Hey, it’s different out here: RE always goes up! :)

[barnaby33]

Brutus, did you even read the article? Your post seems completely tangential. Not that its bad advice, but what does it have to do with the article?

Josh

[Doofrat]

I love how they want to take Detroit’s (and other area’s like it) data out of the national average because it’s “local”.

This “article” has everything in it:

Finger pointing at the media

General statements about people still buying and selling and how “business, outside the financial, real estate, and construction sectors, is booming”
– Yeah forget those inconsequential little finance, real estate, and construction sectors.

A straight line calculation of past gains projected twenty years into the future.

Then they flat out say that you should “invest” in Real Estate instead of the stock market.

Yep, this article’s a keeper.

[Doofrat]

I love how they want to take Detroit’s (and other area’s like it) data out of the national average because it’s “local”.

This “article” has everything in it:

Finger pointing at the media

General statements about people still buying and selling and how “business, outside the financial, real estate, and construction sectors, is booming”
– Yeah forget those inconsequential little finance, real estate, and construction sectors.

A straight line calculation of past gains projected twenty years into the future.

Then they flat out say that you should “invest” in Real Estate instead of the stock market.

Yep, this article’s a keeper.

[Doofrat]

I love how they want to take Detroit’s (and other area’s like it) data out of the national average because it’s “local”.

This “article” has everything in it:

Finger pointing at the media

General statements about people still buying and selling and how “business, outside the financial, real estate, and construction sectors, is booming”
– Yeah forget those inconsequential little finance, real estate, and construction sectors.

A straight line calculation of past gains projected twenty years into the future.

Then they flat out say that you should “invest” in Real Estate instead of the stock market.

Yep, this article’s a keeper.

[Doofrat]

I love how they want to take Detroit’s (and other area’s like it) data out of the national average because it’s “local”.

This “article” has everything in it:

Finger pointing at the media

General statements about people still buying and selling and how “business, outside the financial, real estate, and construction sectors, is booming”
– Yeah forget those inconsequential little finance, real estate, and construction sectors.

A straight line calculation of past gains projected twenty years into the future.

Then they flat out say that you should “invest” in Real Estate instead of the stock market.

Yep, this article’s a keeper.

[Doofrat]

I love how they want to take Detroit’s (and other area’s like it) data out of the national average because it’s “local”.

This “article” has everything in it:

Finger pointing at the media

General statements about people still buying and selling and how “business, outside the financial, real estate, and construction sectors, is booming”
– Yeah forget those inconsequential little finance, real estate, and construction sectors.

A straight line calculation of past gains projected twenty years into the future.

Then they flat out say that you should “invest” in Real Estate instead of the stock market.

Yep, this article’s a keeper.

[DWCAP]

Do people actually believe this garbage? I mean really? Do they say, well, Detroit with its 918’000 people shouldnt be counted, but La Jolla, with its 42’000 people should??? (The community planning area of La Jolla does not include all of the 92037 area. For planning purposes the community consists of approximately 5,718 acres with population of 29,069.)
I am not sure if the REBA (La Jolla Real Estate Brokers’ Association) is counting the whole zip, or just the planning area, but really? We should ignore the 20-1 population difference and only choose the areas we like when computing national stats?

[DWCAP]

Do people actually believe this garbage? I mean really? Do they say, well, Detroit with its 918’000 people shouldnt be counted, but La Jolla, with its 42’000 people should??? (The community planning area of La Jolla does not include all of the 92037 area. For planning purposes the community consists of approximately 5,718 acres with population of 29,069.)
I am not sure if the REBA (La Jolla Real Estate Brokers’ Association) is counting the whole zip, or just the planning area, but really? We should ignore the 20-1 population difference and only choose the areas we like when computing national stats?

[DWCAP]

Do people actually believe this garbage? I mean really? Do they say, well, Detroit with its 918’000 people shouldnt be counted, but La Jolla, with its 42’000 people should??? (The community planning area of La Jolla does not include all of the 92037 area. For planning purposes the community consists of approximately 5,718 acres with population of 29,069.)
I am not sure if the REBA (La Jolla Real Estate Brokers’ Association) is counting the whole zip, or just the planning area, but really? We should ignore the 20-1 population difference and only choose the areas we like when computing national stats?

[DWCAP]

Do people actually believe this garbage? I mean really? Do they say, well, Detroit with its 918’000 people shouldnt be counted, but La Jolla, with its 42’000 people should??? (The community planning area of La Jolla does not include all of the 92037 area. For planning purposes the community consists of approximately 5,718 acres with population of 29,069.)
I am not sure if the REBA (La Jolla Real Estate Brokers’ Association) is counting the whole zip, or just the planning area, but really? We should ignore the 20-1 population difference and only choose the areas we like when computing national stats?

[DWCAP]

Do people actually believe this garbage? I mean really? Do they say, well, Detroit with its 918’000 people shouldnt be counted, but La Jolla, with its 42’000 people should??? (The community planning area of La Jolla does not include all of the 92037 area. For planning purposes the community consists of approximately 5,718 acres with population of 29,069.)
I am not sure if the REBA (La Jolla Real Estate Brokers’ Association) is counting the whole zip, or just the planning area, but really? We should ignore the 20-1 population difference and only choose the areas we like when computing national stats?

[sd_matt]

I like how they quote prices starting in ’77, stop at ’07 and leave out ’08 prices.

I wonder what they will be saying in ’09. Will they try some home-grown spin or will they be borrowing from David Lareah’s quote book?

[sd_matt]

I like how they quote prices starting in ’77, stop at ’07 and leave out ’08 prices.

I wonder what they will be saying in ’09. Will they try some home-grown spin or will they be borrowing from David Lareah’s quote book?

[sd_matt]

I like how they quote prices starting in ’77, stop at ’07 and leave out ’08 prices.

I wonder what they will be saying in ’09. Will they try some home-grown spin or will they be borrowing from David Lareah’s quote book?

[sd_matt]

I like how they quote prices starting in ’77, stop at ’07 and leave out ’08 prices.

I wonder what they will be saying in ’09. Will they try some home-grown spin or will they be borrowing from David Lareah’s quote book?

[Author]

Posts