big banks at risk in foreclosure fraud

[scaredyclassic]

this is diffferent.

lawsuits by investors in individual courts i think ARE PENDING, suing to get their money back, anything can happen in individual courtrooms, the fed does not control the judge.

hell, i should be suing.

juy trials man. how’s the fed going to control that?

this is th eWASHINGTON POST not some weirdo conspiracy rag. didn’t they break thewhole deep throat thing?

[Coronita]

[quote=walterwhite]this is diffferent.

lawsuits by investors in individual courts i think ARE PENDING, suing to get their money back, anything can happen in individual courtrooms, the fed does not control the judge.

hell, i should be suing.

juy trials man. how’s the fed going to control that?

this is th eWASHINGTON POST not some weirdo conspiracy rag. didn’t they break thewhole deep throat thing?[/quote]

Um sure…And while I’m not a lawyer (you are), where to high profile cases usually end up…Fed level…You think there wouldn’t be pressure from the governments to rule things a certain way? Seriously, you don’t think Fed judges would somewhat be biased? Come on man…You should know the entire system is rigged. These outcomes are not even possible on the monte carlo simulation so to speak.

You also forget who is still the significant shareholder in some of these banks…

[Coronita]

[quote=walterwhite]this is diffferent.

lawsuits by investors in individual courts i think ARE PENDING, suing to get their money back, anything can happen in individual courtrooms, the fed does not control the judge.

hell, i should be suing.

juy trials man. how’s the fed going to control that?

this is th eWASHINGTON POST not some weirdo conspiracy rag. didn’t they break thewhole deep throat thing?[/quote]

Um sure…And while I’m not a lawyer (you are), where to high profile cases usually end up…Fed level…You think there wouldn’t be pressure from the governments to rule things a certain way? Seriously, you don’t think Fed judges would somewhat be biased? Come on man…You should know the entire system is rigged. These outcomes are not even possible on the monte carlo simulation so to speak.

You also forget who is still the significant shareholder in some of these banks…

[Coronita]

[quote=walterwhite]this is diffferent.

lawsuits by investors in individual courts i think ARE PENDING, suing to get their money back, anything can happen in individual courtrooms, the fed does not control the judge.

hell, i should be suing.

juy trials man. how’s the fed going to control that?

this is th eWASHINGTON POST not some weirdo conspiracy rag. didn’t they break thewhole deep throat thing?[/quote]

Um sure…And while I’m not a lawyer (you are), where to high profile cases usually end up…Fed level…You think there wouldn’t be pressure from the governments to rule things a certain way? Seriously, you don’t think Fed judges would somewhat be biased? Come on man…You should know the entire system is rigged. These outcomes are not even possible on the monte carlo simulation so to speak.

You also forget who is still the significant shareholder in some of these banks…

[Coronita]

[quote=walterwhite]this is diffferent.

lawsuits by investors in individual courts i think ARE PENDING, suing to get their money back, anything can happen in individual courtrooms, the fed does not control the judge.

hell, i should be suing.

juy trials man. how’s the fed going to control that?

this is th eWASHINGTON POST not some weirdo conspiracy rag. didn’t they break thewhole deep throat thing?[/quote]

Um sure…And while I’m not a lawyer (you are), where to high profile cases usually end up…Fed level…You think there wouldn’t be pressure from the governments to rule things a certain way? Seriously, you don’t think Fed judges would somewhat be biased? Come on man…You should know the entire system is rigged. These outcomes are not even possible on the monte carlo simulation so to speak.

You also forget who is still the significant shareholder in some of these banks…

[Coronita]

[quote=walterwhite]this is diffferent.

lawsuits by investors in individual courts i think ARE PENDING, suing to get their money back, anything can happen in individual courtrooms, the fed does not control the judge.

hell, i should be suing.

juy trials man. how’s the fed going to control that?

this is th eWASHINGTON POST not some weirdo conspiracy rag. didn’t they break thewhole deep throat thing?[/quote]

Um sure…And while I’m not a lawyer (you are), where to high profile cases usually end up…Fed level…You think there wouldn’t be pressure from the governments to rule things a certain way? Seriously, you don’t think Fed judges would somewhat be biased? Come on man…You should know the entire system is rigged. These outcomes are not even possible on the monte carlo simulation so to speak.

You also forget who is still the significant shareholder in some of these banks…

[BigGovernmentIsGood]

[quote=Rich Toscano]So, let me get this straight…. you are saying that this scenario:

[quote=BigGovernmentIsGood]
Of course, what they don’t realize is that responsible people will get burned too. Imagine a homeowner that has been paying their mortgage faithfully and on time for several years to criminal bankster A. Criminal bankster B then shows up and says, hey, I actually hold the note, you haven’t been paying me and I’m going to foreclose.
[/quote]

…is something that most Piggs would approve of?

Sounds like another one of your trolls…[/quote]

No, I’m not saying that they would approve of it. The prevailing attitude here is that only irresponsible people are getting foreclosed upon. However, that is not always the case.

What I’m saying is that most Piggs probably don’t care whether the rule of law is followed when a borrower who isn’t making their payments gets foreclosed upon. However, if the banksters get away with not following the law and foreclosing on people who aren’t making their payments what is to stop them from then not following the law and foreclosing upon people who are making payments?

[BigGovernmentIsGood]

[quote=Rich Toscano]So, let me get this straight…. you are saying that this scenario:

[quote=BigGovernmentIsGood]
Of course, what they don’t realize is that responsible people will get burned too. Imagine a homeowner that has been paying their mortgage faithfully and on time for several years to criminal bankster A. Criminal bankster B then shows up and says, hey, I actually hold the note, you haven’t been paying me and I’m going to foreclose.
[/quote]

…is something that most Piggs would approve of?

Sounds like another one of your trolls…[/quote]

No, I’m not saying that they would approve of it. The prevailing attitude here is that only irresponsible people are getting foreclosed upon. However, that is not always the case.

What I’m saying is that most Piggs probably don’t care whether the rule of law is followed when a borrower who isn’t making their payments gets foreclosed upon. However, if the banksters get away with not following the law and foreclosing on people who aren’t making their payments what is to stop them from then not following the law and foreclosing upon people who are making payments?

[BigGovernmentIsGood]

[quote=Rich Toscano]So, let me get this straight…. you are saying that this scenario:

[quote=BigGovernmentIsGood]
Of course, what they don’t realize is that responsible people will get burned too. Imagine a homeowner that has been paying their mortgage faithfully and on time for several years to criminal bankster A. Criminal bankster B then shows up and says, hey, I actually hold the note, you haven’t been paying me and I’m going to foreclose.
[/quote]

…is something that most Piggs would approve of?

Sounds like another one of your trolls…[/quote]

No, I’m not saying that they would approve of it. The prevailing attitude here is that only irresponsible people are getting foreclosed upon. However, that is not always the case.

What I’m saying is that most Piggs probably don’t care whether the rule of law is followed when a borrower who isn’t making their payments gets foreclosed upon. However, if the banksters get away with not following the law and foreclosing on people who aren’t making their payments what is to stop them from then not following the law and foreclosing upon people who are making payments?

[BigGovernmentIsGood]

[quote=Rich Toscano]So, let me get this straight…. you are saying that this scenario:

[quote=BigGovernmentIsGood]
Of course, what they don’t realize is that responsible people will get burned too. Imagine a homeowner that has been paying their mortgage faithfully and on time for several years to criminal bankster A. Criminal bankster B then shows up and says, hey, I actually hold the note, you haven’t been paying me and I’m going to foreclose.
[/quote]

…is something that most Piggs would approve of?

Sounds like another one of your trolls…[/quote]

No, I’m not saying that they would approve of it. The prevailing attitude here is that only irresponsible people are getting foreclosed upon. However, that is not always the case.

What I’m saying is that most Piggs probably don’t care whether the rule of law is followed when a borrower who isn’t making their payments gets foreclosed upon. However, if the banksters get away with not following the law and foreclosing on people who aren’t making their payments what is to stop them from then not following the law and foreclosing upon people who are making payments?

[BigGovernmentIsGood]

[quote=Rich Toscano]So, let me get this straight…. you are saying that this scenario:

[quote=BigGovernmentIsGood]
Of course, what they don’t realize is that responsible people will get burned too. Imagine a homeowner that has been paying their mortgage faithfully and on time for several years to criminal bankster A. Criminal bankster B then shows up and says, hey, I actually hold the note, you haven’t been paying me and I’m going to foreclose.
[/quote]

…is something that most Piggs would approve of?

Sounds like another one of your trolls…[/quote]

No, I’m not saying that they would approve of it. The prevailing attitude here is that only irresponsible people are getting foreclosed upon. However, that is not always the case.

What I’m saying is that most Piggs probably don’t care whether the rule of law is followed when a borrower who isn’t making their payments gets foreclosed upon. However, if the banksters get away with not following the law and foreclosing on people who aren’t making their payments what is to stop them from then not following the law and foreclosing upon people who are making payments?

[scaredyclassic]

judges are sworn to follow the law. sometimes they actually do it.

[scaredyclassic]

judges are sworn to follow the law. sometimes they actually do it.

[scaredyclassic]

judges are sworn to follow the law. sometimes they actually do it.

[scaredyclassic]

judges are sworn to follow the law. sometimes they actually do it.

[Author]

Posts