- This topic has 235 replies, 17 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 8 months ago by
Aecetia.
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 7, 2008 at 1:52 PM #12978June 7, 2008 at 9:06 PM #219151
no_such_reality
Participantold fogey McCain.
Ah, the party of tolerance practicing Agism.
June 7, 2008 at 9:06 PM #219245Participantold fogey McCain.
Ah, the party of tolerance practicing Agism.
June 7, 2008 at 9:06 PM #219263Participantold fogey McCain.
Ah, the party of tolerance practicing Agism.
June 7, 2008 at 9:06 PM #219292Participantold fogey McCain.
Ah, the party of tolerance practicing Agism.
June 7, 2008 at 9:06 PM #219313Participantold fogey McCain.
Ah, the party of tolerance practicing Agism.
June 7, 2008 at 9:21 PM #219156NotCranky
ParticipantWhy would she endorse someone who is too “inexperienced” for the job? Does she hate this country like Michelle does or what? If Obama picks an insider for VP running mate, and they don’t come more insider than a Kennedy, Edwards or Clinton, is he still the candidate of “Change”? Maybe he can find a liberal in the Bush family?That would be different at least.
June 7, 2008 at 9:21 PM #219250ParticipantWhy would she endorse someone who is too “inexperienced” for the job? Does she hate this country like Michelle does or what? If Obama picks an insider for VP running mate, and they don’t come more insider than a Kennedy, Edwards or Clinton, is he still the candidate of “Change”? Maybe he can find a liberal in the Bush family?That would be different at least.
June 7, 2008 at 9:21 PM #219269ParticipantWhy would she endorse someone who is too “inexperienced” for the job? Does she hate this country like Michelle does or what? If Obama picks an insider for VP running mate, and they don’t come more insider than a Kennedy, Edwards or Clinton, is he still the candidate of “Change”? Maybe he can find a liberal in the Bush family?That would be different at least.
June 7, 2008 at 9:21 PM #219297ParticipantWhy would she endorse someone who is too “inexperienced” for the job? Does she hate this country like Michelle does or what? If Obama picks an insider for VP running mate, and they don’t come more insider than a Kennedy, Edwards or Clinton, is he still the candidate of “Change”? Maybe he can find a liberal in the Bush family?That would be different at least.
June 7, 2008 at 9:21 PM #219318ParticipantWhy would she endorse someone who is too “inexperienced” for the job? Does she hate this country like Michelle does or what? If Obama picks an insider for VP running mate, and they don’t come more insider than a Kennedy, Edwards or Clinton, is he still the candidate of “Change”? Maybe he can find a liberal in the Bush family?That would be different at least.
June 7, 2008 at 10:09 PM #219198zk
ParticipantAh, the party of tolerance practicing Agism.
Marion is not the party of tolerance. Assigning the opinions of each follower of any party to the whole party is exactly the kind of misdirection that starts to turn these debates into meaningless shouting. Must we do that?
June 7, 2008 at 10:09 PM #219290ParticipantAh, the party of tolerance practicing Agism.
Marion is not the party of tolerance. Assigning the opinions of each follower of any party to the whole party is exactly the kind of misdirection that starts to turn these debates into meaningless shouting. Must we do that?
June 7, 2008 at 10:09 PM #219309ParticipantAh, the party of tolerance practicing Agism.
Marion is not the party of tolerance. Assigning the opinions of each follower of any party to the whole party is exactly the kind of misdirection that starts to turn these debates into meaningless shouting. Must we do that?
June 7, 2008 at 10:09 PM #219337ParticipantAh, the party of tolerance practicing Agism.
Marion is not the party of tolerance. Assigning the opinions of each follower of any party to the whole party is exactly the kind of misdirection that starts to turn these debates into meaningless shouting. Must we do that?
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.