- This topic has 130 replies, 17 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 10 months ago by
TuVu.
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 19, 2008 at 11:39 AM #225597June 19, 2008 at 11:46 AM #225429
largemammal
ParticipantJust wait till we find out how many high-level FBI guys had Countrywide loans… 😛
June 19, 2008 at 11:46 AM #225539ParticipantJust wait till we find out how many high-level FBI guys had Countrywide loans… 😛
June 19, 2008 at 11:46 AM #225557ParticipantJust wait till we find out how many high-level FBI guys had Countrywide loans… 😛
June 19, 2008 at 11:46 AM #225586ParticipantJust wait till we find out how many high-level FBI guys had Countrywide loans… 😛
June 19, 2008 at 11:46 AM #225602ParticipantJust wait till we find out how many high-level FBI guys had Countrywide loans… 😛
June 19, 2008 at 12:32 PM #225459scaredyclassic
ParticipantSince the Supreme Court has been considering expanding the death penalty to non-homicide crimes, maybe some new laws providing for execution for financial crimes would motivate people toward fairer dealing at the expense of some potential profit. Obviously not just any old financial crime would qualify–only the most serious financial crimes … if that were the law, and the judge ina trial in which you were serving as a juror told you you had to follow the law, even if you disagreed with it, would you hesitate to impose the death penalty in a financial fraud housing case (assuming you’re open to the death penalty)… or would you just go for it…
June 19, 2008 at 12:32 PM #225569ParticipantSince the Supreme Court has been considering expanding the death penalty to non-homicide crimes, maybe some new laws providing for execution for financial crimes would motivate people toward fairer dealing at the expense of some potential profit. Obviously not just any old financial crime would qualify–only the most serious financial crimes … if that were the law, and the judge ina trial in which you were serving as a juror told you you had to follow the law, even if you disagreed with it, would you hesitate to impose the death penalty in a financial fraud housing case (assuming you’re open to the death penalty)… or would you just go for it…
June 19, 2008 at 12:32 PM #225587ParticipantSince the Supreme Court has been considering expanding the death penalty to non-homicide crimes, maybe some new laws providing for execution for financial crimes would motivate people toward fairer dealing at the expense of some potential profit. Obviously not just any old financial crime would qualify–only the most serious financial crimes … if that were the law, and the judge ina trial in which you were serving as a juror told you you had to follow the law, even if you disagreed with it, would you hesitate to impose the death penalty in a financial fraud housing case (assuming you’re open to the death penalty)… or would you just go for it…
June 19, 2008 at 12:32 PM #225617ParticipantSince the Supreme Court has been considering expanding the death penalty to non-homicide crimes, maybe some new laws providing for execution for financial crimes would motivate people toward fairer dealing at the expense of some potential profit. Obviously not just any old financial crime would qualify–only the most serious financial crimes … if that were the law, and the judge ina trial in which you were serving as a juror told you you had to follow the law, even if you disagreed with it, would you hesitate to impose the death penalty in a financial fraud housing case (assuming you’re open to the death penalty)… or would you just go for it…
June 19, 2008 at 12:32 PM #225631ParticipantSince the Supreme Court has been considering expanding the death penalty to non-homicide crimes, maybe some new laws providing for execution for financial crimes would motivate people toward fairer dealing at the expense of some potential profit. Obviously not just any old financial crime would qualify–only the most serious financial crimes … if that were the law, and the judge ina trial in which you were serving as a juror told you you had to follow the law, even if you disagreed with it, would you hesitate to impose the death penalty in a financial fraud housing case (assuming you’re open to the death penalty)… or would you just go for it…
June 19, 2008 at 12:38 PM #225469kev374
Participantbut…but… the fund had a good name..High Grade Structured Enhanced Leverage Fund??
[quote=PadreBrian]Keep them doggies rollin.[/quote]
LOL!!! I agree 100%, all these criminal dirtbags should be rounded up.
June 19, 2008 at 12:38 PM #225579Participantbut…but… the fund had a good name..High Grade Structured Enhanced Leverage Fund??
[quote=PadreBrian]Keep them doggies rollin.[/quote]
LOL!!! I agree 100%, all these criminal dirtbags should be rounded up.
June 19, 2008 at 12:38 PM #225596Participantbut…but… the fund had a good name..High Grade Structured Enhanced Leverage Fund??
[quote=PadreBrian]Keep them doggies rollin.[/quote]
LOL!!! I agree 100%, all these criminal dirtbags should be rounded up.
June 19, 2008 at 12:38 PM #225627Participantbut…but… the fund had a good name..High Grade Structured Enhanced Leverage Fund??
[quote=PadreBrian]Keep them doggies rollin.[/quote]
LOL!!! I agree 100%, all these criminal dirtbags should be rounded up.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.