Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › I think it’s pretty safe to say that Bear Streans is more or less finished.
- This topic has 175 replies, 26 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 1 month ago by LA_Renter.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 14, 2008 at 9:37 PM #170308March 14, 2008 at 9:54 PM #169885drunkleParticipant
chris:
your insecurity is strange. you don’t have to convince everyone that you’re right, you dont have to convince everyone that you’re a winner. you’re far from the mindless “buy the dips, dollar cost average” idiots, your trend analysis is worth noting and far more valuable. if it weren’t for bombs that are dropping behind the veil of lies and deceit, you’d probably have been spot on.
March 14, 2008 at 9:54 PM #170219drunkleParticipantchris:
your insecurity is strange. you don’t have to convince everyone that you’re right, you dont have to convince everyone that you’re a winner. you’re far from the mindless “buy the dips, dollar cost average” idiots, your trend analysis is worth noting and far more valuable. if it weren’t for bombs that are dropping behind the veil of lies and deceit, you’d probably have been spot on.
March 14, 2008 at 9:54 PM #170222drunkleParticipantchris:
your insecurity is strange. you don’t have to convince everyone that you’re right, you dont have to convince everyone that you’re a winner. you’re far from the mindless “buy the dips, dollar cost average” idiots, your trend analysis is worth noting and far more valuable. if it weren’t for bombs that are dropping behind the veil of lies and deceit, you’d probably have been spot on.
March 14, 2008 at 9:54 PM #170245drunkleParticipantchris:
your insecurity is strange. you don’t have to convince everyone that you’re right, you dont have to convince everyone that you’re a winner. you’re far from the mindless “buy the dips, dollar cost average” idiots, your trend analysis is worth noting and far more valuable. if it weren’t for bombs that are dropping behind the veil of lies and deceit, you’d probably have been spot on.
March 14, 2008 at 9:54 PM #170324drunkleParticipantchris:
your insecurity is strange. you don’t have to convince everyone that you’re right, you dont have to convince everyone that you’re a winner. you’re far from the mindless “buy the dips, dollar cost average” idiots, your trend analysis is worth noting and far more valuable. if it weren’t for bombs that are dropping behind the veil of lies and deceit, you’d probably have been spot on.
March 14, 2008 at 10:52 PM #169921EugeneParticipantIf you have brokerage account with them, it may be wise to transfer the stocks you have to another brokerage. In theory, the stocks you have just like your money in the bank but without FDIC insurance and you don’t know if BS still have them physically :). At least that’s my take and I can be wrong.
There’s a special kind of insurance called SIPC that gets involved whenever a brokerage fails, it will attempt to give you your stocks back, even if the brokerage did not have them in physical possession when it failed. It’s not as bulletproof as FDIC though.
March 14, 2008 at 10:52 PM #170254EugeneParticipantIf you have brokerage account with them, it may be wise to transfer the stocks you have to another brokerage. In theory, the stocks you have just like your money in the bank but without FDIC insurance and you don’t know if BS still have them physically :). At least that’s my take and I can be wrong.
There’s a special kind of insurance called SIPC that gets involved whenever a brokerage fails, it will attempt to give you your stocks back, even if the brokerage did not have them in physical possession when it failed. It’s not as bulletproof as FDIC though.
March 14, 2008 at 10:52 PM #170257EugeneParticipantIf you have brokerage account with them, it may be wise to transfer the stocks you have to another brokerage. In theory, the stocks you have just like your money in the bank but without FDIC insurance and you don’t know if BS still have them physically :). At least that’s my take and I can be wrong.
There’s a special kind of insurance called SIPC that gets involved whenever a brokerage fails, it will attempt to give you your stocks back, even if the brokerage did not have them in physical possession when it failed. It’s not as bulletproof as FDIC though.
March 14, 2008 at 10:52 PM #170281EugeneParticipantIf you have brokerage account with them, it may be wise to transfer the stocks you have to another brokerage. In theory, the stocks you have just like your money in the bank but without FDIC insurance and you don’t know if BS still have them physically :). At least that’s my take and I can be wrong.
There’s a special kind of insurance called SIPC that gets involved whenever a brokerage fails, it will attempt to give you your stocks back, even if the brokerage did not have them in physical possession when it failed. It’s not as bulletproof as FDIC though.
March 14, 2008 at 10:52 PM #170357EugeneParticipantIf you have brokerage account with them, it may be wise to transfer the stocks you have to another brokerage. In theory, the stocks you have just like your money in the bank but without FDIC insurance and you don’t know if BS still have them physically :). At least that’s my take and I can be wrong.
There’s a special kind of insurance called SIPC that gets involved whenever a brokerage fails, it will attempt to give you your stocks back, even if the brokerage did not have them in physical possession when it failed. It’s not as bulletproof as FDIC though.
March 15, 2008 at 2:06 AM #169976gdcoxParticipantWhich website is that SDR?
March 15, 2008 at 2:06 AM #170309gdcoxParticipantWhich website is that SDR?
March 15, 2008 at 2:06 AM #170310gdcoxParticipantWhich website is that SDR?
March 15, 2008 at 2:06 AM #170336gdcoxParticipantWhich website is that SDR?
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.