How The British Do It

[urbanrealtor]

Since the country has no written constitution, its not clear (at least to me) that the HOL has more power than prince Harry.

Dude I cannot believe you reference Streisand, ELO, and Sammy Hagar together.

Now that gets me aroused.

Hopefully that sounds as creepy to you as it does to me.

[Allan from Fallbrook]

Dan: You’re a freak! But, I love you for it! Too bad you’re Irish or there might’ve been some hope.

Aroused. Nice. Well, at least you didn’t say turgid.

[Allan from Fallbrook]

Dan: You’re a freak! But, I love you for it! Too bad you’re Irish or there might’ve been some hope.

Aroused. Nice. Well, at least you didn’t say turgid.

[Allan from Fallbrook]

Dan: You’re a freak! But, I love you for it! Too bad you’re Irish or there might’ve been some hope.

Aroused. Nice. Well, at least you didn’t say turgid.

[Allan from Fallbrook]

Dan: You’re a freak! But, I love you for it! Too bad you’re Irish or there might’ve been some hope.

Aroused. Nice. Well, at least you didn’t say turgid.

[Allan from Fallbrook]

Dan: You’re a freak! But, I love you for it! Too bad you’re Irish or there might’ve been some hope.

Aroused. Nice. Well, at least you didn’t say turgid.

[34f3f3f]

The House of Lords is severely restricted in it’s ability to veto bills from the Commons, which is probably due to the strong conservative and therefore non-representative element residing within it. However, it now comprises mostly appointed members who are life peers, such as Lady Margaret Thatcher, as opposed to hereditary, which include some of the old British Aristocracy names with fancy titles like Viscount. The difference is that a life peer loses their title when they die, and is not inherited by offspring. But the Lords are not completely powerless as they can and do introduce bills, though not as many as the Commons. I guess their primary role is as a debating forum, and checks and balances for legislation.

[34f3f3f]

The House of Lords is severely restricted in it’s ability to veto bills from the Commons, which is probably due to the strong conservative and therefore non-representative element residing within it. However, it now comprises mostly appointed members who are life peers, such as Lady Margaret Thatcher, as opposed to hereditary, which include some of the old British Aristocracy names with fancy titles like Viscount. The difference is that a life peer loses their title when they die, and is not inherited by offspring. But the Lords are not completely powerless as they can and do introduce bills, though not as many as the Commons. I guess their primary role is as a debating forum, and checks and balances for legislation.

[34f3f3f]

The House of Lords is severely restricted in it’s ability to veto bills from the Commons, which is probably due to the strong conservative and therefore non-representative element residing within it. However, it now comprises mostly appointed members who are life peers, such as Lady Margaret Thatcher, as opposed to hereditary, which include some of the old British Aristocracy names with fancy titles like Viscount. The difference is that a life peer loses their title when they die, and is not inherited by offspring. But the Lords are not completely powerless as they can and do introduce bills, though not as many as the Commons. I guess their primary role is as a debating forum, and checks and balances for legislation.

[34f3f3f]

The House of Lords is severely restricted in it’s ability to veto bills from the Commons, which is probably due to the strong conservative and therefore non-representative element residing within it. However, it now comprises mostly appointed members who are life peers, such as Lady Margaret Thatcher, as opposed to hereditary, which include some of the old British Aristocracy names with fancy titles like Viscount. The difference is that a life peer loses their title when they die, and is not inherited by offspring. But the Lords are not completely powerless as they can and do introduce bills, though not as many as the Commons. I guess their primary role is as a debating forum, and checks and balances for legislation.

[34f3f3f]

The House of Lords is severely restricted in it’s ability to veto bills from the Commons, which is probably due to the strong conservative and therefore non-representative element residing within it. However, it now comprises mostly appointed members who are life peers, such as Lady Margaret Thatcher, as opposed to hereditary, which include some of the old British Aristocracy names with fancy titles like Viscount. The difference is that a life peer loses their title when they die, and is not inherited by offspring. But the Lords are not completely powerless as they can and do introduce bills, though not as many as the Commons. I guess their primary role is as a debating forum, and checks and balances for legislation.

[urbanrealtor]

[quote=qwerty007]The House of Lords is severely restricted in it’s ability to veto bills from the Commons, which is probably due to the strong conservative and therefore non-representative element residing within it. However, it now comprises mostly appointed members who are life peers, such as Lady Margaret Thatcher, as opposed to hereditary, which include some of the old British Aristocracy names with fancy titles like Viscount. The difference is that a life peer loses their title when they die, and is not inherited by offspring. But the Lords are not completely powerless as they can and do introduce bills, though not as many as the Commons. I guess their primary role is as a debating forum, and checks and balances for legislation.[/quote]
I would totally be a kick ass member of the HOL.

First step: Arm the strong members and cull the rest.

Any suggestions for a next step?

[urbanrealtor]

[quote=qwerty007]The House of Lords is severely restricted in it’s ability to veto bills from the Commons, which is probably due to the strong conservative and therefore non-representative element residing within it. However, it now comprises mostly appointed members who are life peers, such as Lady Margaret Thatcher, as opposed to hereditary, which include some of the old British Aristocracy names with fancy titles like Viscount. The difference is that a life peer loses their title when they die, and is not inherited by offspring. But the Lords are not completely powerless as they can and do introduce bills, though not as many as the Commons. I guess their primary role is as a debating forum, and checks and balances for legislation.[/quote]
I would totally be a kick ass member of the HOL.

First step: Arm the strong members and cull the rest.

Any suggestions for a next step?

[urbanrealtor]

[quote=qwerty007]The House of Lords is severely restricted in it’s ability to veto bills from the Commons, which is probably due to the strong conservative and therefore non-representative element residing within it. However, it now comprises mostly appointed members who are life peers, such as Lady Margaret Thatcher, as opposed to hereditary, which include some of the old British Aristocracy names with fancy titles like Viscount. The difference is that a life peer loses their title when they die, and is not inherited by offspring. But the Lords are not completely powerless as they can and do introduce bills, though not as many as the Commons. I guess their primary role is as a debating forum, and checks and balances for legislation.[/quote]
I would totally be a kick ass member of the HOL.

First step: Arm the strong members and cull the rest.

Any suggestions for a next step?

[urbanrealtor]

[quote=qwerty007]The House of Lords is severely restricted in it’s ability to veto bills from the Commons, which is probably due to the strong conservative and therefore non-representative element residing within it. However, it now comprises mostly appointed members who are life peers, such as Lady Margaret Thatcher, as opposed to hereditary, which include some of the old British Aristocracy names with fancy titles like Viscount. The difference is that a life peer loses their title when they die, and is not inherited by offspring. But the Lords are not completely powerless as they can and do introduce bills, though not as many as the Commons. I guess their primary role is as a debating forum, and checks and balances for legislation.[/quote]
I would totally be a kick ass member of the HOL.

First step: Arm the strong members and cull the rest.

Any suggestions for a next step?

[Author]

Posts