Gay Marriage Ruling

[Anonymous]

Dukehorn, the Catholic church doesn’t recognize divorce. My father was raised Catholic, I wasn’t, but from what I understand if a couple gets divorced they can never remarry in the Catholic church. Someone correct me if I’m wrong.

I would think the government allows divorces because it would do more harm than good to force two people to remain financially and emotionally entangled who are now at odds with each other. I could see the murder and domestic violence rate increasing quite a bit if this were the case.

As far as masturbation, anal sex and oral sex, what moral majority are you talking about? I think that the moral majority only considers that deviant if it’s done by two people of the same sex (gay issue), done with animals, or done with children (pedophilia).

And I’m not worrying about anyone’s sex life. They can do whatever in private, just like they’ve always done. I just don’t want anyone asking or expecting me to support legislation for something I view as sacred and meant to be between a man and a woman.

[Mark Holmes]

Marion, you said:

“I just don’t want anyone asking or expecting me to support legislation for something I view as sacred and meant to be between a man and a woman.”

I’m sorry, but this law has nothing to do with the sacred rites performed in a church. It is about state contract law – Calfiornia marriage law. It is about civil rights. Mine, that is, not yours.

Amazing the sense of entitlement you people have. Do you have no shame?

[Mark Holmes]

Marion, you said:

“I just don’t want anyone asking or expecting me to support legislation for something I view as sacred and meant to be between a man and a woman.”

I’m sorry, but this law has nothing to do with the sacred rites performed in a church. It is about state contract law – Calfiornia marriage law. It is about civil rights. Mine, that is, not yours.

Amazing the sense of entitlement you people have. Do you have no shame?

[Mark Holmes]

Marion, you said:

“I just don’t want anyone asking or expecting me to support legislation for something I view as sacred and meant to be between a man and a woman.”

I’m sorry, but this law has nothing to do with the sacred rites performed in a church. It is about state contract law – Calfiornia marriage law. It is about civil rights. Mine, that is, not yours.

Amazing the sense of entitlement you people have. Do you have no shame?

[Mark Holmes]

Marion, you said:

“I just don’t want anyone asking or expecting me to support legislation for something I view as sacred and meant to be between a man and a woman.”

I’m sorry, but this law has nothing to do with the sacred rites performed in a church. It is about state contract law – Calfiornia marriage law. It is about civil rights. Mine, that is, not yours.

Amazing the sense of entitlement you people have. Do you have no shame?

[Mark Holmes]

Marion, you said:

“I just don’t want anyone asking or expecting me to support legislation for something I view as sacred and meant to be between a man and a woman.”

I’m sorry, but this law has nothing to do with the sacred rites performed in a church. It is about state contract law – Calfiornia marriage law. It is about civil rights. Mine, that is, not yours.

Amazing the sense of entitlement you people have. Do you have no shame?

[atr]

Hi Mark,

Thanks for the slippery slope post. I kept thinking, but didn’t post, “slippery slope! slippery slope!” as certain arguments were presented. You explained that nicely.

I also agree that this is a basic civil rights issue, not a religious issue. I will vote along these lines, I will raise my child to believe that all are entitled to such rights, and I will contribute to the community in such a way as to hopefully ensure a future where these rights are granted to all.

It makes me profoundly sad to think of this country continuing to be a place where two adults can’t choose to be legally joined. My hope for those that disagree would be that you could simply allow others to live and let live, and that definitely means that they be allowed to marry. You don’t have to like it, but legally, they should be entitled to it. I don’t have anything more profound than that to say, and others have said it better than I could, anyway.

[atr]

Hi Mark,

Thanks for the slippery slope post. I kept thinking, but didn’t post, “slippery slope! slippery slope!” as certain arguments were presented. You explained that nicely.

I also agree that this is a basic civil rights issue, not a religious issue. I will vote along these lines, I will raise my child to believe that all are entitled to such rights, and I will contribute to the community in such a way as to hopefully ensure a future where these rights are granted to all.

It makes me profoundly sad to think of this country continuing to be a place where two adults can’t choose to be legally joined. My hope for those that disagree would be that you could simply allow others to live and let live, and that definitely means that they be allowed to marry. You don’t have to like it, but legally, they should be entitled to it. I don’t have anything more profound than that to say, and others have said it better than I could, anyway.

[atr]

Hi Mark,

Thanks for the slippery slope post. I kept thinking, but didn’t post, “slippery slope! slippery slope!” as certain arguments were presented. You explained that nicely.

I also agree that this is a basic civil rights issue, not a religious issue. I will vote along these lines, I will raise my child to believe that all are entitled to such rights, and I will contribute to the community in such a way as to hopefully ensure a future where these rights are granted to all.

It makes me profoundly sad to think of this country continuing to be a place where two adults can’t choose to be legally joined. My hope for those that disagree would be that you could simply allow others to live and let live, and that definitely means that they be allowed to marry. You don’t have to like it, but legally, they should be entitled to it. I don’t have anything more profound than that to say, and others have said it better than I could, anyway.

[atr]

Hi Mark,

Thanks for the slippery slope post. I kept thinking, but didn’t post, “slippery slope! slippery slope!” as certain arguments were presented. You explained that nicely.

I also agree that this is a basic civil rights issue, not a religious issue. I will vote along these lines, I will raise my child to believe that all are entitled to such rights, and I will contribute to the community in such a way as to hopefully ensure a future where these rights are granted to all.

It makes me profoundly sad to think of this country continuing to be a place where two adults can’t choose to be legally joined. My hope for those that disagree would be that you could simply allow others to live and let live, and that definitely means that they be allowed to marry. You don’t have to like it, but legally, they should be entitled to it. I don’t have anything more profound than that to say, and others have said it better than I could, anyway.

[atr]

Hi Mark,

Thanks for the slippery slope post. I kept thinking, but didn’t post, “slippery slope! slippery slope!” as certain arguments were presented. You explained that nicely.

I also agree that this is a basic civil rights issue, not a religious issue. I will vote along these lines, I will raise my child to believe that all are entitled to such rights, and I will contribute to the community in such a way as to hopefully ensure a future where these rights are granted to all.

It makes me profoundly sad to think of this country continuing to be a place where two adults can’t choose to be legally joined. My hope for those that disagree would be that you could simply allow others to live and let live, and that definitely means that they be allowed to marry. You don’t have to like it, but legally, they should be entitled to it. I don’t have anything more profound than that to say, and others have said it better than I could, anyway.

[Bane]

“Mommy, why is that man allowed to have 5 wives?”?

So basically you want it made illegal, so that you do not have to explain to your children that others have different beliefs than them? That is simply absurd. How do you explain jews, muslims, or people of other races to your kids?

[Bane]

“Mommy, why is that man allowed to have 5 wives?”?

So basically you want it made illegal, so that you do not have to explain to your children that others have different beliefs than them? That is simply absurd. How do you explain jews, muslims, or people of other races to your kids?

[Bane]

“Mommy, why is that man allowed to have 5 wives?”?

So basically you want it made illegal, so that you do not have to explain to your children that others have different beliefs than them? That is simply absurd. How do you explain jews, muslims, or people of other races to your kids?

[Bane]

“Mommy, why is that man allowed to have 5 wives?”?

So basically you want it made illegal, so that you do not have to explain to your children that others have different beliefs than them? That is simply absurd. How do you explain jews, muslims, or people of other races to your kids?

[Author]

Posts