- This topic has 550 replies, 18 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 3 months ago by
urbanrealtor.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 14, 2011 at 12:33 PM #667308February 14, 2011 at 12:35 PM #666175
scaredyclassic
ParticipantAre there really any indisputable facts?
It’s always a story.
February 14, 2011 at 12:35 PM #666235ParticipantAre there really any indisputable facts?
It’s always a story.
February 14, 2011 at 12:35 PM #666840ParticipantAre there really any indisputable facts?
It’s always a story.
February 14, 2011 at 12:35 PM #666978ParticipantAre there really any indisputable facts?
It’s always a story.
February 14, 2011 at 12:35 PM #667313ParticipantAre there really any indisputable facts?
It’s always a story.
February 14, 2011 at 12:42 PM #666185briansd1
Guest[quote=Allan from Fallbrook] My son and his classmates were told that the Civil War was fought over slavery (it wasn’t), and nary a mention of the real reasons behind the war.
[/quote]That’s debatable.
Although some would arque the the Civil War was over state rights, the evidence is that the war was indeed over slavery.
I happen to think that economics trumps all other issues. And without slavery, the South had no economy.
February 14, 2011 at 12:42 PM #666245Guest[quote=Allan from Fallbrook] My son and his classmates were told that the Civil War was fought over slavery (it wasn’t), and nary a mention of the real reasons behind the war.
[/quote]That’s debatable.
Although some would arque the the Civil War was over state rights, the evidence is that the war was indeed over slavery.
I happen to think that economics trumps all other issues. And without slavery, the South had no economy.
February 14, 2011 at 12:42 PM #666850Guest[quote=Allan from Fallbrook] My son and his classmates were told that the Civil War was fought over slavery (it wasn’t), and nary a mention of the real reasons behind the war.
[/quote]That’s debatable.
Although some would arque the the Civil War was over state rights, the evidence is that the war was indeed over slavery.
I happen to think that economics trumps all other issues. And without slavery, the South had no economy.
February 14, 2011 at 12:42 PM #666988Guest[quote=Allan from Fallbrook] My son and his classmates were told that the Civil War was fought over slavery (it wasn’t), and nary a mention of the real reasons behind the war.
[/quote]That’s debatable.
Although some would arque the the Civil War was over state rights, the evidence is that the war was indeed over slavery.
I happen to think that economics trumps all other issues. And without slavery, the South had no economy.
February 14, 2011 at 12:42 PM #667323Guest[quote=Allan from Fallbrook] My son and his classmates were told that the Civil War was fought over slavery (it wasn’t), and nary a mention of the real reasons behind the war.
[/quote]That’s debatable.
Although some would arque the the Civil War was over state rights, the evidence is that the war was indeed over slavery.
I happen to think that economics trumps all other issues. And without slavery, the South had no economy.
February 14, 2011 at 1:42 PM #666206Allan from Fallbrook
Participant[quote=briansd1][quote=Allan from Fallbrook] My son and his classmates were told that the Civil War was fought over slavery (it wasn’t), and nary a mention of the real reasons behind the war.
[/quote]That’s debatable.
Although some would arque the the Civil War was over state rights, the evidence is that the war was indeed over slavery.
I happen to think that economics trumps all other issues. And without slavery, the South had no economy.[/quote]
Brian: Debatable? Not from the Northern point of view. The war started in 1861, but the Emancipation Proclamation wasn’t signed until 1863. Bluntly stated, the North really didn’t give much of a shit about slavery, and Lincoln’s own writings and speeches confirm this.
This was the collision of two competing cultures: A rapidly industrializing North and the South, which was wholly dependent on King Cotton. You’re correct about economics trumping all else, and it did in this case, but for different reasons.
None of those different reasons are discussed in class anymore, however. We’re too busy focusing on self-esteem and thinking good thoughts and not using hurtful words.
February 14, 2011 at 1:42 PM #666265Participant[quote=briansd1][quote=Allan from Fallbrook] My son and his classmates were told that the Civil War was fought over slavery (it wasn’t), and nary a mention of the real reasons behind the war.
[/quote]That’s debatable.
Although some would arque the the Civil War was over state rights, the evidence is that the war was indeed over slavery.
I happen to think that economics trumps all other issues. And without slavery, the South had no economy.[/quote]
Brian: Debatable? Not from the Northern point of view. The war started in 1861, but the Emancipation Proclamation wasn’t signed until 1863. Bluntly stated, the North really didn’t give much of a shit about slavery, and Lincoln’s own writings and speeches confirm this.
This was the collision of two competing cultures: A rapidly industrializing North and the South, which was wholly dependent on King Cotton. You’re correct about economics trumping all else, and it did in this case, but for different reasons.
None of those different reasons are discussed in class anymore, however. We’re too busy focusing on self-esteem and thinking good thoughts and not using hurtful words.
February 14, 2011 at 1:42 PM #666870Participant[quote=briansd1][quote=Allan from Fallbrook] My son and his classmates were told that the Civil War was fought over slavery (it wasn’t), and nary a mention of the real reasons behind the war.
[/quote]That’s debatable.
Although some would arque the the Civil War was over state rights, the evidence is that the war was indeed over slavery.
I happen to think that economics trumps all other issues. And without slavery, the South had no economy.[/quote]
Brian: Debatable? Not from the Northern point of view. The war started in 1861, but the Emancipation Proclamation wasn’t signed until 1863. Bluntly stated, the North really didn’t give much of a shit about slavery, and Lincoln’s own writings and speeches confirm this.
This was the collision of two competing cultures: A rapidly industrializing North and the South, which was wholly dependent on King Cotton. You’re correct about economics trumping all else, and it did in this case, but for different reasons.
None of those different reasons are discussed in class anymore, however. We’re too busy focusing on self-esteem and thinking good thoughts and not using hurtful words.
February 14, 2011 at 1:42 PM #667008Participant[quote=briansd1][quote=Allan from Fallbrook] My son and his classmates were told that the Civil War was fought over slavery (it wasn’t), and nary a mention of the real reasons behind the war.
[/quote]That’s debatable.
Although some would arque the the Civil War was over state rights, the evidence is that the war was indeed over slavery.
I happen to think that economics trumps all other issues. And without slavery, the South had no economy.[/quote]
Brian: Debatable? Not from the Northern point of view. The war started in 1861, but the Emancipation Proclamation wasn’t signed until 1863. Bluntly stated, the North really didn’t give much of a shit about slavery, and Lincoln’s own writings and speeches confirm this.
This was the collision of two competing cultures: A rapidly industrializing North and the South, which was wholly dependent on King Cotton. You’re correct about economics trumping all else, and it did in this case, but for different reasons.
None of those different reasons are discussed in class anymore, however. We’re too busy focusing on self-esteem and thinking good thoughts and not using hurtful words.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.