Chowderhead going on the warpath on KOGO

[temeculaguy]

That transaction has Duke Cunninham flavor to it, possible a tax free payment for his propaganda.

If Chamberlain reads this, feel free to blame me. If not me personally, then my kind, “Reverse Flippers” (I just made that up, so if he uses the term I will know he reads these boards).

Reverse Flipper defined: long time owners who have sold and despite having the downpayment in the bank, high incomes and high credit scores, we refuse to buy. We see renting as an act of defiance and a shrewd business decision. With 5% price reductions each quarter, our middle finger, not out checkbooks are extended. We are immune, almost allergic to the kool-aid and our numbers are growing. Plasma T.V.’s, closing costs, granite counters and interest rate buy downs have no effect on us. We aren’t sitting on an uncomfortable fence, rather comfortably lounging on a La-z-boy and we want half off.

So blame us, we are holding the life preserver watching you drown from the safety of our boat and we won’t throw it to you. We have no soul and nothing pleasures us more than your suffering, we are the Reverse Flippers.

[NotCranky]

Nice work on that Reverse Flipper concept TG, especially for a post Chargers meltdown, Monday morning.

[farbet]

I want to join the”reverse flipper club”. Ditto

[farbet]

Fed ‘in a pickle,’ Pimco’s Gross says
Asserts falling home prices to dominate policy for years
By Rex Nutting, MarketWatch
Last Update: 12:40 PM ET Oct 1, 2007Print E-mail Subscribe to RSS Disable Live Quotes
WASHINGTON (MarketWatch) — Falling home prices will dominate Federal Reserve policy for the next several years, despite “false hopes” of a bottom in housing, “faux economic strength” or worries about the dollar, says Bill Gross, managing director of Pacific Investment Management Co.
Chowderhead!!! are you reading this?The rest of the story

http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/home-prices-dictate-fed-policy/story.aspx?guid=%7BC883C451%2D804C%2D4A39%2DB476%2D2870099B58DF%7D&dist=hplatest

[Rich Toscano]

For those who missed it, I wrote a little rejoinder to Chamberlin’s “vast renter conspiracy” article over at voiceofsandiego.org:

http://voiceofsandiego.org/articles/2007/10/01/toscano/888conspiracytheory081607.txt

have a great week…
rich

[cr]

This guy is clearly a tool and I am glad I am not in range of his radio nervous breakdowns. But to those of you who do listen to him, farbet posted the transcript that had his email.

[email protected]

Eamil him and tell him the truth. Here are some inspriational comments:

…In concert with much of the national and local media, they (us) have been able to artificially construct something that has never —- I repeat, never —- been done before: drive down housing prices at a time when unemployment is low, the economy is booming and consumer confidence is approaching record highs.

There is little land left for development, and that will indeed create a crisis in housing availability.

Owning a home is still the American dream and, since 97.4 percent of homeowners pay their mortgages on time, the dream seems to be working out pretty well.

This guy doesn’t deserve the time of day on these forums, and although I believe posted here once, I’d say email him directly and call him out rather than ripping on him here where we all know he’s an idiot.

[Rich Toscano]

Chamberlin never posted here to my knowledge. I tried to email him at that address before my first (of three and counting) voiceofsandiego.org article calling him out on something he wrote that was provably, factually inaccurate. I was quite civil and just asked him to let me know if I was misinterpreting what he said, or if he wanted to clarify, etc. — never heard back.

rich

[farbet]

I am not sure anyone has been ripping him off.Is Chowderhead in this category? ?
He puts his email up in the NCTimes.However, he never answers.Try it

[temeculaguy]

That adelphia e-mail may no longer work, having had an adelphia account it stopped working and wouldn’t forward e-mails a few months after company was taken over.

He isn’t likely to respond to yahoos like myself if he won’t respond to our feraless leader, Rich. Rich would be easy to contact, has a verifiable business phone number and e-mail, appears on television, in print and has a proven track record of calm and cogent debate. We are but mere annonymous lunatics, I wouldn’t respond to my e-mals either but the fact that he ignores Rich isn’t going to make me enthusiastic that he will make a cup of cocoa to sit down and read my rantings.

[farbet]

ditto

[Author]

Posts