- This topic has 80 replies, 11 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 8 months ago by
Bane.
-
AuthorPosts
-
December 26, 2009 at 9:34 AM #16844December 26, 2009 at 10:13 AM #497237
Mark Holmes
ParticipantWell, I think their point is that much of the new spending enacted in the last ten years simply adds to deficit spending with no plans for how to actually pay for it.
So we’re paying for it, not our children and grandchildren. It may not make us happy (I’m no fan of the current health care bill) but at least we’re not asking for ensuing generations to foot the bill.December 26, 2009 at 10:13 AM #497386Mark Holmes
ParticipantWell, I think their point is that much of the new spending enacted in the last ten years simply adds to deficit spending with no plans for how to actually pay for it.
So we’re paying for it, not our children and grandchildren. It may not make us happy (I’m no fan of the current health care bill) but at least we’re not asking for ensuing generations to foot the bill.December 26, 2009 at 10:13 AM #497777Mark Holmes
ParticipantWell, I think their point is that much of the new spending enacted in the last ten years simply adds to deficit spending with no plans for how to actually pay for it.
So we’re paying for it, not our children and grandchildren. It may not make us happy (I’m no fan of the current health care bill) but at least we’re not asking for ensuing generations to foot the bill.December 26, 2009 at 10:13 AM #497869Mark Holmes
ParticipantWell, I think their point is that much of the new spending enacted in the last ten years simply adds to deficit spending with no plans for how to actually pay for it.
So we’re paying for it, not our children and grandchildren. It may not make us happy (I’m no fan of the current health care bill) but at least we’re not asking for ensuing generations to foot the bill.December 26, 2009 at 10:13 AM #498117Mark Holmes
ParticipantWell, I think their point is that much of the new spending enacted in the last ten years simply adds to deficit spending with no plans for how to actually pay for it.
So we’re paying for it, not our children and grandchildren. It may not make us happy (I’m no fan of the current health care bill) but at least we’re not asking for ensuing generations to foot the bill.December 26, 2009 at 11:37 AM #497242waiting for bottom
ParticipantThis, of course, assumes the increased taxes will result in increased tax revenues and that the cuts in medicare actually go as planned and are not offset by any other increases.
December 26, 2009 at 11:37 AM #497391waiting for bottom
ParticipantThis, of course, assumes the increased taxes will result in increased tax revenues and that the cuts in medicare actually go as planned and are not offset by any other increases.
December 26, 2009 at 11:37 AM #497782waiting for bottom
ParticipantThis, of course, assumes the increased taxes will result in increased tax revenues and that the cuts in medicare actually go as planned and are not offset by any other increases.
December 26, 2009 at 11:37 AM #497875waiting for bottom
ParticipantThis, of course, assumes the increased taxes will result in increased tax revenues and that the cuts in medicare actually go as planned and are not offset by any other increases.
December 26, 2009 at 11:37 AM #498122waiting for bottom
ParticipantThis, of course, assumes the increased taxes will result in increased tax revenues and that the cuts in medicare actually go as planned and are not offset by any other increases.
December 26, 2009 at 12:24 PM #497246SK in CV
Participant[quote=Mark Holmes]Well, I think their point is that much of the new spending enacted in the last ten years simply adds to deficit spending with no plans for how to actually pay for it.
So we’re paying for it, not our children and grandchildren. It may not make us happy (I’m no fan of the current health care bill) but at least we’re not asking for ensuing generations to foot the bill.[/quote]Nailed it.
Six years ago..
[quote]it was standard practice not to pay for things.[/quote]So says Republican Senator Orrin Hatch.
http://abcnews.go.com/Business/wireStory?id=9423266
Tis better to brag about spending money with no apparent means to pay for it, or spending money and creating means to pay for it?
Which one of those helped to create the financial crisis?
December 26, 2009 at 12:24 PM #497396SK in CV
Participant[quote=Mark Holmes]Well, I think their point is that much of the new spending enacted in the last ten years simply adds to deficit spending with no plans for how to actually pay for it.
So we’re paying for it, not our children and grandchildren. It may not make us happy (I’m no fan of the current health care bill) but at least we’re not asking for ensuing generations to foot the bill.[/quote]Nailed it.
Six years ago..
[quote]it was standard practice not to pay for things.[/quote]So says Republican Senator Orrin Hatch.
http://abcnews.go.com/Business/wireStory?id=9423266
Tis better to brag about spending money with no apparent means to pay for it, or spending money and creating means to pay for it?
Which one of those helped to create the financial crisis?
December 26, 2009 at 12:24 PM #497787SK in CV
Participant[quote=Mark Holmes]Well, I think their point is that much of the new spending enacted in the last ten years simply adds to deficit spending with no plans for how to actually pay for it.
So we’re paying for it, not our children and grandchildren. It may not make us happy (I’m no fan of the current health care bill) but at least we’re not asking for ensuing generations to foot the bill.[/quote]Nailed it.
Six years ago..
[quote]it was standard practice not to pay for things.[/quote]So says Republican Senator Orrin Hatch.
http://abcnews.go.com/Business/wireStory?id=9423266
Tis better to brag about spending money with no apparent means to pay for it, or spending money and creating means to pay for it?
Which one of those helped to create the financial crisis?
December 26, 2009 at 12:24 PM #497880SK in CV
Participant[quote=Mark Holmes]Well, I think their point is that much of the new spending enacted in the last ten years simply adds to deficit spending with no plans for how to actually pay for it.
So we’re paying for it, not our children and grandchildren. It may not make us happy (I’m no fan of the current health care bill) but at least we’re not asking for ensuing generations to foot the bill.[/quote]Nailed it.
Six years ago..
[quote]it was standard practice not to pay for things.[/quote]So says Republican Senator Orrin Hatch.
http://abcnews.go.com/Business/wireStory?id=9423266
Tis better to brag about spending money with no apparent means to pay for it, or spending money and creating means to pay for it?
Which one of those helped to create the financial crisis?
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.