Home › Forums › Closed Forums › Buying and Selling RE › Commercial Real Estate Construction Cost
- This topic has 10 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 9 months ago by UCGal.
-
AuthorPosts
-
July 20, 2010 at 7:07 AM #17726July 20, 2010 at 7:30 AM #580275DataAgentParticipant
Does the $293M include land acquisition costs? Or does the city already own the land?
July 20, 2010 at 7:30 AM #580369DataAgentParticipantDoes the $293M include land acquisition costs? Or does the city already own the land?
July 20, 2010 at 7:30 AM #580899DataAgentParticipantDoes the $293M include land acquisition costs? Or does the city already own the land?
July 20, 2010 at 7:30 AM #581003DataAgentParticipantDoes the $293M include land acquisition costs? Or does the city already own the land?
July 20, 2010 at 7:30 AM #581306DataAgentParticipantDoes the $293M include land acquisition costs? Or does the city already own the land?
July 20, 2010 at 4:21 PM #580485UCGalParticipant[quote=DataAgent]Does the $293M include land acquisition costs? Or does the city already own the land?[/quote]
The article says it would be built where Golden Hall is – adjacent to the current city building. In other words – the city already owns the land.I think it would be cheaper to buy some existing office buildings and retrofit. I’ve seen some “see-through” Class A buildings that would be prime candidates for satellite offices. The county does well with their main facility, then various regional facilities. The city should emulate that model.
July 20, 2010 at 4:21 PM #580579UCGalParticipant[quote=DataAgent]Does the $293M include land acquisition costs? Or does the city already own the land?[/quote]
The article says it would be built where Golden Hall is – adjacent to the current city building. In other words – the city already owns the land.I think it would be cheaper to buy some existing office buildings and retrofit. I’ve seen some “see-through” Class A buildings that would be prime candidates for satellite offices. The county does well with their main facility, then various regional facilities. The city should emulate that model.
July 20, 2010 at 4:21 PM #581108UCGalParticipant[quote=DataAgent]Does the $293M include land acquisition costs? Or does the city already own the land?[/quote]
The article says it would be built where Golden Hall is – adjacent to the current city building. In other words – the city already owns the land.I think it would be cheaper to buy some existing office buildings and retrofit. I’ve seen some “see-through” Class A buildings that would be prime candidates for satellite offices. The county does well with their main facility, then various regional facilities. The city should emulate that model.
July 20, 2010 at 4:21 PM #581214UCGalParticipant[quote=DataAgent]Does the $293M include land acquisition costs? Or does the city already own the land?[/quote]
The article says it would be built where Golden Hall is – adjacent to the current city building. In other words – the city already owns the land.I think it would be cheaper to buy some existing office buildings and retrofit. I’ve seen some “see-through” Class A buildings that would be prime candidates for satellite offices. The county does well with their main facility, then various regional facilities. The city should emulate that model.
July 20, 2010 at 4:21 PM #581516UCGalParticipant[quote=DataAgent]Does the $293M include land acquisition costs? Or does the city already own the land?[/quote]
The article says it would be built where Golden Hall is – adjacent to the current city building. In other words – the city already owns the land.I think it would be cheaper to buy some existing office buildings and retrofit. I’ve seen some “see-through” Class A buildings that would be prime candidates for satellite offices. The county does well with their main facility, then various regional facilities. The city should emulate that model.
-
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘Buying and Selling RE’ is closed to new topics and replies.