- This topic has 50 replies, 9 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 1 month ago by robson.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 15, 2008 at 10:40 AM #170538March 15, 2008 at 11:08 AM #170111robsonParticipant
Agreed that the CS is better to follow, I keep an eye on Dataquick median simply because that’s what the public sees in the paper.
As far as the CS fall, it depends how you choose to convert the index # to $. I do it by setting the January 1988 ratio as “normal” but this is subjective. According to that technique, we had last $100,000 as of December. I’m sure the Feb CS #’s will show a bit larger, more accurate fall.March 15, 2008 at 11:08 AM #170441robsonParticipantAgreed that the CS is better to follow, I keep an eye on Dataquick median simply because that’s what the public sees in the paper.
As far as the CS fall, it depends how you choose to convert the index # to $. I do it by setting the January 1988 ratio as “normal” but this is subjective. According to that technique, we had last $100,000 as of December. I’m sure the Feb CS #’s will show a bit larger, more accurate fall.March 15, 2008 at 11:08 AM #170449robsonParticipantAgreed that the CS is better to follow, I keep an eye on Dataquick median simply because that’s what the public sees in the paper.
As far as the CS fall, it depends how you choose to convert the index # to $. I do it by setting the January 1988 ratio as “normal” but this is subjective. According to that technique, we had last $100,000 as of December. I’m sure the Feb CS #’s will show a bit larger, more accurate fall.March 15, 2008 at 11:08 AM #170471robsonParticipantAgreed that the CS is better to follow, I keep an eye on Dataquick median simply because that’s what the public sees in the paper.
As far as the CS fall, it depends how you choose to convert the index # to $. I do it by setting the January 1988 ratio as “normal” but this is subjective. According to that technique, we had last $100,000 as of December. I’m sure the Feb CS #’s will show a bit larger, more accurate fall.March 15, 2008 at 11:08 AM #170548robsonParticipantAgreed that the CS is better to follow, I keep an eye on Dataquick median simply because that’s what the public sees in the paper.
As far as the CS fall, it depends how you choose to convert the index # to $. I do it by setting the January 1988 ratio as “normal” but this is subjective. According to that technique, we had last $100,000 as of December. I’m sure the Feb CS #’s will show a bit larger, more accurate fall. -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.