If you had a choice between Ron Paul and Ron Paul, which Ron Paul would you choose?

[sdduuuude]

It’s username mayhem. Pretty funny.

If I’m getting this right, MM changed to MM. then someone else stole MM. And harvey is pri_dick but isn’t a dick ? I wasn’t fooled by the name, but by the fairly reasonable demeanor of harvey. If only changing personalities was as easy as changing a name …

[Anonymous]

Have faith, people can change!

My cousin’s ex-husband in the Bay Area was a real loser who into petty theft, sold drugs, and was just a general con man. He would lie to just about anybody and try just about anything to make a quick buck.

His dad died a few months back and he inherited the family business. He’s going to take it over.

It’s a meat-packing plant just outside Fresno.

Now that he’s in the food business I’m sure his crooked ways are over, I’m sure he understands what is good for business.

There’s no need for anyone to keep an eye on what he does. We can trust him.

Enjoy the weekend, looks like great weather for a BBQ!

[scaredyclassic]

scaredycat = walterwhite = squat250.

I will squat 5 sets of 5 reps at 250 butt down to the bucket by the end of the year.

say hasta lavista to walter.

[bearishgurl]

[quote=squat250]scaredycat = walterwhite = squat250.

I will squat 5 sets of 5 reps at 250 butt down to the bucket by the end of the year.

say hasta lavista to walter.[/quote]

squat250 is more fitting. The “new you” is not a scaredycat anymore and “Walter” is boring.

[fat_lazy_union]

Hasta la vista baby

[fat_lazy_union]

Hasta la vista baby

[Rich Toscano]

[quote=sdduuuude]Whoever you are, please stop. Rich isn’t going to ban the actual markmax33 just because you add a period to the end of a username and post this stuff.[/quote]

Yes, good point… but I did ban him because after I posted this (the second time I’d made this request):

I’m going to ask you — once again — to not post these dedicated Ron Paul cheerleading threads. Yes, there is an off-topic section of the forum, but you are abusing it by aggressively spamming it with repetitive “advocacy” threads (as opposed to actual discussion) that nobody seems to be interested in.

…he couldn’t even make it a full day before posting another RP boosterism thread (thinly disguised as a procedural rathole about what delegates can do).

So, no more markmax, and hopefully no more need for markrnax and all his other derivatives…

[Anonymous]

[quote=markmax33]It is somebody with admin right on the website because the user name is set to the same amount of years and weeks that I’ve had a screen name. Who has admin rights other than Rich?[/quote]
What.. you have admin rights?.. Accusing Rich? Sounds like a bit of paranoia. Hey.. that would mean that I have admin rights…

[Anonymous]

[quote=Rich Toscano]So, no more markmax, and hopefully no more need for markrnax and all his other derivatives…[/quote] I just read this.. darn.. no more fun!! PS: I am not a markrnax derivative.. I am a copyrighted original! ☺

[briansd1]

Harvey is way too polite and gentle, too brainy and professorial.

I like pri much better.

[briansd1]

Like I said before, the experiment with libertarianism should be to privatize the post office and highway system. Also get rid of regulations of telecom companies.

We want those industries to have the freedom to operate only where economies of scale make it most profitable to operate.

[Arraya]

Well, we did have a libertarian “experiment”. It was from about 1820 to the Sherman Anti-trust act in 1890. It led to monopolies and the turn of the century labor movements.

Though, I would like to see it happen again. The social stress would be enormous.

Ironically, the first libertarian experiment needed to be launched with massive state intervention.

[briansd1]

I wonder how the guys who live out in the boonies would feel they can’t get cell phone coverage because the telcos make the business decision that it’s not worth servicing them?

After all, living in the middle of nowhere is a personal choice. Why should the subscribers in urban areas subsidize those low density folks.

[ucodegen]

[quote=briansd1]After all, living in the middle of nowhere is a personal choice. Why should the subscribers in urban areas subsidize those low density folks.[/quote]Because we are subsidizing the telcos through use of public land and right-of ways, including easements on private land for some underground cabling. Do you think they bought the land that all the cables for the telcos are in?

[all]

[quote=burghMan]It’s captcha. I don’t even know exactly how I figured this out, I just got curious and was clicking around and noticed this:

http://piggington.com/user/captcha

Sorry, did I spoil the fun?[/quote]

Buh humbug… one time people talk about me and it has to happen on weekend.
“I don’t work weekends” ∧ “I won’t spend time on piggington unless I’m getting paid for that time” => “I don’t check in on weekends”.

[Author]

Posts