- This topic has 550 replies, 18 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 3 months ago by
urbanrealtor.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 14, 2011 at 2:27 PM #667385February 14, 2011 at 2:31 PM #666251
Anonymous
GuestBrian gets one point for mentioning the Missouri Compromise. It serves as pretty compelling evidence that many in the North did give some of a shit about slavery.
But Brian loses twenty points for the line about “the right” and Obama. Why do you insist on throwing these weak, worthless jabs into your posts?
We aren’t going the settle the slavery/Civil War debate here. I just hope the next generation is educated enough that they will be able to understand the debate.
February 14, 2011 at 2:31 PM #666312GuestBrian gets one point for mentioning the Missouri Compromise. It serves as pretty compelling evidence that many in the North did give some of a shit about slavery.
But Brian loses twenty points for the line about “the right” and Obama. Why do you insist on throwing these weak, worthless jabs into your posts?
We aren’t going the settle the slavery/Civil War debate here. I just hope the next generation is educated enough that they will be able to understand the debate.
February 14, 2011 at 2:31 PM #666915GuestBrian gets one point for mentioning the Missouri Compromise. It serves as pretty compelling evidence that many in the North did give some of a shit about slavery.
But Brian loses twenty points for the line about “the right” and Obama. Why do you insist on throwing these weak, worthless jabs into your posts?
We aren’t going the settle the slavery/Civil War debate here. I just hope the next generation is educated enough that they will be able to understand the debate.
February 14, 2011 at 2:31 PM #667054GuestBrian gets one point for mentioning the Missouri Compromise. It serves as pretty compelling evidence that many in the North did give some of a shit about slavery.
But Brian loses twenty points for the line about “the right” and Obama. Why do you insist on throwing these weak, worthless jabs into your posts?
We aren’t going the settle the slavery/Civil War debate here. I just hope the next generation is educated enough that they will be able to understand the debate.
February 14, 2011 at 2:31 PM #667390GuestBrian gets one point for mentioning the Missouri Compromise. It serves as pretty compelling evidence that many in the North did give some of a shit about slavery.
But Brian loses twenty points for the line about “the right” and Obama. Why do you insist on throwing these weak, worthless jabs into your posts?
We aren’t going the settle the slavery/Civil War debate here. I just hope the next generation is educated enough that they will be able to understand the debate.
February 14, 2011 at 2:35 PM #666261Djshakes
Participant[quote=pri_dk]Brian gets one point for mentioning the Missouri Compromise. It serves as pretty compelling evidence that many the North did give some of a shit about slavery.
But Brian loses twenty points for the line about “the right” and Obama. Why do you insist on throwing these weak, worthless jabs into your posts?
We aren’t going the settle the slavery/Civil War debate here. I just hope the next generation is educated enough that they will be able to understand the debate.[/quote]
I will also give credit for the mentioning of slavery as one of the reasons…of the many. The North did give a shit or they wouldn’t have fought for the 3/5’s clause. You will always her uneducated people rag on the constitution as being a racist document because it only considered blacks 3/5’s of a person but that clause was actually added to help free the slaves.
February 14, 2011 at 2:35 PM #666322Participant[quote=pri_dk]Brian gets one point for mentioning the Missouri Compromise. It serves as pretty compelling evidence that many the North did give some of a shit about slavery.
But Brian loses twenty points for the line about “the right” and Obama. Why do you insist on throwing these weak, worthless jabs into your posts?
We aren’t going the settle the slavery/Civil War debate here. I just hope the next generation is educated enough that they will be able to understand the debate.[/quote]
I will also give credit for the mentioning of slavery as one of the reasons…of the many. The North did give a shit or they wouldn’t have fought for the 3/5’s clause. You will always her uneducated people rag on the constitution as being a racist document because it only considered blacks 3/5’s of a person but that clause was actually added to help free the slaves.
February 14, 2011 at 2:35 PM #666925Participant[quote=pri_dk]Brian gets one point for mentioning the Missouri Compromise. It serves as pretty compelling evidence that many the North did give some of a shit about slavery.
But Brian loses twenty points for the line about “the right” and Obama. Why do you insist on throwing these weak, worthless jabs into your posts?
We aren’t going the settle the slavery/Civil War debate here. I just hope the next generation is educated enough that they will be able to understand the debate.[/quote]
I will also give credit for the mentioning of slavery as one of the reasons…of the many. The North did give a shit or they wouldn’t have fought for the 3/5’s clause. You will always her uneducated people rag on the constitution as being a racist document because it only considered blacks 3/5’s of a person but that clause was actually added to help free the slaves.
February 14, 2011 at 2:35 PM #667064Participant[quote=pri_dk]Brian gets one point for mentioning the Missouri Compromise. It serves as pretty compelling evidence that many the North did give some of a shit about slavery.
But Brian loses twenty points for the line about “the right” and Obama. Why do you insist on throwing these weak, worthless jabs into your posts?
We aren’t going the settle the slavery/Civil War debate here. I just hope the next generation is educated enough that they will be able to understand the debate.[/quote]
I will also give credit for the mentioning of slavery as one of the reasons…of the many. The North did give a shit or they wouldn’t have fought for the 3/5’s clause. You will always her uneducated people rag on the constitution as being a racist document because it only considered blacks 3/5’s of a person but that clause was actually added to help free the slaves.
February 14, 2011 at 2:35 PM #667400Participant[quote=pri_dk]Brian gets one point for mentioning the Missouri Compromise. It serves as pretty compelling evidence that many the North did give some of a shit about slavery.
But Brian loses twenty points for the line about “the right” and Obama. Why do you insist on throwing these weak, worthless jabs into your posts?
We aren’t going the settle the slavery/Civil War debate here. I just hope the next generation is educated enough that they will be able to understand the debate.[/quote]
I will also give credit for the mentioning of slavery as one of the reasons…of the many. The North did give a shit or they wouldn’t have fought for the 3/5’s clause. You will always her uneducated people rag on the constitution as being a racist document because it only considered blacks 3/5’s of a person but that clause was actually added to help free the slaves.
February 14, 2011 at 2:36 PM #666266briansd1
Guest[quote=pri_dk]
But Brian loses twenty points for the line about “the right” and Obama. Why do you insist on throwing these weak, worthless jabs into your posts?
[/quote]
Ok I apologize. My point was obtuse and badly made.
It seems to me like many Americans now are so ashamed of the history of slavery that they want to argue that it was not about slavery but about states rights.
February 14, 2011 at 2:36 PM #666327Guest[quote=pri_dk]
But Brian loses twenty points for the line about “the right” and Obama. Why do you insist on throwing these weak, worthless jabs into your posts?
[/quote]
Ok I apologize. My point was obtuse and badly made.
It seems to me like many Americans now are so ashamed of the history of slavery that they want to argue that it was not about slavery but about states rights.
February 14, 2011 at 2:36 PM #666930Guest[quote=pri_dk]
But Brian loses twenty points for the line about “the right” and Obama. Why do you insist on throwing these weak, worthless jabs into your posts?
[/quote]
Ok I apologize. My point was obtuse and badly made.
It seems to me like many Americans now are so ashamed of the history of slavery that they want to argue that it was not about slavery but about states rights.
February 14, 2011 at 2:36 PM #667069Guest[quote=pri_dk]
But Brian loses twenty points for the line about “the right” and Obama. Why do you insist on throwing these weak, worthless jabs into your posts?
[/quote]
Ok I apologize. My point was obtuse and badly made.
It seems to me like many Americans now are so ashamed of the history of slavery that they want to argue that it was not about slavery but about states rights.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.