- This topic has 55 replies, 9 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 7 months ago by temeculaguy.
-
AuthorPosts
-
October 7, 2008 at 11:32 PM #283429October 8, 2008 at 10:24 AM #283273crParticipant
I’m glad to see Realtors waking up to reality, at least those who denied there was a bubble, but 10% is not enough.
“People, obviously, that have lost their jobs are not going to be purchasing homes,” Gillespie said. “However, if you look back over the last two years, we’ve had 4 million jobs created in this country and 8 million babies were born, so there’s a lot of pent-up demand.”
I’m not positive, but pretty sure that job number is way off. I know they’re down this year, but if they are up since ’06 the more important question is where? Wal-Mart cashiers probably can’t afford the average house in CA.
And last time I checked babies weren’t buying any homes.
People confuse desire and demand. Wife and I had a child this year and would love to buy, but 10% off a net 140% (200%, -30%) runup in prices during a period of flat incomes is still over inflated.
I’ll come back when it’s 40%.
October 8, 2008 at 10:24 AM #283557crParticipantI’m glad to see Realtors waking up to reality, at least those who denied there was a bubble, but 10% is not enough.
“People, obviously, that have lost their jobs are not going to be purchasing homes,” Gillespie said. “However, if you look back over the last two years, we’ve had 4 million jobs created in this country and 8 million babies were born, so there’s a lot of pent-up demand.”
I’m not positive, but pretty sure that job number is way off. I know they’re down this year, but if they are up since ’06 the more important question is where? Wal-Mart cashiers probably can’t afford the average house in CA.
And last time I checked babies weren’t buying any homes.
People confuse desire and demand. Wife and I had a child this year and would love to buy, but 10% off a net 140% (200%, -30%) runup in prices during a period of flat incomes is still over inflated.
I’ll come back when it’s 40%.
October 8, 2008 at 10:24 AM #283584crParticipantI’m glad to see Realtors waking up to reality, at least those who denied there was a bubble, but 10% is not enough.
“People, obviously, that have lost their jobs are not going to be purchasing homes,” Gillespie said. “However, if you look back over the last two years, we’ve had 4 million jobs created in this country and 8 million babies were born, so there’s a lot of pent-up demand.”
I’m not positive, but pretty sure that job number is way off. I know they’re down this year, but if they are up since ’06 the more important question is where? Wal-Mart cashiers probably can’t afford the average house in CA.
And last time I checked babies weren’t buying any homes.
People confuse desire and demand. Wife and I had a child this year and would love to buy, but 10% off a net 140% (200%, -30%) runup in prices during a period of flat incomes is still over inflated.
I’ll come back when it’s 40%.
October 8, 2008 at 10:24 AM #283601crParticipantI’m glad to see Realtors waking up to reality, at least those who denied there was a bubble, but 10% is not enough.
“People, obviously, that have lost their jobs are not going to be purchasing homes,” Gillespie said. “However, if you look back over the last two years, we’ve had 4 million jobs created in this country and 8 million babies were born, so there’s a lot of pent-up demand.”
I’m not positive, but pretty sure that job number is way off. I know they’re down this year, but if they are up since ’06 the more important question is where? Wal-Mart cashiers probably can’t afford the average house in CA.
And last time I checked babies weren’t buying any homes.
People confuse desire and demand. Wife and I had a child this year and would love to buy, but 10% off a net 140% (200%, -30%) runup in prices during a period of flat incomes is still over inflated.
I’ll come back when it’s 40%.
October 8, 2008 at 10:24 AM #283610crParticipantI’m glad to see Realtors waking up to reality, at least those who denied there was a bubble, but 10% is not enough.
“People, obviously, that have lost their jobs are not going to be purchasing homes,” Gillespie said. “However, if you look back over the last two years, we’ve had 4 million jobs created in this country and 8 million babies were born, so there’s a lot of pent-up demand.”
I’m not positive, but pretty sure that job number is way off. I know they’re down this year, but if they are up since ’06 the more important question is where? Wal-Mart cashiers probably can’t afford the average house in CA.
And last time I checked babies weren’t buying any homes.
People confuse desire and demand. Wife and I had a child this year and would love to buy, but 10% off a net 140% (200%, -30%) runup in prices during a period of flat incomes is still over inflated.
I’ll come back when it’s 40%.
October 8, 2008 at 10:33 AM #283288EugeneParticipant[quote=cooprider]
People confuse desire and demand. Wife and I had a child this year and would love to buy, but 10% off a net 140% (200%, -30%) runup in prices during a period of flat incomes is still over inflated.I’ll come back when it’s 40%.[/quote]
200% up and 30% down = 110% up (300% * 70%)
200% up, 30% down, 10% more down = 89% up (300% * 70% * 90%)October 8, 2008 at 10:33 AM #283572EugeneParticipant[quote=cooprider]
People confuse desire and demand. Wife and I had a child this year and would love to buy, but 10% off a net 140% (200%, -30%) runup in prices during a period of flat incomes is still over inflated.I’ll come back when it’s 40%.[/quote]
200% up and 30% down = 110% up (300% * 70%)
200% up, 30% down, 10% more down = 89% up (300% * 70% * 90%)October 8, 2008 at 10:33 AM #283599EugeneParticipant[quote=cooprider]
People confuse desire and demand. Wife and I had a child this year and would love to buy, but 10% off a net 140% (200%, -30%) runup in prices during a period of flat incomes is still over inflated.I’ll come back when it’s 40%.[/quote]
200% up and 30% down = 110% up (300% * 70%)
200% up, 30% down, 10% more down = 89% up (300% * 70% * 90%)October 8, 2008 at 10:33 AM #283616EugeneParticipant[quote=cooprider]
People confuse desire and demand. Wife and I had a child this year and would love to buy, but 10% off a net 140% (200%, -30%) runup in prices during a period of flat incomes is still over inflated.I’ll come back when it’s 40%.[/quote]
200% up and 30% down = 110% up (300% * 70%)
200% up, 30% down, 10% more down = 89% up (300% * 70% * 90%)October 8, 2008 at 10:33 AM #283625EugeneParticipant[quote=cooprider]
People confuse desire and demand. Wife and I had a child this year and would love to buy, but 10% off a net 140% (200%, -30%) runup in prices during a period of flat incomes is still over inflated.I’ll come back when it’s 40%.[/quote]
200% up and 30% down = 110% up (300% * 70%)
200% up, 30% down, 10% more down = 89% up (300% * 70% * 90%)October 8, 2008 at 12:54 PM #283353donaldduckmooreParticipantWhy don’t they ask non-critical sellers to stop unnecessary listing. That will reduce the pool size and just the the foreclosed houses listed.
October 8, 2008 at 12:54 PM #283637donaldduckmooreParticipantWhy don’t they ask non-critical sellers to stop unnecessary listing. That will reduce the pool size and just the the foreclosed houses listed.
October 8, 2008 at 12:54 PM #283664donaldduckmooreParticipantWhy don’t they ask non-critical sellers to stop unnecessary listing. That will reduce the pool size and just the the foreclosed houses listed.
October 8, 2008 at 12:54 PM #283682donaldduckmooreParticipantWhy don’t they ask non-critical sellers to stop unnecessary listing. That will reduce the pool size and just the the foreclosed houses listed.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.