Menu

Home › Forums › Closed Forums › Properties or Areas › Huge Flip in MM?

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 36 total)
1 2 3
  • Author
    Posts
  • January 26, 2011 at 8:39 PM #659609
    surveyor
    Participant

    If you look at the google street view, you can have an idea of its previous condition, although that may have been during construction, depending on the street view date.

    Looks like a decent amount of work put into the property.

    January 26, 2011 at 8:45 PM #658483
    SD Realtor
    Participant

    If you really want to check things out then you can check the permit status with the city to see if any new permits were pulled. If there was serious work done, then they probably pulled permits.

    The flippers did very well on this one.

    January 26, 2011 at 8:45 PM #658545
    SD Realtor
    Participant

    If you really want to check things out then you can check the permit status with the city to see if any new permits were pulled. If there was serious work done, then they probably pulled permits.

    The flippers did very well on this one.

    January 26, 2011 at 8:45 PM #659148
    SD Realtor
    Participant

    If you really want to check things out then you can check the permit status with the city to see if any new permits were pulled. If there was serious work done, then they probably pulled permits.

    The flippers did very well on this one.

    January 26, 2011 at 8:45 PM #659286
    SD Realtor
    Participant

    If you really want to check things out then you can check the permit status with the city to see if any new permits were pulled. If there was serious work done, then they probably pulled permits.

    The flippers did very well on this one.

    January 26, 2011 at 8:45 PM #659614
    SD Realtor
    Participant

    If you really want to check things out then you can check the permit status with the city to see if any new permits were pulled. If there was serious work done, then they probably pulled permits.

    The flippers did very well on this one.

    January 26, 2011 at 8:59 PM #658488
    EmilyHicks
    Participant

    The question is, why buy at $425k and then immediately sell it at a loss?

    January 26, 2011 at 8:59 PM #658550
    EmilyHicks
    Participant

    The question is, why buy at $425k and then immediately sell it at a loss?

    January 26, 2011 at 8:59 PM #659153
    EmilyHicks
    Participant

    The question is, why buy at $425k and then immediately sell it at a loss?

    January 26, 2011 at 8:59 PM #659291
    EmilyHicks
    Participant

    The question is, why buy at $425k and then immediately sell it at a loss?

    January 26, 2011 at 8:59 PM #659619
    EmilyHicks
    Participant

    The question is, why buy at $425k and then immediately sell it at a loss?

    January 27, 2011 at 8:53 AM #658658
    UCGal
    Participant

    [quote=EmilyHicks]The question is, why buy at $425k and then immediately sell it at a loss?[/quote]
    I’m not sure this happened.

    Redfin’s sales history shows a sale on 11/30 for $405k. Sdlookup shows it as $425k. It had been listed at $425k.
    http://www.redfin.com/CA/San-Diego/8990-Brentford-Ave-92126/home/4798406

    What’s interesting is I looked at the grant deed recordings and found the following.

    Kucan & Clark purchased the property on Sept 30th. The previous owners had had an NOD filed against them in May 2009, and NOT in June 2010. In other words they were headed towards foreclosure. It also appears they were going through divorce according to court records. That is probably the cause of some of their financial distress. (Divorce is expensive.)

    I do not show any grant deed transfers for the 11/30/2010 date from K&C. Since redfin shows the same $405 price, I don’t know what is going on with that sale. I did not go looking at Clark or Kukan’s grant recordings… just the partnership.

    I show a grant deed recorded on 1/6/2011 from K&C to (presumeably) the new owner.

    I would take that $425k price on 11/30 and disregard it. It appears to be an error. Maybe one of the realtors can weigh in and explain it.

    January 27, 2011 at 8:53 AM #658720
    UCGal
    Participant

    [quote=EmilyHicks]The question is, why buy at $425k and then immediately sell it at a loss?[/quote]
    I’m not sure this happened.

    Redfin’s sales history shows a sale on 11/30 for $405k. Sdlookup shows it as $425k. It had been listed at $425k.
    http://www.redfin.com/CA/San-Diego/8990-Brentford-Ave-92126/home/4798406

    What’s interesting is I looked at the grant deed recordings and found the following.

    Kucan & Clark purchased the property on Sept 30th. The previous owners had had an NOD filed against them in May 2009, and NOT in June 2010. In other words they were headed towards foreclosure. It also appears they were going through divorce according to court records. That is probably the cause of some of their financial distress. (Divorce is expensive.)

    I do not show any grant deed transfers for the 11/30/2010 date from K&C. Since redfin shows the same $405 price, I don’t know what is going on with that sale. I did not go looking at Clark or Kukan’s grant recordings… just the partnership.

    I show a grant deed recorded on 1/6/2011 from K&C to (presumeably) the new owner.

    I would take that $425k price on 11/30 and disregard it. It appears to be an error. Maybe one of the realtors can weigh in and explain it.

    January 27, 2011 at 8:53 AM #659323
    UCGal
    Participant

    [quote=EmilyHicks]The question is, why buy at $425k and then immediately sell it at a loss?[/quote]
    I’m not sure this happened.

    Redfin’s sales history shows a sale on 11/30 for $405k. Sdlookup shows it as $425k. It had been listed at $425k.
    http://www.redfin.com/CA/San-Diego/8990-Brentford-Ave-92126/home/4798406

    What’s interesting is I looked at the grant deed recordings and found the following.

    Kucan & Clark purchased the property on Sept 30th. The previous owners had had an NOD filed against them in May 2009, and NOT in June 2010. In other words they were headed towards foreclosure. It also appears they were going through divorce according to court records. That is probably the cause of some of their financial distress. (Divorce is expensive.)

    I do not show any grant deed transfers for the 11/30/2010 date from K&C. Since redfin shows the same $405 price, I don’t know what is going on with that sale. I did not go looking at Clark or Kukan’s grant recordings… just the partnership.

    I show a grant deed recorded on 1/6/2011 from K&C to (presumeably) the new owner.

    I would take that $425k price on 11/30 and disregard it. It appears to be an error. Maybe one of the realtors can weigh in and explain it.

    January 27, 2011 at 8:53 AM #659461
    UCGal
    Participant

    [quote=EmilyHicks]The question is, why buy at $425k and then immediately sell it at a loss?[/quote]
    I’m not sure this happened.

    Redfin’s sales history shows a sale on 11/30 for $405k. Sdlookup shows it as $425k. It had been listed at $425k.
    http://www.redfin.com/CA/San-Diego/8990-Brentford-Ave-92126/home/4798406

    What’s interesting is I looked at the grant deed recordings and found the following.

    Kucan & Clark purchased the property on Sept 30th. The previous owners had had an NOD filed against them in May 2009, and NOT in June 2010. In other words they were headed towards foreclosure. It also appears they were going through divorce according to court records. That is probably the cause of some of their financial distress. (Divorce is expensive.)

    I do not show any grant deed transfers for the 11/30/2010 date from K&C. Since redfin shows the same $405 price, I don’t know what is going on with that sale. I did not go looking at Clark or Kukan’s grant recordings… just the partnership.

    I show a grant deed recorded on 1/6/2011 from K&C to (presumeably) the new owner.

    I would take that $425k price on 11/30 and disregard it. It appears to be an error. Maybe one of the realtors can weigh in and explain it.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 36 total)
1 2 3
  • The forum ‘Properties or Areas’ is closed to new topics and replies.