- This topic has 40 replies, 8 voices, and was last updated 17 years, 4 months ago by
La Jolla Renter.
-
AuthorPosts
-
January 20, 2008 at 1:28 PM #139438January 20, 2008 at 4:43 PM #139478
davelj
ParticipantLa Jolla Renter,
I used Trust Administration Services Corp. (www.trustlynk.com) for several years as custodians for my self-directed IRAs and they SUCKED. Horrible customer service and their systems were worse. They made several large recordkeeping errors that were a pain in the ass to correct. I actually know the president of the bank that owns TASC and when I told him about my experience he apologized and said, “Yes, we have some problems to fix there.”
I recently switched to Polycomp (www.polycomp.net) and they are awesome. Very responsive. Tight recordkeeping. Fantastic.
As to the fees, asragov, the ones you posted aren’t eggregious. If you don’t plan on making sufficient returns to justify the fees then a self-directed IRA is not the proper vehicle to use. And if you’re investing in illiquid investments – like real estate – then you should be getting compensated for the illiquidity or you’re doing something wrong.
I am a huge fan of self-directed IRAs despite my horrible customer service experience with TASC. But if you don’t plan on earning at least 15% annually on an investment you probably shouldn’t put it in a self-directed IRA because the fees are higher than other standard IRA alternatives.
January 20, 2008 at 4:43 PM #139500davelj
ParticipantLa Jolla Renter,
I used Trust Administration Services Corp. (www.trustlynk.com) for several years as custodians for my self-directed IRAs and they SUCKED. Horrible customer service and their systems were worse. They made several large recordkeeping errors that were a pain in the ass to correct. I actually know the president of the bank that owns TASC and when I told him about my experience he apologized and said, “Yes, we have some problems to fix there.”
I recently switched to Polycomp (www.polycomp.net) and they are awesome. Very responsive. Tight recordkeeping. Fantastic.
As to the fees, asragov, the ones you posted aren’t eggregious. If you don’t plan on making sufficient returns to justify the fees then a self-directed IRA is not the proper vehicle to use. And if you’re investing in illiquid investments – like real estate – then you should be getting compensated for the illiquidity or you’re doing something wrong.
I am a huge fan of self-directed IRAs despite my horrible customer service experience with TASC. But if you don’t plan on earning at least 15% annually on an investment you probably shouldn’t put it in a self-directed IRA because the fees are higher than other standard IRA alternatives.
January 20, 2008 at 4:43 PM #139527davelj
ParticipantLa Jolla Renter,
I used Trust Administration Services Corp. (www.trustlynk.com) for several years as custodians for my self-directed IRAs and they SUCKED. Horrible customer service and their systems were worse. They made several large recordkeeping errors that were a pain in the ass to correct. I actually know the president of the bank that owns TASC and when I told him about my experience he apologized and said, “Yes, we have some problems to fix there.”
I recently switched to Polycomp (www.polycomp.net) and they are awesome. Very responsive. Tight recordkeeping. Fantastic.
As to the fees, asragov, the ones you posted aren’t eggregious. If you don’t plan on making sufficient returns to justify the fees then a self-directed IRA is not the proper vehicle to use. And if you’re investing in illiquid investments – like real estate – then you should be getting compensated for the illiquidity or you’re doing something wrong.
I am a huge fan of self-directed IRAs despite my horrible customer service experience with TASC. But if you don’t plan on earning at least 15% annually on an investment you probably shouldn’t put it in a self-directed IRA because the fees are higher than other standard IRA alternatives.
January 20, 2008 at 4:43 PM #139265davelj
ParticipantLa Jolla Renter,
I used Trust Administration Services Corp. (www.trustlynk.com) for several years as custodians for my self-directed IRAs and they SUCKED. Horrible customer service and their systems were worse. They made several large recordkeeping errors that were a pain in the ass to correct. I actually know the president of the bank that owns TASC and when I told him about my experience he apologized and said, “Yes, we have some problems to fix there.”
I recently switched to Polycomp (www.polycomp.net) and they are awesome. Very responsive. Tight recordkeeping. Fantastic.
As to the fees, asragov, the ones you posted aren’t eggregious. If you don’t plan on making sufficient returns to justify the fees then a self-directed IRA is not the proper vehicle to use. And if you’re investing in illiquid investments – like real estate – then you should be getting compensated for the illiquidity or you’re doing something wrong.
I am a huge fan of self-directed IRAs despite my horrible customer service experience with TASC. But if you don’t plan on earning at least 15% annually on an investment you probably shouldn’t put it in a self-directed IRA because the fees are higher than other standard IRA alternatives.
January 20, 2008 at 4:43 PM #139571davelj
ParticipantLa Jolla Renter,
I used Trust Administration Services Corp. (www.trustlynk.com) for several years as custodians for my self-directed IRAs and they SUCKED. Horrible customer service and their systems were worse. They made several large recordkeeping errors that were a pain in the ass to correct. I actually know the president of the bank that owns TASC and when I told him about my experience he apologized and said, “Yes, we have some problems to fix there.”
I recently switched to Polycomp (www.polycomp.net) and they are awesome. Very responsive. Tight recordkeeping. Fantastic.
As to the fees, asragov, the ones you posted aren’t eggregious. If you don’t plan on making sufficient returns to justify the fees then a self-directed IRA is not the proper vehicle to use. And if you’re investing in illiquid investments – like real estate – then you should be getting compensated for the illiquidity or you’re doing something wrong.
I am a huge fan of self-directed IRAs despite my horrible customer service experience with TASC. But if you don’t plan on earning at least 15% annually on an investment you probably shouldn’t put it in a self-directed IRA because the fees are higher than other standard IRA alternatives.
January 20, 2008 at 10:26 PM #139384La Jolla Renter
Participantdavelj,
I have used Trust Administration Services Corp. for several years and have always been happy with the service and transactions. It is good to hear of another alternative should my experience with them change.
Couldn’t agree with you more about an investment return of 15% or better to justify the fees.
January 20, 2008 at 10:26 PM #139599La Jolla Renter
Participantdavelj,
I have used Trust Administration Services Corp. for several years and have always been happy with the service and transactions. It is good to hear of another alternative should my experience with them change.
Couldn’t agree with you more about an investment return of 15% or better to justify the fees.
January 20, 2008 at 10:26 PM #139619La Jolla Renter
Participantdavelj,
I have used Trust Administration Services Corp. for several years and have always been happy with the service and transactions. It is good to hear of another alternative should my experience with them change.
Couldn’t agree with you more about an investment return of 15% or better to justify the fees.
January 20, 2008 at 10:26 PM #139647La Jolla Renter
Participantdavelj,
I have used Trust Administration Services Corp. for several years and have always been happy with the service and transactions. It is good to hear of another alternative should my experience with them change.
Couldn’t agree with you more about an investment return of 15% or better to justify the fees.
January 20, 2008 at 10:26 PM #139692La Jolla Renter
Participantdavelj,
I have used Trust Administration Services Corp. for several years and have always been happy with the service and transactions. It is good to hear of another alternative should my experience with them change.
Couldn’t agree with you more about an investment return of 15% or better to justify the fees.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.