Fed Refuses to Disclose Recipients of $2 Trillion in Lending

[Arraya]

The public lives in sound bites and does not read Bloomberg. Most only have a vague idea what they Fed does. Besides they are not talking about it on Fox and Friends, so it can’t be that important.

Funniest line from the article…

In response to Bloomberg’s request, the Fed said the U.S. is facing “an unprecedented crisis” in which “loss in confidence in and between financial institutions can occur with lightning speed and devastating effects.”

So transparency will cause a loss of confidence. Hmmm….. They can’t hide those assets for ever. There will be a day of reckoning…

[The OC Scam]

It seems to me that Bernanke and Paulson are running our country right now. Doesn’t matter what the congress think or people…there is no more “We the People”

[The OC Scam]

It seems to me that Bernanke and Paulson are running our country right now. Doesn’t matter what the congress think or people…there is no more “We the People”

[The OC Scam]

It seems to me that Bernanke and Paulson are running our country right now. Doesn’t matter what the congress think or people…there is no more “We the People”

[The OC Scam]

It seems to me that Bernanke and Paulson are running our country right now. Doesn’t matter what the congress think or people…there is no more “We the People”

[The OC Scam]

It seems to me that Bernanke and Paulson are running our country right now. Doesn’t matter what the congress think or people…there is no more “We the People”

[Arraya]

I’ll put it this way: I think this little economic episode has been quite revealing in regards to the Fed-Wall Street-DC nexus. After a while you start wondering who really runs things and how long as it been this way. Definitely interesting times….

[Arraya]

I’ll put it this way: I think this little economic episode has been quite revealing in regards to the Fed-Wall Street-DC nexus. After a while you start wondering who really runs things and how long as it been this way. Definitely interesting times….

[Arraya]

I’ll put it this way: I think this little economic episode has been quite revealing in regards to the Fed-Wall Street-DC nexus. After a while you start wondering who really runs things and how long as it been this way. Definitely interesting times….

[Arraya]

I’ll put it this way: I think this little economic episode has been quite revealing in regards to the Fed-Wall Street-DC nexus. After a while you start wondering who really runs things and how long as it been this way. Definitely interesting times….

[Arraya]

I’ll put it this way: I think this little economic episode has been quite revealing in regards to the Fed-Wall Street-DC nexus. After a while you start wondering who really runs things and how long as it been this way. Definitely interesting times….

[Arraya]

http://www.chrismartenson.com/blog/fed-refuses-disclose-recipients-2-trillion-lending/10144

Today the Federal Reserve effectively freaked out in the foxhole and declared the spirit of democracy, if not the rule of law, to be disposable conveniences of better times.

In response to a freedom of information act request by Bloomberg News for the names of the institutions receiving public money, the Fed invoked an obscure rule to block the release of this information.

Dec. 12 (Bloomberg) — The Federal Reserve refused a request by Bloomberg News to disclose the recipients of more than $2 trillion of emergency loans from U.S. taxpayers and the assets the central bank is accepting as collateral.

Bloomberg filed suit Nov. 7 under the U.S. Freedom of Information Act requesting details about the terms of 11 Fed lending programs, most created during the deepest financial crisis since the Great Depression.

The Fed responded Dec. 8, saying it’s allowed to withhold internal memos as well as information about trade secrets and commercial information.

Trade secrets? A trade secret is something like the formula for Coke. A trade secret is a patented business process the release of which would harm the competitive position of the holder. I am really at a complete loss to understand what sort of “trade secrets” might apply to the acquisition of bad debt from poorly managed financial institutions.

If anybody can supply one that might make sense in this situation I am all ears.

The important principle here is that democracy cannot operate under the cover of darkness. If every emergency, no matter how slight, results in the immediate suspension of our right to know, then one might reasonably question whether it is a right at all and whether this is a democracy.

[Arraya]

http://www.chrismartenson.com/blog/fed-refuses-disclose-recipients-2-trillion-lending/10144

Today the Federal Reserve effectively freaked out in the foxhole and declared the spirit of democracy, if not the rule of law, to be disposable conveniences of better times.

In response to a freedom of information act request by Bloomberg News for the names of the institutions receiving public money, the Fed invoked an obscure rule to block the release of this information.

Dec. 12 (Bloomberg) — The Federal Reserve refused a request by Bloomberg News to disclose the recipients of more than $2 trillion of emergency loans from U.S. taxpayers and the assets the central bank is accepting as collateral.

Bloomberg filed suit Nov. 7 under the U.S. Freedom of Information Act requesting details about the terms of 11 Fed lending programs, most created during the deepest financial crisis since the Great Depression.

The Fed responded Dec. 8, saying it’s allowed to withhold internal memos as well as information about trade secrets and commercial information.

Trade secrets? A trade secret is something like the formula for Coke. A trade secret is a patented business process the release of which would harm the competitive position of the holder. I am really at a complete loss to understand what sort of “trade secrets” might apply to the acquisition of bad debt from poorly managed financial institutions.

If anybody can supply one that might make sense in this situation I am all ears.

The important principle here is that democracy cannot operate under the cover of darkness. If every emergency, no matter how slight, results in the immediate suspension of our right to know, then one might reasonably question whether it is a right at all and whether this is a democracy.

[Arraya]

http://www.chrismartenson.com/blog/fed-refuses-disclose-recipients-2-trillion-lending/10144

Today the Federal Reserve effectively freaked out in the foxhole and declared the spirit of democracy, if not the rule of law, to be disposable conveniences of better times.

In response to a freedom of information act request by Bloomberg News for the names of the institutions receiving public money, the Fed invoked an obscure rule to block the release of this information.

Dec. 12 (Bloomberg) — The Federal Reserve refused a request by Bloomberg News to disclose the recipients of more than $2 trillion of emergency loans from U.S. taxpayers and the assets the central bank is accepting as collateral.

Bloomberg filed suit Nov. 7 under the U.S. Freedom of Information Act requesting details about the terms of 11 Fed lending programs, most created during the deepest financial crisis since the Great Depression.

The Fed responded Dec. 8, saying it’s allowed to withhold internal memos as well as information about trade secrets and commercial information.

Trade secrets? A trade secret is something like the formula for Coke. A trade secret is a patented business process the release of which would harm the competitive position of the holder. I am really at a complete loss to understand what sort of “trade secrets” might apply to the acquisition of bad debt from poorly managed financial institutions.

If anybody can supply one that might make sense in this situation I am all ears.

The important principle here is that democracy cannot operate under the cover of darkness. If every emergency, no matter how slight, results in the immediate suspension of our right to know, then one might reasonably question whether it is a right at all and whether this is a democracy.

[Arraya]

http://www.chrismartenson.com/blog/fed-refuses-disclose-recipients-2-trillion-lending/10144

Today the Federal Reserve effectively freaked out in the foxhole and declared the spirit of democracy, if not the rule of law, to be disposable conveniences of better times.

In response to a freedom of information act request by Bloomberg News for the names of the institutions receiving public money, the Fed invoked an obscure rule to block the release of this information.

Dec. 12 (Bloomberg) — The Federal Reserve refused a request by Bloomberg News to disclose the recipients of more than $2 trillion of emergency loans from U.S. taxpayers and the assets the central bank is accepting as collateral.

Bloomberg filed suit Nov. 7 under the U.S. Freedom of Information Act requesting details about the terms of 11 Fed lending programs, most created during the deepest financial crisis since the Great Depression.

The Fed responded Dec. 8, saying it’s allowed to withhold internal memos as well as information about trade secrets and commercial information.

Trade secrets? A trade secret is something like the formula for Coke. A trade secret is a patented business process the release of which would harm the competitive position of the holder. I am really at a complete loss to understand what sort of “trade secrets” might apply to the acquisition of bad debt from poorly managed financial institutions.

If anybody can supply one that might make sense in this situation I am all ears.

The important principle here is that democracy cannot operate under the cover of darkness. If every emergency, no matter how slight, results in the immediate suspension of our right to know, then one might reasonably question whether it is a right at all and whether this is a democracy.

[Author]

Posts