Commercial RE at Fire Sale Prices

[Dougie944]

I have to call BS on this story even though I agree with the commercial property values are falling theme.

The John Hancock Tower in Boston was a very high profile auction. In 2006 it was purchased for $1.3 billion. This year it auctioned for $660 million. The article claims it sold for $20 million. I got the real price with about 1 minute of research. That is not even remotely close so I question the accuracy of the rest of the article.

A lot of these commercial real estate funds are buying up the debt in order to step in and acquire the properties when they default. I assure you nobody is acquiring 40 story skyscrapers in NYC for $100,000.

[La Jolla Renter]

peterb, which ones?

[La Jolla Renter]

peterb, which ones?

[La Jolla Renter]

peterb, which ones?

[La Jolla Renter]

peterb, which ones?

[La Jolla Renter]

peterb, which ones?

[peterb]

REG and SPG. Even got in on TOL again.

[peterb]

REG and SPG. Even got in on TOL again.

[peterb]

REG and SPG. Even got in on TOL again.

[peterb]

REG and SPG. Even got in on TOL again.

[peterb]

REG and SPG. Even got in on TOL again.

[svelte]

Well, the $100K is a teaser all right. I didn’t believe it when I read it either.

You have to dig a little deeper into the article to see what they are really saying is that buyers are putting in some cash and assuming the debt on these properties:

…they are selling skyscrapers at a drastic discount, with the condition that the new buyer take on the enormous amounts of debt connected to the properties.

I’m assuming that means someone got that 40 story building + a mountain of debt for $100K.

[svelte]

Well, the $100K is a teaser all right. I didn’t believe it when I read it either.

You have to dig a little deeper into the article to see what they are really saying is that buyers are putting in some cash and assuming the debt on these properties:

…they are selling skyscrapers at a drastic discount, with the condition that the new buyer take on the enormous amounts of debt connected to the properties.

I’m assuming that means someone got that 40 story building + a mountain of debt for $100K.

[svelte]

Well, the $100K is a teaser all right. I didn’t believe it when I read it either.

You have to dig a little deeper into the article to see what they are really saying is that buyers are putting in some cash and assuming the debt on these properties:

…they are selling skyscrapers at a drastic discount, with the condition that the new buyer take on the enormous amounts of debt connected to the properties.

I’m assuming that means someone got that 40 story building + a mountain of debt for $100K.

[svelte]

Well, the $100K is a teaser all right. I didn’t believe it when I read it either.

You have to dig a little deeper into the article to see what they are really saying is that buyers are putting in some cash and assuming the debt on these properties:

…they are selling skyscrapers at a drastic discount, with the condition that the new buyer take on the enormous amounts of debt connected to the properties.

I’m assuming that means someone got that 40 story building + a mountain of debt for $100K.

[Author]

Posts