Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › Businesses Taxed Too Much? Not Really…
- This topic has 140 replies, 10 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 2 months ago by ucodegen.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 23, 2011 at 5:00 PM #671421February 23, 2011 at 5:19 PM #670272AnonymousGuest
I agree with gandalf that our tax policy is biased to benefit a small percentage of people at the top, but the article cited in the OP really doesn’t make a good case for this position.
The debate is important, but unfortunately the argument made by the article is flawed. It is far more useful to look at aggregates over time than it is to pick and choose some years where a particular corporation did not pay taxes.
On the other hand, filling an entire page with the names of various taxes doesn’t really make for a meaningful rebuttal.
Perhaps we can all stand in agreement against pole taxes.
February 23, 2011 at 5:19 PM #670334AnonymousGuestI agree with gandalf that our tax policy is biased to benefit a small percentage of people at the top, but the article cited in the OP really doesn’t make a good case for this position.
The debate is important, but unfortunately the argument made by the article is flawed. It is far more useful to look at aggregates over time than it is to pick and choose some years where a particular corporation did not pay taxes.
On the other hand, filling an entire page with the names of various taxes doesn’t really make for a meaningful rebuttal.
Perhaps we can all stand in agreement against pole taxes.
February 23, 2011 at 5:19 PM #670943AnonymousGuestI agree with gandalf that our tax policy is biased to benefit a small percentage of people at the top, but the article cited in the OP really doesn’t make a good case for this position.
The debate is important, but unfortunately the argument made by the article is flawed. It is far more useful to look at aggregates over time than it is to pick and choose some years where a particular corporation did not pay taxes.
On the other hand, filling an entire page with the names of various taxes doesn’t really make for a meaningful rebuttal.
Perhaps we can all stand in agreement against pole taxes.
February 23, 2011 at 5:19 PM #671082AnonymousGuestI agree with gandalf that our tax policy is biased to benefit a small percentage of people at the top, but the article cited in the OP really doesn’t make a good case for this position.
The debate is important, but unfortunately the argument made by the article is flawed. It is far more useful to look at aggregates over time than it is to pick and choose some years where a particular corporation did not pay taxes.
On the other hand, filling an entire page with the names of various taxes doesn’t really make for a meaningful rebuttal.
Perhaps we can all stand in agreement against pole taxes.
February 23, 2011 at 5:19 PM #671426AnonymousGuestI agree with gandalf that our tax policy is biased to benefit a small percentage of people at the top, but the article cited in the OP really doesn’t make a good case for this position.
The debate is important, but unfortunately the argument made by the article is flawed. It is far more useful to look at aggregates over time than it is to pick and choose some years where a particular corporation did not pay taxes.
On the other hand, filling an entire page with the names of various taxes doesn’t really make for a meaningful rebuttal.
Perhaps we can all stand in agreement against pole taxes.
February 23, 2011 at 6:35 PM #670337surveyorParticipant[quote=pri_dk]On the other hand, filling an entire page with the names of various taxes doesn’t really make for a meaningful rebuttal.
[/quote]Assertion: “Businesses taxed too much? Not really…”
Rebuttal: A list of approximately 200 taxes businesses pay (a lot of which are not paid by individuals).
Conclusion: OWNED.
February 23, 2011 at 6:35 PM #670399surveyorParticipant[quote=pri_dk]On the other hand, filling an entire page with the names of various taxes doesn’t really make for a meaningful rebuttal.
[/quote]Assertion: “Businesses taxed too much? Not really…”
Rebuttal: A list of approximately 200 taxes businesses pay (a lot of which are not paid by individuals).
Conclusion: OWNED.
February 23, 2011 at 6:35 PM #671008surveyorParticipant[quote=pri_dk]On the other hand, filling an entire page with the names of various taxes doesn’t really make for a meaningful rebuttal.
[/quote]Assertion: “Businesses taxed too much? Not really…”
Rebuttal: A list of approximately 200 taxes businesses pay (a lot of which are not paid by individuals).
Conclusion: OWNED.
February 23, 2011 at 6:35 PM #671148surveyorParticipant[quote=pri_dk]On the other hand, filling an entire page with the names of various taxes doesn’t really make for a meaningful rebuttal.
[/quote]Assertion: “Businesses taxed too much? Not really…”
Rebuttal: A list of approximately 200 taxes businesses pay (a lot of which are not paid by individuals).
Conclusion: OWNED.
February 23, 2011 at 6:35 PM #671491surveyorParticipant[quote=pri_dk]On the other hand, filling an entire page with the names of various taxes doesn’t really make for a meaningful rebuttal.
[/quote]Assertion: “Businesses taxed too much? Not really…”
Rebuttal: A list of approximately 200 taxes businesses pay (a lot of which are not paid by individuals).
Conclusion: OWNED.
February 23, 2011 at 7:27 PM #670347gandalfParticipantucodegen, appreciate the excellent remarks. Apologize if I get a bit abrasive from time to time. Mixing it up with the facist Fox News brown shirts brings out the best in all of us.
In truth, I don’t know what the answer is. VAT? Flat? I know YOY valuation is impractical. Income is a decent approximation, if we could just tighten up the loopholes.
Definitely not a ‘fair system’ right now. Public finance is a mess, GOP is starving the beast, while billionaires and corporations within corps within corps play shell games with asset growth.
surveyor, what can I say? You lost your way a while ago. No ground control. You’re a sad and empty soul parroting twisted talking points handed down from GOP apparatchiks. Feel free to cut-n-paste more drivel…
February 23, 2011 at 7:27 PM #670409gandalfParticipantucodegen, appreciate the excellent remarks. Apologize if I get a bit abrasive from time to time. Mixing it up with the facist Fox News brown shirts brings out the best in all of us.
In truth, I don’t know what the answer is. VAT? Flat? I know YOY valuation is impractical. Income is a decent approximation, if we could just tighten up the loopholes.
Definitely not a ‘fair system’ right now. Public finance is a mess, GOP is starving the beast, while billionaires and corporations within corps within corps play shell games with asset growth.
surveyor, what can I say? You lost your way a while ago. No ground control. You’re a sad and empty soul parroting twisted talking points handed down from GOP apparatchiks. Feel free to cut-n-paste more drivel…
February 23, 2011 at 7:27 PM #671018gandalfParticipantucodegen, appreciate the excellent remarks. Apologize if I get a bit abrasive from time to time. Mixing it up with the facist Fox News brown shirts brings out the best in all of us.
In truth, I don’t know what the answer is. VAT? Flat? I know YOY valuation is impractical. Income is a decent approximation, if we could just tighten up the loopholes.
Definitely not a ‘fair system’ right now. Public finance is a mess, GOP is starving the beast, while billionaires and corporations within corps within corps play shell games with asset growth.
surveyor, what can I say? You lost your way a while ago. No ground control. You’re a sad and empty soul parroting twisted talking points handed down from GOP apparatchiks. Feel free to cut-n-paste more drivel…
February 23, 2011 at 7:27 PM #671158gandalfParticipantucodegen, appreciate the excellent remarks. Apologize if I get a bit abrasive from time to time. Mixing it up with the facist Fox News brown shirts brings out the best in all of us.
In truth, I don’t know what the answer is. VAT? Flat? I know YOY valuation is impractical. Income is a decent approximation, if we could just tighten up the loopholes.
Definitely not a ‘fair system’ right now. Public finance is a mess, GOP is starving the beast, while billionaires and corporations within corps within corps play shell games with asset growth.
surveyor, what can I say? You lost your way a while ago. No ground control. You’re a sad and empty soul parroting twisted talking points handed down from GOP apparatchiks. Feel free to cut-n-paste more drivel…
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.