- This topic has 16 replies, 8 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 11 months ago by Anonymous.
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 28, 2007 at 8:42 AM #9409June 28, 2007 at 8:45 AM #62687DrewParticipant
My mistake, the list is the #258 cities…
June 28, 2007 at 8:45 AM #62736DrewParticipantMy mistake, the list is the #258 cities…
June 28, 2007 at 9:48 AM #62707PerryChaseParticipantI didn’t realize that San Antonio and Phoenix were bigger than San Diego. Now I know.
June 28, 2007 at 9:48 AM #62756PerryChaseParticipantI didn’t realize that San Antonio and Phoenix were bigger than San Diego. Now I know.
June 28, 2007 at 9:55 AM #62715surveyorParticipantSanA/Phx
They made a big deal about San Antonio being bigger than San Diego about a year and a half ago in the UT.
June 28, 2007 at 9:55 AM #62764surveyorParticipantSanA/Phx
They made a big deal about San Antonio being bigger than San Diego about a year and a half ago in the UT.
June 28, 2007 at 10:48 AM #62731ArtifactParticipantIt is a good thing all those people moving to San Diego will keep driving demand for housing…
I think my math is good enough to figure out that a net loss in population is in fact less than the number of new homes built in the last year. I am sure someone can spin that story though.
T
June 28, 2007 at 10:48 AM #62780ArtifactParticipantIt is a good thing all those people moving to San Diego will keep driving demand for housing…
I think my math is good enough to figure out that a net loss in population is in fact less than the number of new homes built in the last year. I am sure someone can spin that story though.
T
June 28, 2007 at 12:39 PM #62768CAwiremanParticipantSo, SD lost 377 people. Would consider that to
mean that population was flat. No appreciable gain or
loss….HiggyBaby
June 28, 2007 at 12:39 PM #62816CAwiremanParticipantSo, SD lost 377 people. Would consider that to
mean that population was flat. No appreciable gain or
loss….HiggyBaby
June 28, 2007 at 1:10 PM #62771DuckParticipantSan Marcos and Carlsbad had population growth of more than 5,000 for the same period. The housing mix (more homes for families in North County vs. more condos for singles and retirees in San Diego) must influence those numbers.
June 28, 2007 at 1:10 PM #62820DuckParticipantSan Marcos and Carlsbad had population growth of more than 5,000 for the same period. The housing mix (more homes for families in North County vs. more condos for singles and retirees in San Diego) must influence those numbers.
June 28, 2007 at 5:07 PM #62803crParticipantThe title is misleading. Fastest growing, implies increases in numbers as opposed to slowest growing or shrinking.
Don’t let the housing market bulls read this though, might scare ’em.
Maybe the title is designed to make them feel better.
June 28, 2007 at 5:07 PM #62852crParticipantThe title is misleading. Fastest growing, implies increases in numbers as opposed to slowest growing or shrinking.
Don’t let the housing market bulls read this though, might scare ’em.
Maybe the title is designed to make them feel better.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.