Gold Fever – Page 4 – Piggington's Econo-Almanac

This topic has 205 replies, 13 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 7 months ago by scaredyclassic.

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 206 total)

← 1 2 3 4 5 … 12 13 14 →

Author

Posts
September 20, 2009 at 8:38 AM #460012

4plexowner
Participant

“Gold bulls are telling people foreign countries are buying Gold and facts are facts, they are not. This would show in the COT report.”

where in the COT report do the US gold reserves show up?

Russia’s?

the IMF’s?

China’s?

aren’t we talking apples and oranges here?

the COT report shows open interest in the paper markets – foreign countries are buying physical gold and holding it in their hot little hands

what am I missing?

edit: China has recently banned the export of gold and is the 2nd largest producer of gold in the world – how would China increasing their gold reserves, or the Chinese people buying gold for investment, show up on the COT report?

September 20, 2009 at 9:01 AM #459228

Chris Scoreboard Johnston
Participant

My post is now on my blog showing exactly what my view is on this and why. Use this to critique me one way or the other on this topic after we see what happens.

http://www.iamafuturestrader.blogspot.com

Have to cut and paste, don’t know how to do this as a direct link and I am not going to spend the time to figure it out.

I would suspect if I turn out to be right it will be crickets, but if I turn out to be wrong will be pummeled. All I care about is how my actual trades I do work out, the rest is cocktail party fodder.

September 20, 2009 at 9:01 AM #459421

Chris Scoreboard Johnston
Participant

My post is now on my blog showing exactly what my view is on this and why. Use this to critique me one way or the other on this topic after we see what happens.

http://www.iamafuturestrader.blogspot.com

Have to cut and paste, don’t know how to do this as a direct link and I am not going to spend the time to figure it out.

I would suspect if I turn out to be right it will be crickets, but if I turn out to be wrong will be pummeled. All I care about is how my actual trades I do work out, the rest is cocktail party fodder.

September 20, 2009 at 9:01 AM #459757

Chris Scoreboard Johnston
Participant

My post is now on my blog showing exactly what my view is on this and why. Use this to critique me one way or the other on this topic after we see what happens.

http://www.iamafuturestrader.blogspot.com

Have to cut and paste, don’t know how to do this as a direct link and I am not going to spend the time to figure it out.

I would suspect if I turn out to be right it will be crickets, but if I turn out to be wrong will be pummeled. All I care about is how my actual trades I do work out, the rest is cocktail party fodder.

September 20, 2009 at 9:01 AM #459829

Chris Scoreboard Johnston
Participant

My post is now on my blog showing exactly what my view is on this and why. Use this to critique me one way or the other on this topic after we see what happens.

http://www.iamafuturestrader.blogspot.com

Have to cut and paste, don’t know how to do this as a direct link and I am not going to spend the time to figure it out.

I would suspect if I turn out to be right it will be crickets, but if I turn out to be wrong will be pummeled. All I care about is how my actual trades I do work out, the rest is cocktail party fodder.

September 20, 2009 at 9:01 AM #460021

Chris Scoreboard Johnston
Participant

My post is now on my blog showing exactly what my view is on this and why. Use this to critique me one way or the other on this topic after we see what happens.

http://www.iamafuturestrader.blogspot.com

Have to cut and paste, don’t know how to do this as a direct link and I am not going to spend the time to figure it out.

I would suspect if I turn out to be right it will be crickets, but if I turn out to be wrong will be pummeled. All I care about is how my actual trades I do work out, the rest is cocktail party fodder.

September 20, 2009 at 9:03 AM #459233

Chris Scoreboard Johnston
Participant

It would show up in the net positions if they were buying in large amounts. The net position would not be declining this much.

September 20, 2009 at 9:03 AM #459426

Chris Scoreboard Johnston
Participant

It would show up in the net positions if they were buying in large amounts. The net position would not be declining this much.

September 20, 2009 at 9:03 AM #459762

Chris Scoreboard Johnston
Participant

It would show up in the net positions if they were buying in large amounts. The net position would not be declining this much.

September 20, 2009 at 9:03 AM #459834

Chris Scoreboard Johnston
Participant

It would show up in the net positions if they were buying in large amounts. The net position would not be declining this much.

September 20, 2009 at 9:03 AM #460026

Chris Scoreboard Johnston
Participant

It would show up in the net positions if they were buying in large amounts. The net position would not be declining this much.

September 20, 2009 at 9:05 AM #459238

4plexowner
Participant

IMF to Proceed with Limited Sales of Gold
http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/survey/so/2009/POL091809A.htm

“up to 403.3 metric tons”

400 tons of gold that won’t show up in the COT report

September 20, 2009 at 9:05 AM #459431

4plexowner
Participant

IMF to Proceed with Limited Sales of Gold
http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/survey/so/2009/POL091809A.htm

“up to 403.3 metric tons”

400 tons of gold that won’t show up in the COT report

September 20, 2009 at 9:05 AM #459767

4plexowner
Participant

IMF to Proceed with Limited Sales of Gold
http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/survey/so/2009/POL091809A.htm

“up to 403.3 metric tons”

400 tons of gold that won’t show up in the COT report

September 20, 2009 at 9:05 AM #459839

4plexowner
Participant

IMF to Proceed with Limited Sales of Gold
http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/survey/so/2009/POL091809A.htm

“up to 403.3 metric tons”

400 tons of gold that won’t show up in the COT report
Author

Posts

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 206 total)

← 1 2 3 4 5 … 12 13 14 →

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.