- This topic has 835 replies, 21 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 8 months ago by sdrealtor.
-
AuthorPosts
-
September 9, 2010 at 2:47 PM #603950September 9, 2010 at 3:15 PM #602934njtosdParticipant
I guess what I’m trying to get at is statistical significance. If no person (realtor or not) can predict the sales price of a home (on average) with a greater than 96% accuracy, it’s meaningless (statistically) to say that someone paid a few percent too much or too little. For the same reason, it would be ridiculous to say that someone is probably wrong when they guess “heads” on the flip of a coin.
September 9, 2010 at 3:15 PM #603023njtosdParticipantI guess what I’m trying to get at is statistical significance. If no person (realtor or not) can predict the sales price of a home (on average) with a greater than 96% accuracy, it’s meaningless (statistically) to say that someone paid a few percent too much or too little. For the same reason, it would be ridiculous to say that someone is probably wrong when they guess “heads” on the flip of a coin.
September 9, 2010 at 3:15 PM #603571njtosdParticipantI guess what I’m trying to get at is statistical significance. If no person (realtor or not) can predict the sales price of a home (on average) with a greater than 96% accuracy, it’s meaningless (statistically) to say that someone paid a few percent too much or too little. For the same reason, it would be ridiculous to say that someone is probably wrong when they guess “heads” on the flip of a coin.
September 9, 2010 at 3:15 PM #603678njtosdParticipantI guess what I’m trying to get at is statistical significance. If no person (realtor or not) can predict the sales price of a home (on average) with a greater than 96% accuracy, it’s meaningless (statistically) to say that someone paid a few percent too much or too little. For the same reason, it would be ridiculous to say that someone is probably wrong when they guess “heads” on the flip of a coin.
September 9, 2010 at 3:15 PM #603995njtosdParticipantI guess what I’m trying to get at is statistical significance. If no person (realtor or not) can predict the sales price of a home (on average) with a greater than 96% accuracy, it’s meaningless (statistically) to say that someone paid a few percent too much or too little. For the same reason, it would be ridiculous to say that someone is probably wrong when they guess “heads” on the flip of a coin.
September 9, 2010 at 3:28 PM #602959sdrealtorParticipantDoesnt work that way. Someone can predict with very high accuracy but the unexpected can occasionally happen. Even though you cant predict something perfectly you can make an assessment on the outcome post mortum.
September 9, 2010 at 3:28 PM #603048sdrealtorParticipantDoesnt work that way. Someone can predict with very high accuracy but the unexpected can occasionally happen. Even though you cant predict something perfectly you can make an assessment on the outcome post mortum.
September 9, 2010 at 3:28 PM #603596sdrealtorParticipantDoesnt work that way. Someone can predict with very high accuracy but the unexpected can occasionally happen. Even though you cant predict something perfectly you can make an assessment on the outcome post mortum.
September 9, 2010 at 3:28 PM #603703sdrealtorParticipantDoesnt work that way. Someone can predict with very high accuracy but the unexpected can occasionally happen. Even though you cant predict something perfectly you can make an assessment on the outcome post mortum.
September 9, 2010 at 3:28 PM #604020sdrealtorParticipantDoesnt work that way. Someone can predict with very high accuracy but the unexpected can occasionally happen. Even though you cant predict something perfectly you can make an assessment on the outcome post mortum.
September 9, 2010 at 3:36 PM #602969njtosdParticipant[quote=sdrealtor] . . . Even though you cant predict something perfectly you can make an assessment on the outcome post mortum.[/quote]
But that’s why they came up with the phrases Monday morning quarterback, 2-/20 hindsight, etc. You can make an assessment, but you have to keep in mind the concept of statistical significance. Everyone is entitled to their own (subjective) opinion. But to say that someone else got it wrong (objectively) you need to know how accurately the best estimator can predict.
September 9, 2010 at 3:36 PM #603058njtosdParticipant[quote=sdrealtor] . . . Even though you cant predict something perfectly you can make an assessment on the outcome post mortum.[/quote]
But that’s why they came up with the phrases Monday morning quarterback, 2-/20 hindsight, etc. You can make an assessment, but you have to keep in mind the concept of statistical significance. Everyone is entitled to their own (subjective) opinion. But to say that someone else got it wrong (objectively) you need to know how accurately the best estimator can predict.
September 9, 2010 at 3:36 PM #603606njtosdParticipant[quote=sdrealtor] . . . Even though you cant predict something perfectly you can make an assessment on the outcome post mortum.[/quote]
But that’s why they came up with the phrases Monday morning quarterback, 2-/20 hindsight, etc. You can make an assessment, but you have to keep in mind the concept of statistical significance. Everyone is entitled to their own (subjective) opinion. But to say that someone else got it wrong (objectively) you need to know how accurately the best estimator can predict.
September 9, 2010 at 3:36 PM #603713njtosdParticipant[quote=sdrealtor] . . . Even though you cant predict something perfectly you can make an assessment on the outcome post mortum.[/quote]
But that’s why they came up with the phrases Monday morning quarterback, 2-/20 hindsight, etc. You can make an assessment, but you have to keep in mind the concept of statistical significance. Everyone is entitled to their own (subjective) opinion. But to say that someone else got it wrong (objectively) you need to know how accurately the best estimator can predict.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.