Home › Forums › Closed Forums › Properties or Areas › Interesting property up for trustee sale today…
- This topic has 45 replies, 5 voices, and was last updated 14 years ago by
UCGal.
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 4, 2010 at 3:21 PM #17411May 4, 2010 at 3:55 PM #546339
SD Realtor
ParticipantTo lazy to look but did you make sure that the foreclosing bene was the first? At that low of a bid it seems like it was the second at least. Just a guess…
You know the saying, if it looks to good to be true then it is. No way the sharks let this go.
May 4, 2010 at 3:55 PM #546451ParticipantTo lazy to look but did you make sure that the foreclosing bene was the first? At that low of a bid it seems like it was the second at least. Just a guess…
You know the saying, if it looks to good to be true then it is. No way the sharks let this go.
May 4, 2010 at 3:55 PM #546932ParticipantTo lazy to look but did you make sure that the foreclosing bene was the first? At that low of a bid it seems like it was the second at least. Just a guess…
You know the saying, if it looks to good to be true then it is. No way the sharks let this go.
May 4, 2010 at 3:55 PM #547029ParticipantTo lazy to look but did you make sure that the foreclosing bene was the first? At that low of a bid it seems like it was the second at least. Just a guess…
You know the saying, if it looks to good to be true then it is. No way the sharks let this go.
May 4, 2010 at 3:55 PM #547301ParticipantTo lazy to look but did you make sure that the foreclosing bene was the first? At that low of a bid it seems like it was the second at least. Just a guess…
You know the saying, if it looks to good to be true then it is. No way the sharks let this go.
May 4, 2010 at 4:45 PM #546344UCGal
ParticipantThat makes sense… it probably was the 2nd.
May 4, 2010 at 4:45 PM #546456ParticipantThat makes sense… it probably was the 2nd.
May 4, 2010 at 4:45 PM #546937ParticipantThat makes sense… it probably was the 2nd.
May 4, 2010 at 4:45 PM #547034ParticipantThat makes sense… it probably was the 2nd.
May 4, 2010 at 4:45 PM #547306ParticipantThat makes sense… it probably was the 2nd.
May 4, 2010 at 5:09 PM #546354Eugene
Participant[quote]Did someone miss a bargain lot? (I have no idea.)[/quote]
Nope. This could be yours for 595 without the hassle of going to the trustee sale and then razing the remains of a burnt-down megamansion.
This is probably the most remote lot in all of “Rancho Santa Fe”, 15 minutes to the nearest grocery store and 20 minutes to the nearest freeway.
May 4, 2010 at 5:09 PM #546466Participant[quote]Did someone miss a bargain lot? (I have no idea.)[/quote]
Nope. This could be yours for 595 without the hassle of going to the trustee sale and then razing the remains of a burnt-down megamansion.
This is probably the most remote lot in all of “Rancho Santa Fe”, 15 minutes to the nearest grocery store and 20 minutes to the nearest freeway.
May 4, 2010 at 5:09 PM #546947Participant[quote]Did someone miss a bargain lot? (I have no idea.)[/quote]
Nope. This could be yours for 595 without the hassle of going to the trustee sale and then razing the remains of a burnt-down megamansion.
This is probably the most remote lot in all of “Rancho Santa Fe”, 15 minutes to the nearest grocery store and 20 minutes to the nearest freeway.
May 4, 2010 at 5:09 PM #547044Participant[quote]Did someone miss a bargain lot? (I have no idea.)[/quote]
Nope. This could be yours for 595 without the hassle of going to the trustee sale and then razing the remains of a burnt-down megamansion.
This is probably the most remote lot in all of “Rancho Santa Fe”, 15 minutes to the nearest grocery store and 20 minutes to the nearest freeway.
-
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘Properties or Areas’ is closed to new topics and replies.