- This topic has 80 replies, 13 voices, and was last updated 15 years ago by patientrenter.
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 4, 2009 at 8:41 PM #393635May 4, 2009 at 8:48 PM #392983jpinpbParticipant
This is the part most people should heed:
“Don’t be blinded by the glint of optimism in headlines about rising consumer confidence and slowing price declines”May 4, 2009 at 8:48 PM #393243jpinpbParticipantThis is the part most people should heed:
“Don’t be blinded by the glint of optimism in headlines about rising consumer confidence and slowing price declines”May 4, 2009 at 8:48 PM #393451jpinpbParticipantThis is the part most people should heed:
“Don’t be blinded by the glint of optimism in headlines about rising consumer confidence and slowing price declines”May 4, 2009 at 8:48 PM #393505jpinpbParticipantThis is the part most people should heed:
“Don’t be blinded by the glint of optimism in headlines about rising consumer confidence and slowing price declines”May 4, 2009 at 8:48 PM #393644jpinpbParticipantThis is the part most people should heed:
“Don’t be blinded by the glint of optimism in headlines about rising consumer confidence and slowing price declines”May 4, 2009 at 9:01 PM #392988patientrenterParticipant[quote=Russell]Bob,
We covered the baby boomer issue pretty well in the early days of this blog. I think most of us thought it is reasonable to think this could hurt future boom potential.[/quote]Rus, I know you don’t usually want to get ‘pinned down’, but do you think that it’s more likely that home prices, indexed to average per capita income, will be higher in 20 years, or lower?
A true believer in the demographic driver theories of Dent would say lower. True believers in the power of the past 50 years to predict the future would say higher.
OK, buddy, whose side are ya’ on?
May 4, 2009 at 9:01 PM #393248patientrenterParticipant[quote=Russell]Bob,
We covered the baby boomer issue pretty well in the early days of this blog. I think most of us thought it is reasonable to think this could hurt future boom potential.[/quote]Rus, I know you don’t usually want to get ‘pinned down’, but do you think that it’s more likely that home prices, indexed to average per capita income, will be higher in 20 years, or lower?
A true believer in the demographic driver theories of Dent would say lower. True believers in the power of the past 50 years to predict the future would say higher.
OK, buddy, whose side are ya’ on?
May 4, 2009 at 9:01 PM #393456patientrenterParticipant[quote=Russell]Bob,
We covered the baby boomer issue pretty well in the early days of this blog. I think most of us thought it is reasonable to think this could hurt future boom potential.[/quote]Rus, I know you don’t usually want to get ‘pinned down’, but do you think that it’s more likely that home prices, indexed to average per capita income, will be higher in 20 years, or lower?
A true believer in the demographic driver theories of Dent would say lower. True believers in the power of the past 50 years to predict the future would say higher.
OK, buddy, whose side are ya’ on?
May 4, 2009 at 9:01 PM #393510patientrenterParticipant[quote=Russell]Bob,
We covered the baby boomer issue pretty well in the early days of this blog. I think most of us thought it is reasonable to think this could hurt future boom potential.[/quote]Rus, I know you don’t usually want to get ‘pinned down’, but do you think that it’s more likely that home prices, indexed to average per capita income, will be higher in 20 years, or lower?
A true believer in the demographic driver theories of Dent would say lower. True believers in the power of the past 50 years to predict the future would say higher.
OK, buddy, whose side are ya’ on?
May 4, 2009 at 9:01 PM #393649patientrenterParticipant[quote=Russell]Bob,
We covered the baby boomer issue pretty well in the early days of this blog. I think most of us thought it is reasonable to think this could hurt future boom potential.[/quote]Rus, I know you don’t usually want to get ‘pinned down’, but do you think that it’s more likely that home prices, indexed to average per capita income, will be higher in 20 years, or lower?
A true believer in the demographic driver theories of Dent would say lower. True believers in the power of the past 50 years to predict the future would say higher.
OK, buddy, whose side are ya’ on?
May 4, 2009 at 11:28 PM #393083equalizerParticipantAll those somber figures can easily countered in the SD market by behavioral economists with the simple proclamation:
“Everybody wants to live in coastal San Diego, esp wealthy folks from Manhattan”.
May 4, 2009 at 11:28 PM #393343equalizerParticipantAll those somber figures can easily countered in the SD market by behavioral economists with the simple proclamation:
“Everybody wants to live in coastal San Diego, esp wealthy folks from Manhattan”.
May 4, 2009 at 11:28 PM #393551equalizerParticipantAll those somber figures can easily countered in the SD market by behavioral economists with the simple proclamation:
“Everybody wants to live in coastal San Diego, esp wealthy folks from Manhattan”.
May 4, 2009 at 11:28 PM #393604equalizerParticipantAll those somber figures can easily countered in the SD market by behavioral economists with the simple proclamation:
“Everybody wants to live in coastal San Diego, esp wealthy folks from Manhattan”.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.