- This topic has 38 replies, 7 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 9 months ago by Allan from Fallbrook.
-
AuthorPosts
-
July 28, 2007 at 11:19 PM #68510July 28, 2007 at 11:41 PM #68447Allan from FallbrookParticipant
I read a real good article today juxtaposing the LBO frenzy of the 1980s with the nonsense happening in the CDO/CDS markets. The essence of the article was the massive creation of unserviceable debt, the enrichment of a few key players and the lasting fallout following the crash.
Another article talked about the faltering stock price of Blackstone following their IPO and that investors are suddenly more wary than they were even a few months before.
It appears we are on the cusp of a credit squeeze, if not an outright credit crunch. Bernanke is doing his level best to stay away from rate hikes, but at some point it appears that interest rates will rise again. Combined with upcoming rate resets this summer and next, this might be the final nail in the coffin.
I am certainly not an alarmist, but admittedly bearish by nature, and this all has the hallmarks of a true blowout. NODs, NOTs and foreclosures are all up by several hundred percent and I don’t think we have even seen the worst yet.
July 28, 2007 at 11:41 PM #68516Allan from FallbrookParticipantI read a real good article today juxtaposing the LBO frenzy of the 1980s with the nonsense happening in the CDO/CDS markets. The essence of the article was the massive creation of unserviceable debt, the enrichment of a few key players and the lasting fallout following the crash.
Another article talked about the faltering stock price of Blackstone following their IPO and that investors are suddenly more wary than they were even a few months before.
It appears we are on the cusp of a credit squeeze, if not an outright credit crunch. Bernanke is doing his level best to stay away from rate hikes, but at some point it appears that interest rates will rise again. Combined with upcoming rate resets this summer and next, this might be the final nail in the coffin.
I am certainly not an alarmist, but admittedly bearish by nature, and this all has the hallmarks of a true blowout. NODs, NOTs and foreclosures are all up by several hundred percent and I don’t think we have even seen the worst yet.
July 28, 2007 at 11:52 PM #68449NotCrankyParticipantI hate to see this eclectic area get a bad rap, or a lukewarm review, even though I can absolutely see it is not everyone’s cup of tea. It is an extremely good location geographically speaking.Easy access to all kinds of nice places, education, health and and employment centers. There are many interesting people and businesses.It has one of the best “micro climates” in the county. There are trade offs, for some,the mostly questionable housing stock and a other negatives are worth it. I spent most of the last 25 years living in a few of these zip codes.
July 28, 2007 at 11:52 PM #68518NotCrankyParticipantI hate to see this eclectic area get a bad rap, or a lukewarm review, even though I can absolutely see it is not everyone’s cup of tea. It is an extremely good location geographically speaking.Easy access to all kinds of nice places, education, health and and employment centers. There are many interesting people and businesses.It has one of the best “micro climates” in the county. There are trade offs, for some,the mostly questionable housing stock and a other negatives are worth it. I spent most of the last 25 years living in a few of these zip codes.
July 29, 2007 at 9:01 PM #68607JCParticipantAgreed, these areas aren’t perfect, but they do have a lot to offer. There are some really nice parts of NP and University Heights and I’ve found both of these neighborhoods to be much friendlier than the beaches or the UTC area (nice areas too). Thank you so much for all of the input. π
BTW, I realize that I did not ask my original question appropriately. I was not looking for a professional opinion on the value of that particular home (was not looking for info that shouldn’t be posted on a public forum). I was just looking for gut reaction to what folks would pay for something like that as I just can’t imagine anyone paying anywhere close to the list price. However, I guess that can be said for many properties on the market right now…….
July 29, 2007 at 9:01 PM #68676JCParticipantAgreed, these areas aren’t perfect, but they do have a lot to offer. There are some really nice parts of NP and University Heights and I’ve found both of these neighborhoods to be much friendlier than the beaches or the UTC area (nice areas too). Thank you so much for all of the input. π
BTW, I realize that I did not ask my original question appropriately. I was not looking for a professional opinion on the value of that particular home (was not looking for info that shouldn’t be posted on a public forum). I was just looking for gut reaction to what folks would pay for something like that as I just can’t imagine anyone paying anywhere close to the list price. However, I guess that can be said for many properties on the market right now…….
July 29, 2007 at 9:41 PM #68615Allan from FallbrookParticipantI was talking with a buddy of mine in the SF/Bay Area and he was telling me about four parcels of land in the Los Altos Hills area (near Palo Alto). There are three 14,000sf lots and one 16,000sf lot. They are priced at $2MM each. That’s right: Each. For just the land.
If you look at properties in the Marin County area, you are still finding houses priced in the $900/sf to $1,200/sf range.
While it appears that this insanity is starting to unwind, there are still parts of California where it appears that pricing is not only stickier than imagined, but it is holding steady.
As ScruffyDog opined elsewhere on the blog, LA Metro is still solid. While I agree that LA is probably lagging San Diego by about a year, pricing variations are still puzzling.
July 29, 2007 at 9:41 PM #68684Allan from FallbrookParticipantI was talking with a buddy of mine in the SF/Bay Area and he was telling me about four parcels of land in the Los Altos Hills area (near Palo Alto). There are three 14,000sf lots and one 16,000sf lot. They are priced at $2MM each. That’s right: Each. For just the land.
If you look at properties in the Marin County area, you are still finding houses priced in the $900/sf to $1,200/sf range.
While it appears that this insanity is starting to unwind, there are still parts of California where it appears that pricing is not only stickier than imagined, but it is holding steady.
As ScruffyDog opined elsewhere on the blog, LA Metro is still solid. While I agree that LA is probably lagging San Diego by about a year, pricing variations are still puzzling.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.