that it is really doing more curve fitting to the past, and not being of much predictive value.

I personally like TradeGuider, which looks at volume spread analysis (market manipulation). There is an end-of-day version and a real-time version:

http://www.tradeguider.com/softwaresystems/tour_software.aspx

For longer-term position trading, you might find this one interesting:

http://www.stockmarketmirror.com/

[(former)FormerSanDiegan]

Neural nets are only good at establishing patterns for which they have been trained from input data. They are only as good as that training data. Having worked with them and having programmed a rudimentary 2-layer neural net in college, I will personally never consider using them for investment purposes.

[(former)FormerSanDiegan]

Neural nets are only good at establishing patterns for which they have been trained from input data. They are only as good as that training data. Having worked with them and having programmed a rudimentary 2-layer neural net in college, I will personally never consider using them for investment purposes.

[(former)FormerSanDiegan]

Neural nets are only good at establishing patterns for which they have been trained from input data. They are only as good as that training data. Having worked with them and having programmed a rudimentary 2-layer neural net in college, I will personally never consider using them for investment purposes.

[(former)FormerSanDiegan]

Neural nets are only good at establishing patterns for which they have been trained from input data. They are only as good as that training data. Having worked with them and having programmed a rudimentary 2-layer neural net in college, I will personally never consider using them for investment purposes.

[(former)FormerSanDiegan]

Neural nets are only good at establishing patterns for which they have been trained from input data. They are only as good as that training data. Having worked with them and having programmed a rudimentary 2-layer neural net in college, I will personally never consider using them for investment purposes.

[kewp]

Having worked with them and having programmed a rudimentary 2-layer neural net in college, I will personally never consider using them for investment purposes.

It’s been said in the AI community that neural nets are always the ‘second best’ solution. Meaning, that a well-groomed expert system will always beat them.

That said, they still have some value in tuning/optimizing existing systems. But I think the focus is more on genetic algorithms these days.

[kewp]

Having worked with them and having programmed a rudimentary 2-layer neural net in college, I will personally never consider using them for investment purposes.

It’s been said in the AI community that neural nets are always the ‘second best’ solution. Meaning, that a well-groomed expert system will always beat them.

That said, they still have some value in tuning/optimizing existing systems. But I think the focus is more on genetic algorithms these days.

[kewp]

Having worked with them and having programmed a rudimentary 2-layer neural net in college, I will personally never consider using them for investment purposes.

It’s been said in the AI community that neural nets are always the ‘second best’ solution. Meaning, that a well-groomed expert system will always beat them.

That said, they still have some value in tuning/optimizing existing systems. But I think the focus is more on genetic algorithms these days.

[kewp]

Having worked with them and having programmed a rudimentary 2-layer neural net in college, I will personally never consider using them for investment purposes.

It’s been said in the AI community that neural nets are always the ‘second best’ solution. Meaning, that a well-groomed expert system will always beat them.

That said, they still have some value in tuning/optimizing existing systems. But I think the focus is more on genetic algorithms these days.

[kewp]

Having worked with them and having programmed a rudimentary 2-layer neural net in college, I will personally never consider using them for investment purposes.

It’s been said in the AI community that neural nets are always the ‘second best’ solution. Meaning, that a well-groomed expert system will always beat them.

That said, they still have some value in tuning/optimizing existing systems. But I think the focus is more on genetic algorithms these days.

[Ash Housewares]

It’s been said in the AI community that neural nets are always the ‘second best’ solution. Meaning, that a well-groomed expert system will always beat them.

That’s interesting, the book I’m reading now claims just the opposite. In “Super Crunchers: How Thinking by Numbers is the new way to be Smart” by Ayres he describes how algorithms beat human experts in field after field, whether it’s predicting the future success of baseball players, if a particular vintage wine will be good, or how the Chief Justices will vote in a court case. In test after test, the algorithms beat the experts.

[Ash Housewares]

It’s been said in the AI community that neural nets are always the ‘second best’ solution. Meaning, that a well-groomed expert system will always beat them.

That’s interesting, the book I’m reading now claims just the opposite. In “Super Crunchers: How Thinking by Numbers is the new way to be Smart” by Ayres he describes how algorithms beat human experts in field after field, whether it’s predicting the future success of baseball players, if a particular vintage wine will be good, or how the Chief Justices will vote in a court case. In test after test, the algorithms beat the experts.

[Ash Housewares]

It’s been said in the AI community that neural nets are always the ‘second best’ solution. Meaning, that a well-groomed expert system will always beat them.

That’s interesting, the book I’m reading now claims just the opposite. In “Super Crunchers: How Thinking by Numbers is the new way to be Smart” by Ayres he describes how algorithms beat human experts in field after field, whether it’s predicting the future success of baseball players, if a particular vintage wine will be good, or how the Chief Justices will vote in a court case. In test after test, the algorithms beat the experts.

[Ash Housewares]

It’s been said in the AI community that neural nets are always the ‘second best’ solution. Meaning, that a well-groomed expert system will always beat them.

That’s interesting, the book I’m reading now claims just the opposite. In “Super Crunchers: How Thinking by Numbers is the new way to be Smart” by Ayres he describes how algorithms beat human experts in field after field, whether it’s predicting the future success of baseball players, if a particular vintage wine will be good, or how the Chief Justices will vote in a court case. In test after test, the algorithms beat the experts.

[Author]

Posts