- This topic has 34 replies, 12 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 10 months ago by tangouniform.
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 7, 2007 at 10:05 PM #9248June 7, 2007 at 10:32 PM #57789little ladyParticipant
Hell yeah! I just saw a 5 bedroom foreclosure with a fireplace, 1970 in a good neighborhood, with good schools, in my neck of the woods listed @389k (repo) on the mls! There are currently 16 houses listed under 400k here.
June 7, 2007 at 10:32 PM #57814little ladyParticipantHell yeah! I just saw a 5 bedroom foreclosure with a fireplace, 1970 in a good neighborhood, with good schools, in my neck of the woods listed @389k (repo) on the mls! There are currently 16 houses listed under 400k here.
June 7, 2007 at 10:45 PM #57793SD RealtorParticipantCould be Perry… One thing I found was that many of the REO properties out there were simply not priced aggressively. I also noticed that when I looked up what the home went for at auction, it was evident that the lender was trying to sell the home on the MLS at a higher price.
I am sure we will see many more of these auctions like we saw a few weeks ago. Based on some of the posts that we saw after the first auction, it seems like there was alot of buying activity. I am not sure that people were getting the deals that they thought they were getting.
It will be interesting to see what will happen when the lenders finally start pricing the REO properties to really sell.
SD Realtor
June 7, 2007 at 10:45 PM #57818SD RealtorParticipantCould be Perry… One thing I found was that many of the REO properties out there were simply not priced aggressively. I also noticed that when I looked up what the home went for at auction, it was evident that the lender was trying to sell the home on the MLS at a higher price.
I am sure we will see many more of these auctions like we saw a few weeks ago. Based on some of the posts that we saw after the first auction, it seems like there was alot of buying activity. I am not sure that people were getting the deals that they thought they were getting.
It will be interesting to see what will happen when the lenders finally start pricing the REO properties to really sell.
SD Realtor
June 8, 2007 at 9:55 AM #57795SD RealtorParticipantdeleted, repeat…
SD Realtor
June 8, 2007 at 9:55 AM #57820SD RealtorParticipantdeleted, repeat…
SD Realtor
June 8, 2007 at 10:00 AM #57895donaldduckmooreParticipantLittlelady, what area is that?
June 8, 2007 at 10:00 AM #57920donaldduckmooreParticipantLittlelady, what area is that?
June 8, 2007 at 10:05 AM #57899donaldduckmooreParticipantThe big problem with the current house price still being elevated is because there are still lots of buyers. Unlike the housing bubble in the early 90s, there were not too many buyers. I am also waiting to buy but I guess the bubble will deflate very slowly this time because of all the subjective circumstances.
June 8, 2007 at 10:05 AM #57924donaldduckmooreParticipantThe big problem with the current house price still being elevated is because there are still lots of buyers. Unlike the housing bubble in the early 90s, there were not too many buyers. I am also waiting to buy but I guess the bubble will deflate very slowly this time because of all the subjective circumstances.
June 8, 2007 at 10:06 AM #57901BugsParticipantThe only reason I can think of that some banks aren’t being very agressive about their REOs is that they must be thinking they can manage their losses. If a bank was listening to one of the economists who are saying this will be over soon it would make sense to them to try and run the clock so as to not cause more defaults by contributing to the declining prices.
The head-in-sand approach would also appear attractive to any executive whose compensation involves quarterly performance bonuses based on stock prices.
I think these attempts are akin to rearranging deck chairs. Worse, really. Sooner or later they have to move those properties, and time is not on their side.
June 8, 2007 at 10:06 AM #57926BugsParticipantThe only reason I can think of that some banks aren’t being very agressive about their REOs is that they must be thinking they can manage their losses. If a bank was listening to one of the economists who are saying this will be over soon it would make sense to them to try and run the clock so as to not cause more defaults by contributing to the declining prices.
The head-in-sand approach would also appear attractive to any executive whose compensation involves quarterly performance bonuses based on stock prices.
I think these attempts are akin to rearranging deck chairs. Worse, really. Sooner or later they have to move those properties, and time is not on their side.
June 8, 2007 at 10:13 AM #57903farbetParticipantI have been to the courthouse auctions.I haven’t seen any of the houses on the MLS after 3 months.Why foreclose in the first place? why not accept a short sale and spare the great fools for buying over their heads in the first place??
Do the various banks like HSBC,Countrywide,Wells Fargo have favorite Realtors to sell these REO’s?June 8, 2007 at 10:13 AM #57929farbetParticipantI have been to the courthouse auctions.I haven’t seen any of the houses on the MLS after 3 months.Why foreclose in the first place? why not accept a short sale and spare the great fools for buying over their heads in the first place??
Do the various banks like HSBC,Countrywide,Wells Fargo have favorite Realtors to sell these REO’s? -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.