Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › Client needs a loan
- This topic has 60 replies, 8 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 1 month ago by
Troubled Loner.
-
AuthorPosts
-
October 20, 2010 at 3:00 PM #621875October 20, 2010 at 3:13 PM #620807
Coronita
ParticipantQuestions:
* Is the $300k equity their estimate or is an appraised estimate?
* How old are they (roughly)?
Just curious….(PM me if you rather not say.)
October 20, 2010 at 3:13 PM #620887Coronita
ParticipantQuestions:
* Is the $300k equity their estimate or is an appraised estimate?
* How old are they (roughly)?
Just curious….(PM me if you rather not say.)
October 20, 2010 at 3:13 PM #621445Coronita
ParticipantQuestions:
* Is the $300k equity their estimate or is an appraised estimate?
* How old are they (roughly)?
Just curious….(PM me if you rather not say.)
October 20, 2010 at 3:13 PM #621566Coronita
ParticipantQuestions:
* Is the $300k equity their estimate or is an appraised estimate?
* How old are they (roughly)?
Just curious….(PM me if you rather not say.)
October 20, 2010 at 3:13 PM #621885Coronita
ParticipantQuestions:
* Is the $300k equity their estimate or is an appraised estimate?
* How old are they (roughly)?
Just curious….(PM me if you rather not say.)
October 20, 2010 at 3:21 PM #620822NotCranky
ParticipantSounds like they shouldn’t do it. This might be a “poster child” case for why we need national health care. Poor people get free health care. Rich people can afford it and people just a notch or two above poverty have to pay disproportionately relative to their capacity(even for insurance) or take a relatively large, if not ruinous hit to all they have worked for because of illness.
October 20, 2010 at 3:21 PM #620902NotCranky
ParticipantSounds like they shouldn’t do it. This might be a “poster child” case for why we need national health care. Poor people get free health care. Rich people can afford it and people just a notch or two above poverty have to pay disproportionately relative to their capacity(even for insurance) or take a relatively large, if not ruinous hit to all they have worked for because of illness.
October 20, 2010 at 3:21 PM #621460NotCranky
ParticipantSounds like they shouldn’t do it. This might be a “poster child” case for why we need national health care. Poor people get free health care. Rich people can afford it and people just a notch or two above poverty have to pay disproportionately relative to their capacity(even for insurance) or take a relatively large, if not ruinous hit to all they have worked for because of illness.
October 20, 2010 at 3:21 PM #621581NotCranky
ParticipantSounds like they shouldn’t do it. This might be a “poster child” case for why we need national health care. Poor people get free health care. Rich people can afford it and people just a notch or two above poverty have to pay disproportionately relative to their capacity(even for insurance) or take a relatively large, if not ruinous hit to all they have worked for because of illness.
October 20, 2010 at 3:21 PM #621900NotCranky
ParticipantSounds like they shouldn’t do it. This might be a “poster child” case for why we need national health care. Poor people get free health care. Rich people can afford it and people just a notch or two above poverty have to pay disproportionately relative to their capacity(even for insurance) or take a relatively large, if not ruinous hit to all they have worked for because of illness.
October 20, 2010 at 3:40 PM #620827Troubled Loner
Participantflu, they (husband and wife) are mid-50’s. Their equity estimate is actually higher, I believe $300,000 is accurate.
Russell, they both have medical conditions, cannot get medical insurance. They have depleted their IRA’s and pensions down to nothing, they can no longer pay the medical bills, and they are considering bankruptcy, but really don’t want to (they don’t feel it is right ethically). If they were able to pay off the $75,000 of medical bills, they would probably be OK (the monthly payments are quite high).
October 20, 2010 at 3:40 PM #620907Troubled Loner
Participantflu, they (husband and wife) are mid-50’s. Their equity estimate is actually higher, I believe $300,000 is accurate.
Russell, they both have medical conditions, cannot get medical insurance. They have depleted their IRA’s and pensions down to nothing, they can no longer pay the medical bills, and they are considering bankruptcy, but really don’t want to (they don’t feel it is right ethically). If they were able to pay off the $75,000 of medical bills, they would probably be OK (the monthly payments are quite high).
October 20, 2010 at 3:40 PM #621465Troubled Loner
Participantflu, they (husband and wife) are mid-50’s. Their equity estimate is actually higher, I believe $300,000 is accurate.
Russell, they both have medical conditions, cannot get medical insurance. They have depleted their IRA’s and pensions down to nothing, they can no longer pay the medical bills, and they are considering bankruptcy, but really don’t want to (they don’t feel it is right ethically). If they were able to pay off the $75,000 of medical bills, they would probably be OK (the monthly payments are quite high).
October 20, 2010 at 3:40 PM #621586Troubled Loner
Participantflu, they (husband and wife) are mid-50’s. Their equity estimate is actually higher, I believe $300,000 is accurate.
Russell, they both have medical conditions, cannot get medical insurance. They have depleted their IRA’s and pensions down to nothing, they can no longer pay the medical bills, and they are considering bankruptcy, but really don’t want to (they don’t feel it is right ethically). If they were able to pay off the $75,000 of medical bills, they would probably be OK (the monthly payments are quite high).
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.