Menu

Home › Forums › Housing › Housing Prices Near Bottom according to MotleyFool

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 81 total)
1 2 3 4 5 6
  • Author
    Posts
  • February 25, 2008 at 6:45 PM #160235
    jpinpb
    Participant

    “The only reason it was higher was because people were willing to pay more.”

    All back to teaser rates, allowing for low monthly payments for a year or two, just in time for you to flip and make $$$ be retired – or retarded if the plan doesn’t work.

    February 25, 2008 at 10:35 PM #159967
    Anonymous
    Guest

    I think Motley Fool is one of least useful analysis sites out there. They were eternally bullish and always justifying tech stock prices back in 1999 by using “it’s different now” analysis, and it seems they are still that way – now with houses.

    February 25, 2008 at 10:35 PM #160263
    Anonymous
    Guest

    I think Motley Fool is one of least useful analysis sites out there. They were eternally bullish and always justifying tech stock prices back in 1999 by using “it’s different now” analysis, and it seems they are still that way – now with houses.

    February 25, 2008 at 10:35 PM #160278
    Anonymous
    Guest

    I think Motley Fool is one of least useful analysis sites out there. They were eternally bullish and always justifying tech stock prices back in 1999 by using “it’s different now” analysis, and it seems they are still that way – now with houses.

    February 25, 2008 at 10:35 PM #160282
    Anonymous
    Guest

    I think Motley Fool is one of least useful analysis sites out there. They were eternally bullish and always justifying tech stock prices back in 1999 by using “it’s different now” analysis, and it seems they are still that way – now with houses.

    February 25, 2008 at 10:35 PM #160360
    Anonymous
    Guest

    I think Motley Fool is one of least useful analysis sites out there. They were eternally bullish and always justifying tech stock prices back in 1999 by using “it’s different now” analysis, and it seems they are still that way – now with houses.

    February 25, 2008 at 10:40 PM #159972
    Deal Hunter
    Participant

    I like that…

    “teaser rates…[lead to being] retired or retarded!” LOL!

    February 25, 2008 at 10:40 PM #160268
    Deal Hunter
    Participant

    I like that…

    “teaser rates…[lead to being] retired or retarded!” LOL!

    February 25, 2008 at 10:40 PM #160284
    Deal Hunter
    Participant

    I like that…

    “teaser rates…[lead to being] retired or retarded!” LOL!

    February 25, 2008 at 10:40 PM #160287
    Deal Hunter
    Participant

    I like that…

    “teaser rates…[lead to being] retired or retarded!” LOL!

    February 25, 2008 at 10:40 PM #160365
    Deal Hunter
    Participant

    I like that…

    “teaser rates…[lead to being] retired or retarded!” LOL!

    February 26, 2008 at 10:44 AM #160176
    cr
    Participant

    I normally find Motley Fool reliable but in this instance I am reminded of David Lereah and Jim Cramer 2 years ago: ignorant, lying, and spreading propaganda.

    I’d be less surprised if the fool was put up to this article by the NAR than if even one of their arguments held water.

    It’s not ever worth refuting because the primary key to housing affordabililty is not once mentioned in that entire article.

    February 26, 2008 at 10:44 AM #160474
    cr
    Participant

    I normally find Motley Fool reliable but in this instance I am reminded of David Lereah and Jim Cramer 2 years ago: ignorant, lying, and spreading propaganda.

    I’d be less surprised if the fool was put up to this article by the NAR than if even one of their arguments held water.

    It’s not ever worth refuting because the primary key to housing affordabililty is not once mentioned in that entire article.

    February 26, 2008 at 10:44 AM #160488
    cr
    Participant

    I normally find Motley Fool reliable but in this instance I am reminded of David Lereah and Jim Cramer 2 years ago: ignorant, lying, and spreading propaganda.

    I’d be less surprised if the fool was put up to this article by the NAR than if even one of their arguments held water.

    It’s not ever worth refuting because the primary key to housing affordabililty is not once mentioned in that entire article.

    February 26, 2008 at 10:44 AM #160490
    cr
    Participant

    I normally find Motley Fool reliable but in this instance I am reminded of David Lereah and Jim Cramer 2 years ago: ignorant, lying, and spreading propaganda.

    I’d be less surprised if the fool was put up to this article by the NAR than if even one of their arguments held water.

    It’s not ever worth refuting because the primary key to housing affordabililty is not once mentioned in that entire article.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 81 total)
1 2 3 4 5 6
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.