foreclosure wave about to hit — again! — and with a thunderous roar no less (per TG’s ladyfriend)

[Arraya]

[quote=CA renter]

Not sure why anyone would have ever questioned the existence of the “shadow inventory.” Where there’s smoke, there’s fire; and there was plenty of smoke.[/quote]

10 percent of SD mortgages are 60 days or more delinquent as of Feb. That is close to 60,000 homes. 60 day late or more is the point where default is well over 90% certain, normally.

60,000

[Huckleberry]

It appears Diana is backing up yesterdays article with another one today…

http://www.cnbc.com/id/36195838

She must be tapping into new sources of insider banking info. It sounds like she is fairly confident in her new predictions.

[Huckleberry]

It appears Diana is backing up yesterdays article with another one today…

http://www.cnbc.com/id/36195838

She must be tapping into new sources of insider banking info. It sounds like she is fairly confident in her new predictions.

[Huckleberry]

It appears Diana is backing up yesterdays article with another one today…

http://www.cnbc.com/id/36195838

She must be tapping into new sources of insider banking info. It sounds like she is fairly confident in her new predictions.

[Huckleberry]

It appears Diana is backing up yesterdays article with another one today…

http://www.cnbc.com/id/36195838

She must be tapping into new sources of insider banking info. It sounds like she is fairly confident in her new predictions.

[Huckleberry]

It appears Diana is backing up yesterdays article with another one today…

http://www.cnbc.com/id/36195838

She must be tapping into new sources of insider banking info. It sounds like she is fairly confident in her new predictions.

[CA renter]

[quote=SD Realtor]CAR the FHA and GSEs? Whew… good thing there is no taxpayer money at stake. I was worried for a moment![/quote]

Right. Unfortunately, I think we will be paying for this (loss of purchasing power, higher taxes, fewer services, lower quality of life, etc.) for decades/generations to come. I’m really ticked off about it, quite frankly, because it was done solely to enrich those who caused the crisis — at the expense of everyone else.

[CA renter]

[quote=SD Realtor]CAR the FHA and GSEs? Whew… good thing there is no taxpayer money at stake. I was worried for a moment![/quote]

Right. Unfortunately, I think we will be paying for this (loss of purchasing power, higher taxes, fewer services, lower quality of life, etc.) for decades/generations to come. I’m really ticked off about it, quite frankly, because it was done solely to enrich those who caused the crisis — at the expense of everyone else.

[CA renter]

[quote=SD Realtor]CAR the FHA and GSEs? Whew… good thing there is no taxpayer money at stake. I was worried for a moment![/quote]

Right. Unfortunately, I think we will be paying for this (loss of purchasing power, higher taxes, fewer services, lower quality of life, etc.) for decades/generations to come. I’m really ticked off about it, quite frankly, because it was done solely to enrich those who caused the crisis — at the expense of everyone else.

[CA renter]

[quote=SD Realtor]CAR the FHA and GSEs? Whew… good thing there is no taxpayer money at stake. I was worried for a moment![/quote]

Right. Unfortunately, I think we will be paying for this (loss of purchasing power, higher taxes, fewer services, lower quality of life, etc.) for decades/generations to come. I’m really ticked off about it, quite frankly, because it was done solely to enrich those who caused the crisis — at the expense of everyone else.

[CA renter]

[quote=SD Realtor]CAR the FHA and GSEs? Whew… good thing there is no taxpayer money at stake. I was worried for a moment![/quote]

Right. Unfortunately, I think we will be paying for this (loss of purchasing power, higher taxes, fewer services, lower quality of life, etc.) for decades/generations to come. I’m really ticked off about it, quite frankly, because it was done solely to enrich those who caused the crisis — at the expense of everyone else.

[temeculaguy]

[quote=Huckleberry]It appears Diana is backing up yesterdays article with another one today…

http://www.cnbc.com/id/36195838

She must be tapping into new sources of insider banking info. It sounds like she is fairly confident in her new predictions.[/quote]

She’s got a number of inside sources and based on her comments and confidence, something is about to happen. I personally think that they are going to make an effort to clear the backlog this year, while inventories and interest rates are low. The guy she interviewed did pretty well, even with the pressure she was putting on him. She looked confident. Not her best look, she looks better when she’s outside and the hair is not so poofy but that confidence is just plain sexy. GGGrrrrr!

[temeculaguy]

[quote=Huckleberry]It appears Diana is backing up yesterdays article with another one today…

http://www.cnbc.com/id/36195838

She must be tapping into new sources of insider banking info. It sounds like she is fairly confident in her new predictions.[/quote]

She’s got a number of inside sources and based on her comments and confidence, something is about to happen. I personally think that they are going to make an effort to clear the backlog this year, while inventories and interest rates are low. The guy she interviewed did pretty well, even with the pressure she was putting on him. She looked confident. Not her best look, she looks better when she’s outside and the hair is not so poofy but that confidence is just plain sexy. GGGrrrrr!

[temeculaguy]

[quote=Huckleberry]It appears Diana is backing up yesterdays article with another one today…

http://www.cnbc.com/id/36195838

She must be tapping into new sources of insider banking info. It sounds like she is fairly confident in her new predictions.[/quote]

She’s got a number of inside sources and based on her comments and confidence, something is about to happen. I personally think that they are going to make an effort to clear the backlog this year, while inventories and interest rates are low. The guy she interviewed did pretty well, even with the pressure she was putting on him. She looked confident. Not her best look, she looks better when she’s outside and the hair is not so poofy but that confidence is just plain sexy. GGGrrrrr!

[temeculaguy]

[quote=Huckleberry]It appears Diana is backing up yesterdays article with another one today…

http://www.cnbc.com/id/36195838

She must be tapping into new sources of insider banking info. It sounds like she is fairly confident in her new predictions.[/quote]

She’s got a number of inside sources and based on her comments and confidence, something is about to happen. I personally think that they are going to make an effort to clear the backlog this year, while inventories and interest rates are low. The guy she interviewed did pretty well, even with the pressure she was putting on him. She looked confident. Not her best look, she looks better when she’s outside and the hair is not so poofy but that confidence is just plain sexy. GGGrrrrr!

[Author]

Posts