Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › INV: Denninger Rocks!!!
- This topic has 40 replies, 7 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 6 months ago by lonestar2000.
-
AuthorPosts
-
November 19, 2008 at 3:17 PM #307691November 19, 2008 at 4:30 PM #307291jpinpbParticipant
That was a quite to the point, appropriate gesture.
November 19, 2008 at 4:30 PM #307660jpinpbParticipantThat was a quite to the point, appropriate gesture.
November 19, 2008 at 4:30 PM #307673jpinpbParticipantThat was a quite to the point, appropriate gesture.
November 19, 2008 at 4:30 PM #307694jpinpbParticipantThat was a quite to the point, appropriate gesture.
November 19, 2008 at 4:30 PM #307757jpinpbParticipantThat was a quite to the point, appropriate gesture.
November 19, 2008 at 8:12 PM #307361barnaby33ParticipantDWCAP, I think that sums it up nicely. Keynesian stimulus would work wonders, if we hadn’t already been doing it every year pretty much for the last 40.
If we hadn’t we wouldn’t be in this mess, but by all means lets listen to Paul Krugman et al. As everyone knows, Nobel prize winners don’t have an agenda and speech writers for Nixon inherently have their pulse on the heart of the finance based economy.
Josh
November 19, 2008 at 8:12 PM #307731barnaby33ParticipantDWCAP, I think that sums it up nicely. Keynesian stimulus would work wonders, if we hadn’t already been doing it every year pretty much for the last 40.
If we hadn’t we wouldn’t be in this mess, but by all means lets listen to Paul Krugman et al. As everyone knows, Nobel prize winners don’t have an agenda and speech writers for Nixon inherently have their pulse on the heart of the finance based economy.
Josh
November 19, 2008 at 8:12 PM #307744barnaby33ParticipantDWCAP, I think that sums it up nicely. Keynesian stimulus would work wonders, if we hadn’t already been doing it every year pretty much for the last 40.
If we hadn’t we wouldn’t be in this mess, but by all means lets listen to Paul Krugman et al. As everyone knows, Nobel prize winners don’t have an agenda and speech writers for Nixon inherently have their pulse on the heart of the finance based economy.
Josh
November 19, 2008 at 8:12 PM #307765barnaby33ParticipantDWCAP, I think that sums it up nicely. Keynesian stimulus would work wonders, if we hadn’t already been doing it every year pretty much for the last 40.
If we hadn’t we wouldn’t be in this mess, but by all means lets listen to Paul Krugman et al. As everyone knows, Nobel prize winners don’t have an agenda and speech writers for Nixon inherently have their pulse on the heart of the finance based economy.
Josh
November 19, 2008 at 8:12 PM #307827barnaby33ParticipantDWCAP, I think that sums it up nicely. Keynesian stimulus would work wonders, if we hadn’t already been doing it every year pretty much for the last 40.
If we hadn’t we wouldn’t be in this mess, but by all means lets listen to Paul Krugman et al. As everyone knows, Nobel prize winners don’t have an agenda and speech writers for Nixon inherently have their pulse on the heart of the finance based economy.
Josh
November 19, 2008 at 11:54 PM #307441poorsaverParticipantI’ve been reading the Market Ticker for over a year now, and I have to admit that for the most part, Karl’s been spot on. Some of his political observations are a bit over the top, but I can’t fault him for his market perceptions. Scary thing is that he feels our economy is going into a depression, possibly to exceed GD1, due to the failed policies of our gov’t. If that prediction/observation comes true, then what’s to prevent house prices coming down 90 percent, as they did in the 30’s? I’ve heard that some houses (not like the ones in Detroit) were selling for $100. Adjust that for today’s dollars, and houses could be as cheap as $10,000. For real.
November 19, 2008 at 11:54 PM #307811poorsaverParticipantI’ve been reading the Market Ticker for over a year now, and I have to admit that for the most part, Karl’s been spot on. Some of his political observations are a bit over the top, but I can’t fault him for his market perceptions. Scary thing is that he feels our economy is going into a depression, possibly to exceed GD1, due to the failed policies of our gov’t. If that prediction/observation comes true, then what’s to prevent house prices coming down 90 percent, as they did in the 30’s? I’ve heard that some houses (not like the ones in Detroit) were selling for $100. Adjust that for today’s dollars, and houses could be as cheap as $10,000. For real.
November 19, 2008 at 11:54 PM #307825poorsaverParticipantI’ve been reading the Market Ticker for over a year now, and I have to admit that for the most part, Karl’s been spot on. Some of his political observations are a bit over the top, but I can’t fault him for his market perceptions. Scary thing is that he feels our economy is going into a depression, possibly to exceed GD1, due to the failed policies of our gov’t. If that prediction/observation comes true, then what’s to prevent house prices coming down 90 percent, as they did in the 30’s? I’ve heard that some houses (not like the ones in Detroit) were selling for $100. Adjust that for today’s dollars, and houses could be as cheap as $10,000. For real.
November 19, 2008 at 11:54 PM #307844poorsaverParticipantI’ve been reading the Market Ticker for over a year now, and I have to admit that for the most part, Karl’s been spot on. Some of his political observations are a bit over the top, but I can’t fault him for his market perceptions. Scary thing is that he feels our economy is going into a depression, possibly to exceed GD1, due to the failed policies of our gov’t. If that prediction/observation comes true, then what’s to prevent house prices coming down 90 percent, as they did in the 30’s? I’ve heard that some houses (not like the ones in Detroit) were selling for $100. Adjust that for today’s dollars, and houses could be as cheap as $10,000. For real.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.