- This topic has 75 replies, 11 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 5 months ago by
DWCAP.
-
AuthorPosts
-
December 16, 2008 at 5:22 PM #316884December 16, 2008 at 11:11 PM #316607
TheBreeze
ParticipantI’ve been following this rental market for a couple of years now and it seems like rents are starting to soften. For example, I don’t recall seeing any one bedrooms in the 92122 area code for less than $1300 and now there are supposedly some at $1165:
http://sandiego.craigslist.org/csd/apa/958805868.html
Rents on two bedrooms seem to be coming down even more than rents on one bedrooms. My guess is that unemployment and the extra capacity from the La Jolla Crossroads complex is helping to bring rents down.
December 16, 2008 at 11:11 PM #316957ParticipantI’ve been following this rental market for a couple of years now and it seems like rents are starting to soften. For example, I don’t recall seeing any one bedrooms in the 92122 area code for less than $1300 and now there are supposedly some at $1165:
http://sandiego.craigslist.org/csd/apa/958805868.html
Rents on two bedrooms seem to be coming down even more than rents on one bedrooms. My guess is that unemployment and the extra capacity from the La Jolla Crossroads complex is helping to bring rents down.
December 16, 2008 at 11:11 PM #316999ParticipantI’ve been following this rental market for a couple of years now and it seems like rents are starting to soften. For example, I don’t recall seeing any one bedrooms in the 92122 area code for less than $1300 and now there are supposedly some at $1165:
http://sandiego.craigslist.org/csd/apa/958805868.html
Rents on two bedrooms seem to be coming down even more than rents on one bedrooms. My guess is that unemployment and the extra capacity from the La Jolla Crossroads complex is helping to bring rents down.
December 16, 2008 at 11:11 PM #317020ParticipantI’ve been following this rental market for a couple of years now and it seems like rents are starting to soften. For example, I don’t recall seeing any one bedrooms in the 92122 area code for less than $1300 and now there are supposedly some at $1165:
http://sandiego.craigslist.org/csd/apa/958805868.html
Rents on two bedrooms seem to be coming down even more than rents on one bedrooms. My guess is that unemployment and the extra capacity from the La Jolla Crossroads complex is helping to bring rents down.
December 16, 2008 at 11:11 PM #317095ParticipantI’ve been following this rental market for a couple of years now and it seems like rents are starting to soften. For example, I don’t recall seeing any one bedrooms in the 92122 area code for less than $1300 and now there are supposedly some at $1165:
http://sandiego.craigslist.org/csd/apa/958805868.html
Rents on two bedrooms seem to be coming down even more than rents on one bedrooms. My guess is that unemployment and the extra capacity from the La Jolla Crossroads complex is helping to bring rents down.
December 17, 2008 at 12:31 AM #316631ParticipantHere you go, bro — rental market comparison reports from UCSD for 2008 and 2005:
2008: http://hds.ucsd.edu/hsgaffil/Market_Comp.pdf
2005: http://academicaffairs.ucsd.edu/offices/partneropp/RentalsComparisonOct2005.pdf
I can’t find the 2007 and 2006 reports online, but I have a copy of those saved to on my computer. If you want them, post an email and I’ll try to remember to check this thread again and email them to you.
This appears to be from April 2006:
No idea the date on this:
If you do some Google searches you may be able to find additional rental comparison reports.
December 17, 2008 at 12:31 AM #316982ParticipantHere you go, bro — rental market comparison reports from UCSD for 2008 and 2005:
2008: http://hds.ucsd.edu/hsgaffil/Market_Comp.pdf
2005: http://academicaffairs.ucsd.edu/offices/partneropp/RentalsComparisonOct2005.pdf
I can’t find the 2007 and 2006 reports online, but I have a copy of those saved to on my computer. If you want them, post an email and I’ll try to remember to check this thread again and email them to you.
This appears to be from April 2006:
No idea the date on this:
If you do some Google searches you may be able to find additional rental comparison reports.
December 17, 2008 at 12:31 AM #317023ParticipantHere you go, bro — rental market comparison reports from UCSD for 2008 and 2005:
2008: http://hds.ucsd.edu/hsgaffil/Market_Comp.pdf
2005: http://academicaffairs.ucsd.edu/offices/partneropp/RentalsComparisonOct2005.pdf
I can’t find the 2007 and 2006 reports online, but I have a copy of those saved to on my computer. If you want them, post an email and I’ll try to remember to check this thread again and email them to you.
This appears to be from April 2006:
No idea the date on this:
If you do some Google searches you may be able to find additional rental comparison reports.
December 17, 2008 at 12:31 AM #317045ParticipantHere you go, bro — rental market comparison reports from UCSD for 2008 and 2005:
2008: http://hds.ucsd.edu/hsgaffil/Market_Comp.pdf
2005: http://academicaffairs.ucsd.edu/offices/partneropp/RentalsComparisonOct2005.pdf
I can’t find the 2007 and 2006 reports online, but I have a copy of those saved to on my computer. If you want them, post an email and I’ll try to remember to check this thread again and email them to you.
This appears to be from April 2006:
No idea the date on this:
If you do some Google searches you may be able to find additional rental comparison reports.
December 17, 2008 at 12:31 AM #317119ParticipantHere you go, bro — rental market comparison reports from UCSD for 2008 and 2005:
2008: http://hds.ucsd.edu/hsgaffil/Market_Comp.pdf
2005: http://academicaffairs.ucsd.edu/offices/partneropp/RentalsComparisonOct2005.pdf
I can’t find the 2007 and 2006 reports online, but I have a copy of those saved to on my computer. If you want them, post an email and I’ll try to remember to check this thread again and email them to you.
This appears to be from April 2006:
No idea the date on this:
If you do some Google searches you may be able to find additional rental comparison reports.
December 17, 2008 at 12:33 AM #316627Eugene
Participantstockstradr have you ever heard the term “Employer of Last Resort”?
Your dramatic pictures of Second Great Depression unavoidably assume 20% or higher unemployment. But government always has the power to limit unemployment. This power is rarely used in the United States, because that entails deficit spending, expanded government involvement in the economy, and, generally, things that Republicans strongly dislike. Even if you can get Republicans to agree on deficit spending, they’d always prefer to do that through lower taxes rather than through direct job creation, which is obviously far less effective. And 6 out of 7 recent recessions took place under Republican president, Republican congress, or both. (The only exception was the 1980 recession, which was relatively short and ended around the same time when Carter lost the election to Reagan.)
This time we have a very liberal Democratic president, Democratic majority in the House, and we’re close to filibuster-proof Democratic majority in the Senate. So, this will be a very interesting and new experience. But a Second Great Depression it will be not. We will see bailouts galore, public works projects, low-to-no-interest loans given to municipal and state governments in an attempt to limit layoffs. We will more than likely see weakening dollar and strengthening export manufacturing. And that will continue till a) they succeed in turning the economy around or b) they fail and the Congress is replaced by a more fiscally conservative bunch in 2011.
December 17, 2008 at 12:33 AM #316977Participantstockstradr have you ever heard the term “Employer of Last Resort”?
Your dramatic pictures of Second Great Depression unavoidably assume 20% or higher unemployment. But government always has the power to limit unemployment. This power is rarely used in the United States, because that entails deficit spending, expanded government involvement in the economy, and, generally, things that Republicans strongly dislike. Even if you can get Republicans to agree on deficit spending, they’d always prefer to do that through lower taxes rather than through direct job creation, which is obviously far less effective. And 6 out of 7 recent recessions took place under Republican president, Republican congress, or both. (The only exception was the 1980 recession, which was relatively short and ended around the same time when Carter lost the election to Reagan.)
This time we have a very liberal Democratic president, Democratic majority in the House, and we’re close to filibuster-proof Democratic majority in the Senate. So, this will be a very interesting and new experience. But a Second Great Depression it will be not. We will see bailouts galore, public works projects, low-to-no-interest loans given to municipal and state governments in an attempt to limit layoffs. We will more than likely see weakening dollar and strengthening export manufacturing. And that will continue till a) they succeed in turning the economy around or b) they fail and the Congress is replaced by a more fiscally conservative bunch in 2011.
December 17, 2008 at 12:33 AM #317019Participantstockstradr have you ever heard the term “Employer of Last Resort”?
Your dramatic pictures of Second Great Depression unavoidably assume 20% or higher unemployment. But government always has the power to limit unemployment. This power is rarely used in the United States, because that entails deficit spending, expanded government involvement in the economy, and, generally, things that Republicans strongly dislike. Even if you can get Republicans to agree on deficit spending, they’d always prefer to do that through lower taxes rather than through direct job creation, which is obviously far less effective. And 6 out of 7 recent recessions took place under Republican president, Republican congress, or both. (The only exception was the 1980 recession, which was relatively short and ended around the same time when Carter lost the election to Reagan.)
This time we have a very liberal Democratic president, Democratic majority in the House, and we’re close to filibuster-proof Democratic majority in the Senate. So, this will be a very interesting and new experience. But a Second Great Depression it will be not. We will see bailouts galore, public works projects, low-to-no-interest loans given to municipal and state governments in an attempt to limit layoffs. We will more than likely see weakening dollar and strengthening export manufacturing. And that will continue till a) they succeed in turning the economy around or b) they fail and the Congress is replaced by a more fiscally conservative bunch in 2011.
December 17, 2008 at 12:33 AM #317040Participantstockstradr have you ever heard the term “Employer of Last Resort”?
Your dramatic pictures of Second Great Depression unavoidably assume 20% or higher unemployment. But government always has the power to limit unemployment. This power is rarely used in the United States, because that entails deficit spending, expanded government involvement in the economy, and, generally, things that Republicans strongly dislike. Even if you can get Republicans to agree on deficit spending, they’d always prefer to do that through lower taxes rather than through direct job creation, which is obviously far less effective. And 6 out of 7 recent recessions took place under Republican president, Republican congress, or both. (The only exception was the 1980 recession, which was relatively short and ended around the same time when Carter lost the election to Reagan.)
This time we have a very liberal Democratic president, Democratic majority in the House, and we’re close to filibuster-proof Democratic majority in the Senate. So, this will be a very interesting and new experience. But a Second Great Depression it will be not. We will see bailouts galore, public works projects, low-to-no-interest loans given to municipal and state governments in an attempt to limit layoffs. We will more than likely see weakening dollar and strengthening export manufacturing. And that will continue till a) they succeed in turning the economy around or b) they fail and the Congress is replaced by a more fiscally conservative bunch in 2011.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.