- This topic has 275 replies, 25 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 1 month ago by Raybyrnes.
-
AuthorPosts
-
April 8, 2008 at 10:36 AM #182861April 8, 2008 at 10:39 AM #182812sdrealtorParticipant
SD R,
You, I and Rus understand the game and how its plays out. We see it every day. I personally have seen a few homes sell close to 20% below what I thought the market was for them. Opportunistic buyers will find great deals well before the bottom. There arent many but they do exist.sdr
April 8, 2008 at 10:39 AM #182825sdrealtorParticipantSD R,
You, I and Rus understand the game and how its plays out. We see it every day. I personally have seen a few homes sell close to 20% below what I thought the market was for them. Opportunistic buyers will find great deals well before the bottom. There arent many but they do exist.sdr
April 8, 2008 at 10:39 AM #182853sdrealtorParticipantSD R,
You, I and Rus understand the game and how its plays out. We see it every day. I personally have seen a few homes sell close to 20% below what I thought the market was for them. Opportunistic buyers will find great deals well before the bottom. There arent many but they do exist.sdr
April 8, 2008 at 10:39 AM #182859sdrealtorParticipantSD R,
You, I and Rus understand the game and how its plays out. We see it every day. I personally have seen a few homes sell close to 20% below what I thought the market was for them. Opportunistic buyers will find great deals well before the bottom. There arent many but they do exist.sdr
April 8, 2008 at 10:39 AM #182866sdrealtorParticipantSD R,
You, I and Rus understand the game and how its plays out. We see it every day. I personally have seen a few homes sell close to 20% below what I thought the market was for them. Opportunistic buyers will find great deals well before the bottom. There arent many but they do exist.sdr
April 8, 2008 at 10:45 AM #182817NotCrankyParticipantThanks contraman, That was all I am saying. I was assuming full doc. is not tough for most piggs. I understand on over inflated assets qualifing in this envornment is tough and probably not a good idea for most with regards to expensive depreciating houses. Sorry if I offended anyone.
Have a great day.April 8, 2008 at 10:45 AM #182830NotCrankyParticipantThanks contraman, That was all I am saying. I was assuming full doc. is not tough for most piggs. I understand on over inflated assets qualifing in this envornment is tough and probably not a good idea for most with regards to expensive depreciating houses. Sorry if I offended anyone.
Have a great day.April 8, 2008 at 10:45 AM #182858NotCrankyParticipantThanks contraman, That was all I am saying. I was assuming full doc. is not tough for most piggs. I understand on over inflated assets qualifing in this envornment is tough and probably not a good idea for most with regards to expensive depreciating houses. Sorry if I offended anyone.
Have a great day.April 8, 2008 at 10:45 AM #182864NotCrankyParticipantThanks contraman, That was all I am saying. I was assuming full doc. is not tough for most piggs. I understand on over inflated assets qualifing in this envornment is tough and probably not a good idea for most with regards to expensive depreciating houses. Sorry if I offended anyone.
Have a great day.April 8, 2008 at 10:45 AM #182871NotCrankyParticipantThanks contraman, That was all I am saying. I was assuming full doc. is not tough for most piggs. I understand on over inflated assets qualifing in this envornment is tough and probably not a good idea for most with regards to expensive depreciating houses. Sorry if I offended anyone.
Have a great day.April 8, 2008 at 11:20 AM #182882(former)FormerSanDieganParticipantSo let me get this straight, you are now advocating the use of high ltv loans as affordibility products again???? Is that not what got the market into the mess it is right now?
Actually, these products were available in the mid-90’s bottom as well. It was not unusual for first-time buyers to purchase with 5% down. It simply required full documentation, conservative debt ratios and payment of PMI. That’s what I did.
It was not high LTV products that caused the problem. It was the complete disregard to assessing risk and requiring documentation of income and assets.
I believe that for many first-time buyers, that sometime in the next 2, 3 or 4 years it will make perfect sense again for them to purchase with 5% down, assuming conservative DTI ratios and real jobs.
April 8, 2008 at 11:20 AM #182895(former)FormerSanDieganParticipantSo let me get this straight, you are now advocating the use of high ltv loans as affordibility products again???? Is that not what got the market into the mess it is right now?
Actually, these products were available in the mid-90’s bottom as well. It was not unusual for first-time buyers to purchase with 5% down. It simply required full documentation, conservative debt ratios and payment of PMI. That’s what I did.
It was not high LTV products that caused the problem. It was the complete disregard to assessing risk and requiring documentation of income and assets.
I believe that for many first-time buyers, that sometime in the next 2, 3 or 4 years it will make perfect sense again for them to purchase with 5% down, assuming conservative DTI ratios and real jobs.
April 8, 2008 at 11:20 AM #182922(former)FormerSanDieganParticipantSo let me get this straight, you are now advocating the use of high ltv loans as affordibility products again???? Is that not what got the market into the mess it is right now?
Actually, these products were available in the mid-90’s bottom as well. It was not unusual for first-time buyers to purchase with 5% down. It simply required full documentation, conservative debt ratios and payment of PMI. That’s what I did.
It was not high LTV products that caused the problem. It was the complete disregard to assessing risk and requiring documentation of income and assets.
I believe that for many first-time buyers, that sometime in the next 2, 3 or 4 years it will make perfect sense again for them to purchase with 5% down, assuming conservative DTI ratios and real jobs.
April 8, 2008 at 11:20 AM #182929(former)FormerSanDieganParticipantSo let me get this straight, you are now advocating the use of high ltv loans as affordibility products again???? Is that not what got the market into the mess it is right now?
Actually, these products were available in the mid-90’s bottom as well. It was not unusual for first-time buyers to purchase with 5% down. It simply required full documentation, conservative debt ratios and payment of PMI. That’s what I did.
It was not high LTV products that caused the problem. It was the complete disregard to assessing risk and requiring documentation of income and assets.
I believe that for many first-time buyers, that sometime in the next 2, 3 or 4 years it will make perfect sense again for them to purchase with 5% down, assuming conservative DTI ratios and real jobs.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.